For those that have some knowledge of the philosophical arguments concerning rights, this book is a clear and well-written contribution to the continuing debate between the interest and will theories.
The first third of the book is written by Kramer and split into two main sections; first, a robust defence of the Hohfeldian analytical framework and second, an equally firm proposition of the interest theory. Simmonds and Steiner write the second and third sections respectively, both supporting the will theory of rights, but for entirely different reasons with Simmonds considering that arguments over the nature or rights can be resolved only on political or moral grounds whereas Steiner prefers purely formal or analytical reasoning. Such discussion cracks open the differing and conflicting arguments in defence of the will theory which, in turn, compliments positions taken by Kramer when supporting the interest theory.
This is an accessible book presenting three different positions which clarify and sharpen the debate over rights. For anyone studying Hohfeld, Kramer's chapter and appendix defending this framework is invaluable. For those pondering the differences between the interest and will theories, this will be an illuminating and rewarding book to read.
具體描述
讀後感
評分
評分
評分
評分
用戶評價
看瞭Simmonds的部分。Simmonds對其他權利理論傢所進行的批判可以說是相當細緻而且犀利，卻沒能有力地捍衛自己的立場。
评分看瞭Simmonds的部分。Simmonds對其他權利理論傢所進行的批判可以說是相當細緻而且犀利，卻沒能有力地捍衛自己的立場。
评分看瞭Simmonds的部分。Simmonds對其他權利理論傢所進行的批判可以說是相當細緻而且犀利，卻沒能有力地捍衛自己的立場。
评分看瞭Simmonds的部分。Simmonds對其他權利理論傢所進行的批判可以說是相當細緻而且犀利，卻沒能有力地捍衛自己的立場。
评分看瞭Simmonds的部分。Simmonds對其他權利理論傢所進行的批判可以說是相當細緻而且犀利，卻沒能有力地捍衛自己的立場。
相關圖書
本站所有內容均為互聯網搜索引擎提供的公開搜索信息，本站不存儲任何數據與內容，任何內容與數據均與本站無關，如有需要請聯繫相關搜索引擎包括但不限於百度，google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 qciss.net All Rights Reserved. 小哈圖書下載中心 版权所有