For those that have some knowledge of the philosophical arguments concerning rights, this book is a clear and well-written contribution to the continuing debate between the interest and will theories.
The first third of the book is written by Kramer and split into two main sections; first, a robust defence of the Hohfeldian analytical framework and second, an equally firm proposition of the interest theory. Simmonds and Steiner write the second and third sections respectively, both supporting the will theory of rights, but for entirely different reasons with Simmonds considering that arguments over the nature or rights can be resolved only on political or moral grounds whereas Steiner prefers purely formal or analytical reasoning. Such discussion cracks open the differing and conflicting arguments in defence of the will theory which, in turn, compliments positions taken by Kramer when supporting the interest theory.
This is an accessible book presenting three different positions which clarify and sharpen the debate over rights. For anyone studying Hohfeld, Kramer's chapter and appendix defending this framework is invaluable. For those pondering the differences between the interest and will theories, this will be an illuminating and rewarding book to read.
具体描述
读后感
评分
评分
评分
评分
用户评价
看了Simmonds的部分。Simmonds对其他权利理论家所进行的批判可以说是相当细致而且犀利，却没能有力地捍卫自己的立场。
评分看了Simmonds的部分。Simmonds对其他权利理论家所进行的批判可以说是相当细致而且犀利，却没能有力地捍卫自己的立场。
评分看了Simmonds的部分。Simmonds对其他权利理论家所进行的批判可以说是相当细致而且犀利，却没能有力地捍卫自己的立场。
评分看了Simmonds的部分。Simmonds对其他权利理论家所进行的批判可以说是相当细致而且犀利，却没能有力地捍卫自己的立场。
评分看了Simmonds的部分。Simmonds对其他权利理论家所进行的批判可以说是相当细致而且犀利，却没能有力地捍卫自己的立场。
相关图书
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息，本站不存储任何数据与内容，任何内容与数据均与本站无关，如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度，google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.wenda123.org All Rights Reserved. 图书目录大全 版权所有