Conservative historian Paul Johnson wears his ideology proudly on his sleeve in this often ruthless dissection of the thinkers and artists who (in his view) have shaped modern Western culture, having replaced some 200 years ago "the old clerisy as the guides and mentors of mankind." Taking on the likes of Karl Marx, Bertrand Russell, Lillian Hellman, and Noam Chomsky in turn, Johnson examines one idol after another and finds them all to have feet of clay. In his account, for instance, Ernest Hemingway emerges as an artistic hero who labored endlessly to forge a literary style unmistakably his own, but also as a deeply flawed man whose concern for the perfect phrase did not carry over to a concern for the women who loved him. Gossipy and sharply opinionated, Johnson's essay in cultural history spares no one.
Does it really matter that Henrik Ibsen was vain and arrogant, that Jean-Paul Sartre was incontinent? In Johnson's view, it does: these all-too-human foibles disqualify them, and other thinkers, from presuming to criticize the shortcomings of society. "Beware intellectuals," he concludes (though, given the subjects of his book, it seems he means intellectuals only of the left). "Not only should they be kept well away from the levers of power, they should also be objects of particular suspicion when they seek to offer collective advice." Whether one agrees or not, Johnson's profiles are frequently amusing and illuminating, as when he suggests that the only proletarian Karl Marx ever knew in person was the poor maid who worked for him for decades and was never paid, except in room and board, for her labors.
具体描述
读后感
这本书其实就是历史学家写的八卦野史，但其震撼人心之处在于主角都是我们常以为“伟光正”的著名知识分子。保罗约翰逊为我们揭示了这些整日高喊“正义”，“道德”，“博爱”的知识名流，其实个人品质并不高尚：卢梭忘恩负义，雪莱不守信用，托尔斯泰专断残暴，罗素喜欢胡说八...
评分“你连自己的家人都不爱，又怎么可能爱其他人？” 我们常常听到这样义正辞严而又雄辩有里的句子，在网络上与人舌战，这是常用的伎俩。 其实，细细想来，这样的逻辑，经不起推敲。 这是一本颠覆性质的书，说好听一点是“解构”，说不好听就是“扒粪”。 我当然相信书中关于那些...
评分约翰逊的这本书与我们当今的“潮流”——鄙视知识分子，嘲笑高学历，颇有契合之处。比如，眼下网上常有人将教授戏称为“叫兽”，而大众媒体也的确不是披露某些教授的无耻言行。一个浮躁拜金的社会出现招摇撞骗、德行有亏的知识分子是在不足为奇。然而我们也不能以“一颗老...
评分想必作者肯定不喜欢尼采的超人思想吧？ 作者所谓的知识分子“抽象”思考的人，是保罗定义为作者本人必须符合其“抽象”思考的人的未来类型。 尼采的超人思想是追求的一种人的类型，是超越现在的未来人，他高屋建瓴的仰望的未来的人的类型，而不是现存的人。保罗真是误导了广大...
评分“你连自己的家人都不爱，又怎么可能爱其他人？” 我们常常听到这样义正辞严而又雄辩有里的句子，在网络上与人舌战，这是常用的伎俩。 其实，细细想来，这样的逻辑，经不起推敲。 这是一本颠覆性质的书，说好听一点是“解构”，说不好听就是“扒粪”。 我当然相信书中关于那些...
用户评价
痛骂左派，阶级立场鲜明。
评分以记者的笔法写伟人八卦 有趣 有料 也有偏见
评分以记者的笔法写伟人八卦 有趣 有料 也有偏见
评分以记者的笔法写伟人八卦 有趣 有料 也有偏见
评分关于马克思那篇中文版删除。
相关图书
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息，本站不存储任何数据与内容，任何内容与数据均与本站无关，如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度，google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.wenda123.org All Rights Reserved. 图书目录大全 版权所有