Xiaoyuan Liu is an Associate Professor of History at Iowa State University and a recent Fellow at the Woodrow Wilson Center in Washington.
In this pathbreaking book, Xiaoyuan Liu establishes the ways in which the history of the Chinese Communist Party was, from the Yan’an period onward, intertwined with the ethnopolitics of the Chinese “periphery.” As a Han-dominated party, the CCP had to adapt to an inhospitable political environment, particularly among the Hui (Muslims) of northwest China and the Mongols of Inner Mongolia. Based on a careful examination of CCP and Soviet Comintern documents only recently available, Liu’s study shows why the CCP found itself unable to follow the Russian Bolshevik precedent by inciting separatism among the non-Han peoples as a stratagem for gaining national power. Rather than swallowing Marxist-Leninist dogma on “the nationalities question,” the CCP took a position closer to that of the Kuomintang, stressing the inclusiveness of the Han-dominated Chinese nation, “Zhongua Minzu.”
評分
評分
評分
評分
教科書對那段時期簡直可以說是空白,原始資料支撐起來的論點很有說服力,所有的行動都是為著政治利益服務的,其他的一切?什麼是其他的一切,我隻知道利益。
评分教科書對那段時期簡直可以說是空白,原始資料支撐起來的論點很有說服力,所有的行動都是為著政治利益服務的,其他的一切?什麼是其他的一切,我隻知道利益。
评分綫條比較粗疏,其實完全可以壓縮成一篇高質量論文。可以作為一個黨國體製下邊疆民族政策發展演變大綱,按圖索驥看感興趣的部分。
评分如今再看的話,無論是材料還是觀點,就顯得沒什麼新意瞭。中共民族政策在1921-1945固然是有“去蘇維埃化”的部分,但並不是要徹底的去“去蘇維埃化”。1949年後,更是如此。
评分綫條比較粗疏,其實完全可以壓縮成一篇高質量論文。可以作為一個黨國體製下邊疆民族政策發展演變大綱,按圖索驥看感興趣的部分。
本站所有內容均為互聯網搜索引擎提供的公開搜索信息,本站不存儲任何數據與內容,任何內容與數據均與本站無關,如有需要請聯繫相關搜索引擎包括但不限於百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 qciss.net All Rights Reserved. 小哈圖書下載中心 版权所有