In these innovative essays, Vivian Sobchack considers the key role our bodies play in making sense of today's image-saturated culture. Emphasizing our corporeal rather than our intellectual engagements with film and other media, Carnal Thoughts shows how our experience always emerges through our senses and how our bodies are not just visible objects but also sense-making, visual subjects. Sobchack draws on both phenomenological philosophy and a broad range of popular sources to explore bodily experience in contemporary, moving-image culture. She examines how, through the conflation of cinema and surgery, we've all "had our eyes done"; why we are "moved" by the movies; and the different ways in which we inhabit photographic, cinematic, and electronic space. Carnal Thoughts provides a lively and engaging challenge to the mind/body split by demonstrating that the process of "making sense" requires an irreducible collaboration between our thoughts and our senses.
具體描述
讀後感
評分
評分
評分
評分
用戶評價
#Warwick# Vivian Sobchack, ‘What My Fingers Knew: The Cinesthetic Subject, or Vision in the Flesh’, pp. 53-84.
评分sensory analysis of film experience on the theoretical basis of phenomenology and psychology
评分寫得很好啊，短評第一在說什麼………
评分這完全是一本隨筆散文集 太散瞭根本不是學術文章 理論和分析都很不成體係 穿插著自己的瑣事經曆。行文晦澀 旁徵博引有如一鍋理論亂燉 加上自創的解構詞匯(phenomeno-logic in-form dis-ease response-ability etc.)和不加解說的術語實在太難為非現象學讀者瞭。對先驗論反駁乏力 裏麵很多思考太過跳躍 而且對一些大而化之的理論不假思索地使用 譬如客觀時間綫性的坍塌怎麼會是後現代導緻的 而應該從自然科學研究入手吧。方法上沒什麼可以藉鑒的一本書 婆婆媽媽的 一樣的內容怎麼可以寫這麼多字太可怕瞭 還好主題和內容還是具有啓發性的 類似於法國理論作品 也不局限於電影而是對各種我們時代的技術相關問題都有涉及。個人覺得比較有意思的章節是1 3 5 6 8 12。
评分總算讀完瞭，最後一篇現象學術語用的那叫一個多啊，引用的薩特完全是看不懂呀，就第一篇論迷路和中間從一個殘疾人視角論述身體並反對鮑德裏亞論科幻的那篇論文寫得比較好。另外對紀錄片的視角的討論也還是有些意思的。唉，總算磨完瞭……
相關圖書
本站所有內容均為互聯網搜索引擎提供的公開搜索信息，本站不存儲任何數據與內容，任何內容與數據均與本站無關，如有需要請聯繫相關搜索引擎包括但不限於百度，google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 qciss.net All Rights Reserved. 小哈圖書下載中心 版权所有