In these innovative essays, Vivian Sobchack considers the key role our bodies play in making sense of today's image-saturated culture. Emphasizing our corporeal rather than our intellectual engagements with film and other media, Carnal Thoughts shows how our experience always emerges through our senses and how our bodies are not just visible objects but also sense-making, visual subjects. Sobchack draws on both phenomenological philosophy and a broad range of popular sources to explore bodily experience in contemporary, moving-image culture. She examines how, through the conflation of cinema and surgery, we've all "had our eyes done"; why we are "moved" by the movies; and the different ways in which we inhabit photographic, cinematic, and electronic space. Carnal Thoughts provides a lively and engaging challenge to the mind/body split by demonstrating that the process of "making sense" requires an irreducible collaboration between our thoughts and our senses.
评分
评分
评分
评分
总算读完了,最后一篇现象学术语用的那叫一个多啊,引用的萨特完全是看不懂呀,就第一篇论迷路和中间从一个残疾人视角论述身体并反对鲍德里亚论科幻的那篇论文写得比较好。另外对纪录片的视角的讨论也还是有些意思的。唉,总算磨完了……
评分写得很好啊,短评第一在说什么………
评分sensory analysis of film experience on the theoretical basis of phenomenology and psychology
评分#Warwick# Vivian Sobchack, ‘What My Fingers Knew: The Cinesthetic Subject, or Vision in the Flesh’, pp. 53-84.
评分Provides vivid examples for The Address of the Eye, but somehow repetitive
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.wenda123.org All Rights Reserved. 图书目录大全 版权所有