Bruce Trigger has merged the history of archaeology with new perspectives on how to understand the past. He is a critical analyst and architect of social evolutionary theory, an Egyptologist, and an authority on aboriginal cultures in north-eastern North America. His contextualization of archaeology within broader society has encouraged appreciation of the power of archaeological knowledge and he has been an effective voice for non-oppositional forms of argument in archaeological theory. In "The Archaeology of Bruce Trigger", leading scholars discuss their own approaches to the interpretation of archaeological data in relation to Trigger's fundamental intellectual contributions. Contributors include Michael Bisson (McGill), Stephen Chrisomalis (Toronto), Jerimy J. Cunningham (Calgary), Brian Fagan (Lindbrior Corporation), Clare Fawcett (St. Francis Xavier), Junko Habu (California at Berkeley), Ian Hodder (Stanford), Jane Kelley (Calgary), Martha Latta (Toronto), Robert MacDonald (Archaeological Services Inc.) , Randall McGuire (Binghamton), Lynn Meskell (Columbia), Toby Morantz (McGill), Robert Pearce (London Museum of Archaeology), David Smith (Toronto), Peter Timmins (Timmins Martelle Heritage Consultants), Silvia Toma'kova (North Carolina), Bruce G. Trigger (McGill), Alexander von Gernet (Toronto), Gary Warrick (Wilfrid Laurier), Ronald F. Williamson (Archaeological Services Inc.), Alison Wylie (Washington), and Eldon Yellowhorn (Simon Frasier).
Bruce Trigger has merged the history of archaeology with new perspectives on how to understand the past. He is a critical analyst and architect of social evolutionary theory, an Egyptologist, and an authority on aboriginal cultures in north-eastern North America. His contextualization of archaeology within broader society has encouraged appreciation of the power of archaeological knowledge and he has been an effective voice for non-oppositional forms of argument in archaeological theory.
In The Archaeology of Bruce Trigger, leading scholars discuss their own approaches to the interpretation of archaeological data in relation to Trigger's fundamental intellectual contributions
Contributors include Michael Bisson (McGill), Stephen Chrisomalis (Toronto), Jerimy J. Cunningham (Calgary), Brian Fagan (Lindbrior Corporation), Clare Fawcett (St. Francis Xavier), Junko Habu (California at Berkeley), Ian Hodder (Stanford), Jane Kelley (Calgary), Martha Latta (Toronto), Robert MacDonald (Archaeological Services Inc.), Randall McGuire (Binghamton), Lynn Meskell (Columbia), Toby Morantz (McGill), Robert Pearce (London Museum of Archaeology), David Smith (Toronto), Peter Timmins (Timmins Martelle Heritage Consultants), Silvia Tomášková (North Carolina), Bruce G. Trigger (McGill), Alexander von Gernet (Toronto), Gary Warrick (Wilfrid Laurier), Ronald F. Williamson (Archaeological Services Inc.), Alison Wylie (Washington), and Eldon Yellowhorn (Simon Frasier),
Ronald F. Williamson is the co-editor of Taming the Taxonomy: Towards a New Understanding of Great Lakes Archaeology and president and chief archaeologist, Archaeological Services Inc.
Michael S. Bisson is associate professor and chair, anthropology, McGill University.
评分
评分
评分
评分
这本书的插图和图表的编排堪称一绝,它们绝非可有可无的装饰,而是叙事中不可或缺的有机组成部分。那些精细的测绘图、出土器物的拓片复制件,以及复杂的地层剖面示意图,都以一种极高的清晰度和专业水准呈现出来。更重要的是,图文的配合达到了完美的协同效应:文字部分阐述理论,而图表则提供了直观的、无可辩驳的实证支撑。我发现自己时常停下阅读的脚步,仔细研究一张结构图,然后回溯文本,发现两者之间存在着一种微妙的互证关系。这种高度整合的视觉与文本呈现方式,极大地增强了知识的吸收效率,使得那些原本抽象的年代划分和空间分布逻辑,变得触手可及,极大地提升了作为一本学术参考书的实用价值。
评分从文字的质感来看,这本书的语言风格显得尤为厚重和内敛,充满了学者特有的克制美。它没有太多花哨的辞藻堆砌,而是专注于概念的精确传递和论点的有力支撑。阅读过程中,我强烈感受到了一种对史料的敬畏之心,作者仿佛是一个谦逊的引路人,小心翼翼地带领我们走进那些布满荆棘的学术迷宫。其中对于一些关键术语的界定和阐释,反复斟酌,力求准确无误,这对于学术著作而言至关重要。这种对语言的严苛要求,使得全书的阅读体验虽然需要一定的专注度,但最终的回报是丰厚的知识积累和思维上的严谨训练。它不是那种可以随意翻阅消遣的读物,更像是一份需要投入心力去品读和消化的知识盛宴,每一次回味都能品出新的层次。
评分这本书给我带来的最大冲击之一,在于它对“进步”概念的反思。在传统的历史叙事中,我们往往习惯于用线性、向上的轨迹来描绘人类文明的发展,将“更复杂”等同于“更优越”。然而,作者通过对不同社会形态的细致比较和深入分析,巧妙地挑战了这种单向度的视角。书中呈现的那些曾经辉煌却最终消亡的社会形态,并非简单的失败案例,而是对特定环境约束下最优解的探索。这种多维度的评价标准,极大地拓展了我的历史观,让我开始以一种更为包容和去中心化的眼光看待过去的人类实验。它让我们意识到,不同时代的人们,在他们所处的生态位中,其生存智慧和组织能力同样值得我们深思和尊重,而非仅仅是作为我们现代文明的脚注或前奏。
评分这本书的论证结构堪称教科书级别的典范,它不仅仅是对一系列考古发现的简单罗列,更是一次对人类认知模式和文化变迁的深刻剖析。作者在构建其核心论点时,展现出了一种令人敬佩的逻辑链条,每一步推导都建立在前文扎实的基础上,如同精心搭建的拱桥,坚固且优美。我尤其欣赏他对“文化”这一复杂概念的解构与重构过程,他并未将文化视为一个静态的、同质的实体,而是将其视为一个动态的、不断适应和响应环境压力的适应性系统。这种动态的视角,使得书中对不同区域、不同时间段的文化解释充满了活力和说服力。对于任何希望系统性理解文化变迁驱动力的读者来说,这本书无疑提供了一个极为清晰且富有启发性的框架。它迫使你跳出固有的思维定势,去重新审视那些看似理所当然的历史叙事。
评分这本书的叙事节奏把握得真是太到位了,读起来简直让人手不释卷。作者仿佛是一位技艺高超的导演,将那些遥远的史前场景,那些沉睡在地下数千年的文明遗迹,描绘得栩栩如生。我尤其欣赏他处理信息密度的方式,既有足够的学术深度来支撑论点的严谨性,又巧妙地穿插了大量的生动细节和考古现场的感官体验。那种仿佛亲手拂去泥土,触摸到古人留下的工具和陶器时的震撼感,是其他理论探讨式的著作难以比拟的。书中对考古学方法论的演变,尤其是从早期浪漫主义式的探险挖掘,到后来强调田野工作规范化和跨学科合作的现代转向,梳理得井然有序,让我这个非专业人士也能清晰地理解考古学是如何从一种“寻宝”活动,逐渐蜕变为一门严谨的科学。那种对过去时代生活方式的细致推测,充满了人文关怀,让我对那些沉默的古代人群产生了更深层次的共鸣,感觉自己仿佛参与了一次跨越时空的对话。
评分不仅是一部个人的学术史,更是近五十年来当代考古学、历史学理论争鸣的写照。
评分不仅是一部个人的学术史,更是近五十年来当代考古学、历史学理论争鸣的写照。
评分不仅是一部个人的学术史,更是近五十年来当代考古学、历史学理论争鸣的写照。
评分不仅是一部个人的学术史,更是近五十年来当代考古学、历史学理论争鸣的写照。
评分不仅是一部个人的学术史,更是近五十年来当代考古学、历史学理论争鸣的写照。
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2026 book.wenda123.org All Rights Reserved. 图书目录大全 版权所有