Offering a fundamental reinterpretation of the emergence of the Soviet state, Peter Holquist situates the Bolshevik Revolution within the continuum of mobilization and violence that began with World War I and extended through Russia's civil war. In so doing, Holquist provides a new genealogy for Bolshevik political practices, one that places them clearly among Russian and European wartime measures. From this perspective, the Russian Revolution was no radical rupture with the past, but rather the fulcrum point in a continent-wide era of crisis and violence that began in 1914. While Tsarist and Revolutionary governments implemented policies for total mobilization common to other warring powers, they did so in a supercharged and concentrated form. Holquist highlights how the distinctive contours of Russian political life set its experience in these years apart from other wartime societies. In pursuit of revolution, statesmen carried over crisis-created measures into political life and then incorporated them into the postwar political structure. Focusing on three particular policies - state management of food; the employment of official violence for political ends; and state surveillance -Holquist demonstrates the interplay of state policy and local implementation, and its impact on the lives of ordinary citizens. "Making War, Forging Revolution" casts a new light on Russia's revolution and boldy inserts it into the larger story of the Great War and 20th-century European history.
具体描述
读后感
评分
评分
评分
评分
用户评价
Holquist's central argument is refreshingly insightful. The tsarist regime's wartime political practices survived into the Soviet era and became institutionalized by the Bolsheviks, and most of those practices were shared by other major European powers for the purpose of total social mobilization and efficient governance. 视角独特的解释了苏联政权的现代性。
评分Holquist's central argument is refreshingly insightful. The tsarist regime's wartime political practices survived into the Soviet era and became institutionalized by the Bolsheviks, and most of those practices were shared by other major European powers for the purpose of total social mobilization and efficient governance. 视角独特的解释了苏联政权的现代性。
评分Holquist's central argument is refreshingly insightful. The tsarist regime's wartime political practices survived into the Soviet era and became institutionalized by the Bolsheviks, and most of those practices were shared by other major European powers for the purpose of total social mobilization and efficient governance. 视角独特的解释了苏联政权的现代性。
评分Holquist's central argument is refreshingly insightful. The tsarist regime's wartime political practices survived into the Soviet era and became institutionalized by the Bolsheviks, and most of those practices were shared by other major European powers for the purpose of total social mobilization and efficient governance. 视角独特的解释了苏联政权的现代性。
评分Holquist's central argument is refreshingly insightful. The tsarist regime's wartime political practices survived into the Soviet era and became institutionalized by the Bolsheviks, and most of those practices were shared by other major European powers for the purpose of total social mobilization and efficient governance. 视角独特的解释了苏联政权的现代性。
相关图书
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息，本站不存储任何数据与内容，任何内容与数据均与本站无关，如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度，google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.wenda123.org All Rights Reserved. 图书目录大全 版权所有