An illumination of one of the most explosive and publicized "holocaust trials" since that of Adolf Eichmann, by a leading historian who acted as chief adviser to the defense In ruling against the controversial historian David Irving, whose libel suit against the American historian Deborah Lipstadt was tried in April 2000, the High Court in London labeled Irving a falsifier of history. No objective historian, declared the judge, would manipulate the documentary record in the way that Irving did. Richard J. Evans, a Cambridge historian and the chief adviser for the defense, uses this famous trial as a lens for exploring a range of difficult questions about the nature of the historian's enterprise.
具体描述
读后感
评分
评分
评分
评分
用户评价
成王败寇的道理其实是不分中外的，历史是胜利者书写的。
评分成王败寇的道理其实是不分中外的，历史是胜利者书写的。
评分如果说这是一本对postmodernist history theory的rebuttal的话，很不成功。Manipulation of public moral pressure也正应了Foucault所说的"regime of truth"。
评分成王败寇的道理其实是不分中外的，历史是胜利者书写的。
评分对后现代的反驳还是有点无力了，作者预设很多基本底线但是后现代本身就是要模糊底线的，很多时候只是碍于政治正确不讲出来罢了
相关图书
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息，本站不存储任何数据与内容，任何内容与数据均与本站无关，如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度，google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.wenda123.org All Rights Reserved. 图书目录大全 版权所有