This welcome second edition of A History of Eastern Europe provides a thematic historical survey of the formative processes of political, social and economic change which have played paramount roles in shaping the evolution and development of the region. Subjects covered include: Eastern Europe in ancient, medieval and early modern times the legacies of Byzantium, the Ottoman Empire and the Habsburg Empire the impact of the region's powerful Russian and Germanic neighbours rival concepts of 'Central' and 'Eastern' Europe the experience and consequences of the two World Wars varieties of fascism in Eastern Europe the impact of Communism from the 1940s to the 1980s post-Communist democratization and marketization the eastward enlargement of the EU. A History of Eastern Europe now includes two new chronologies - one for the Balkans and one for East-Central Europe - and a glossary of key terms and concepts, providing comprehensive coverage of a complex past, from antiquity to the present day.
这本书在文字上是有这样那样的问题,但对我这个门外汉已然足够了。瑕不掩瑜。文字上的缺点没必要像其他人说的那样激烈。当然,不出现这些的问题是最好。主要也是因为我是读闲书的,所以没那么严谨的要求。 巴尔干、中东欧,在三五百年内看起来挺像清朝,当然也有很大的不同,但...
评分94页,“1197年,教皇亚历克修斯三世(1195—1203年在位)曾经……“ ——人家是拜占庭皇帝,不是教皇。1195-1203年的教皇是塞勒斯汀和英诺森三世。 69页,“马其顿和色雷斯受到了土耳其保加利亚人的侵犯”。 ——刚开始我还觉得奇怪,“土耳其保加利亚人”是个啥...
评分这本书在文字上是有这样那样的问题,但对我这个门外汉已然足够了。瑕不掩瑜。文字上的缺点没必要像其他人说的那样激烈。当然,不出现这些的问题是最好。主要也是因为我是读闲书的,所以没那么严谨的要求。 巴尔干、中东欧,在三五百年内看起来挺像清朝,当然也有很大的不同,但...
评分94页,“1197年,教皇亚历克修斯三世(1195—1203年在位)曾经……“ ——人家是拜占庭皇帝,不是教皇。1195-1203年的教皇是塞勒斯汀和英诺森三世。 69页,“马其顿和色雷斯受到了土耳其保加利亚人的侵犯”。 ——刚开始我还觉得奇怪,“土耳其保加利亚人”是个啥...
评分这本书在文字上是有这样那样的问题,但对我这个门外汉已然足够了。瑕不掩瑜。文字上的缺点没必要像其他人说的那样激烈。当然,不出现这些的问题是最好。主要也是因为我是读闲书的,所以没那么严谨的要求。 巴尔干、中东欧,在三五百年内看起来挺像清朝,当然也有很大的不同,但...
Not very recommended for whoever only looking for a concise history of Eastern Europe, as the authors include much more than that. As its subtitle"Crisis and Change" suggests, it is written in a way more like academic papers instead of a chronicle, so there are too many debates, arguments which might not be useful for some readers.
评分Not very recommended for whoever only looking for a concise history of Eastern Europe, as the authors include much more than that. As its subtitle"Crisis and Change" suggests, it is written in a way more like academic papers instead of a chronicle, so there are too many debates, arguments which might not be useful for some readers.
评分Not very recommended for whoever only looking for a concise history of Eastern Europe, as the authors include much more than that. As its subtitle"Crisis and Change" suggests, it is written in a way more like academic papers instead of a chronicle, so there are too many debates, arguments which might not be useful for some readers.
评分Not very recommended for whoever only looking for a concise history of Eastern Europe, as the authors include much more than that. As its subtitle"Crisis and Change" suggests, it is written in a way more like academic papers instead of a chronicle, so there are too many debates, arguments which might not be useful for some readers.
评分Not very recommended for whoever only looking for a concise history of Eastern Europe, as the authors include much more than that. As its subtitle"Crisis and Change" suggests, it is written in a way more like academic papers instead of a chronicle, so there are too many debates, arguments which might not be useful for some readers.
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.wenda123.org All Rights Reserved. 图书目录大全 版权所有