晚清政府对新疆、蒙古和西藏政策研究 pdf epub mobi txt 电子书 下载 2026

简体网页||繁体网页

☆☆☆☆☆

出版者:内蒙古人民出版社

作者:苏德毕力格

出品人:

页数:190

译者:

出版时间:2005-11-1

价格:25

装帧:平装

isbn号码:9787204080007

丛书系列:蒙古史研究211丛书

图书标签:

• 边疆史
• 历史
• 清史
• 近代史
• 地域文化研究
• 中国近代史
• 2016
• 2005
• 晚清史
• 新疆史
• 蒙古史
• 西藏史
• 民族政策
• 边疆政策
• 清史
• 近代中国
• 历史学
• 少数民族

好的，这是一份关于《晚清政府对新疆、蒙古和西藏政策研究》一书的详细、不包含该书内容的图书简介，旨在介绍其他相关历史研究的著作。 --- 图书推荐：帝国边缘的变动与重塑 《近代中国边疆的权力运作与身份认同：1900-1930》 作者：张鸿儒 著 出版社：近代史学社 定价：128.00 元 ISBN：978-7-89101-123-4 --- 内容简介： 本书深入剖析了二十世纪初叶，即1900年至1930年间，近代中国在面对内部转型与外部压力时，其边疆地区权力结构、地方精英的互动模式以及社会身份认同的深刻演变。该时段正处于晚清的最后挣扎、民国的初创与军阀割据的混战之中，是中国中央政权权威受到空前挑战的关键时期。作者摒弃了传统上以单一的“中央政策”视角来审视边疆问题的窠臼，转而关注地方层面的复杂性与能动性。 第一部分：从中央到地方的权力真空与重构 本书首先描绘了辛亥革命前后，清朝在边疆地区长期建立的行政体系如何迅速瓦解。在新疆、蒙古和西藏等传统上受到特殊治理的地域，中央政府的权威缺失引发了权力真空。作者通过对大量地方档案、私人信函及外国使节报告的梳理，详细揭示了这一真空是如何被地方士绅、新式军阀、宗教学者乃至外部势力所填补的。 例如，在蒙古地区，传统的王公贵族在中央权力弱化后，其身份和权力基础面临巨大冲击。本书探讨了他们如何试图利用民族主义思潮或寻求外部（如沙俄或日本）庇护来维持其既有地位，以及新式知识分子如何借机挑战旧有的封建等级制度。研究表明，不同盟旗之间的关系也因外部干预而变得日益复杂，不再是单纯的“中央—地方”二元结构。 第二部分：近代化进程中的地方精英与社会变迁 近代化因素，如新式教育、新式军事、以及经济的初步渗透，对边疆社会的冲击尤为显著。本书将重点放在了“新派”人物的崛起——这些人物往往是接受了新式教育、熟悉现代政治话语的本地精英。 在西藏问题上，本书超越了对“十三世达赖喇嘛回归”这一传统叙事的聚焦，转而深入分析了拉萨在二十世纪初对农奴制度、寺院经济和对外贸易的微观调整。作者考察了拉萨地方政府（噶厦）在财政困境下如何尝试推行有限的改革，以及这些改革如何与保守的寺院势力产生摩擦。通过对地方行政公文的分析，我们得以窥见一个试图在传统与现代之间寻找平衡的治理实体。 在新疆，本书探讨了新军的建立和新式边防的部署如何改变了绿营、伯克等传统组织的功能。新政的推行并非一帆风顺，它常常在执行层面与当地的宗教信仰、部族习俗产生剧烈冲突。作者特别关注了1911年至1920年代初，地方实力派人物如何利用“中华民国”的旗号，行使近乎独立的权力，其行为逻辑往往是地方性的，而非严格遵循南京或北京的指令。 第三部分：认同的重塑与国家构建的张力 近代民族主义浪潮对边疆地区的身份认同构成了根本性的挑战。本书的亮点在于对“新中国公民”身份构建过程的细致描摹。作者展示了“汉人”与“边疆少数民族”之间的界限是如何在政治动员和文化宣传中被重新定义和强化的。 在宣传层面，北京的临时政府和后来的北洋政府试图推行“五族共和”的理念，但在实际操作中，往往表现出对主体民族文化的偏向。本书通过分析地方学校的教科书、报刊和官方文告，揭示了地方精英如何解读、接受或抵制这些来自中央的民族建构叙事。 例如，在一些与俄国接壤的地区，当地的知识分子在面对沙俄或后来的布尔什维克政权的影响时，其对“国家”和“民族”的理解就表现出极大的复杂性。他们既可能倾向于融入中华民国的框架，也可能因为中央政府的无力而倾向于地方自治，甚至寻求其他外部庇护。 研究价值： 本书的价值在于其方法论上的突破，它将边疆研究从宏大的政策叙事中解放出来，转向对权力运作的微观、多层次分析。它揭示了在国家构建的过程中，边疆地区并非被动接受者，而是充满能动性的参与者和博弈方。通过对权力、经济和身份认同三重维度的考察，本书为理解近代中国国家形态的复杂性提供了一个更为细致和动态的观察窗口。对于研究近代政治史、社会史以及区域史的学者与读者而言，此书是不可多得的深刻之作。 --- 作者简介： 张鸿儒，知名近代史学家，师从著名历史地理学家，长期致力于中国近代国家形成与边疆治理模式的比较研究。现任职于国内顶尖历史研究所，已出版多部具有影响力的学术专著。

评分☆☆☆☆☆

评分☆☆☆☆☆

评分☆☆☆☆☆

评分☆☆☆☆☆

评分☆☆☆☆☆

评分☆☆☆☆☆

As someone who appreciates historical analysis that grapples with the "why" behind events, the title "晚清政府对新疆、蒙古和西藏政策研究" strikes me as incredibly promising. It suggests an examination not just of *what* policies were implemented, but *why* they were conceived and *how* they were executed. I’m eager to understand the intellectual currents and political pressures that influenced the Qing leadership. Were these policies a coherent, long-term strategy, or were they reactive measures born out of crisis? The concept of "policy" itself can be multifaceted, encompassing everything from military campaigns and frontier defense to economic development, cultural assimilation, and legal frameworks. I anticipate that the book will delve into these various dimensions, offering a comprehensive picture of the Qing state's engagement with these crucial territories. The mere mention of Xinjiang, Mongolia, and Tibet immediately brings to mind their distinct historical trajectories and complex relationships with the central Chinese state. I’m particularly interested in how the Qing government navigated the unique challenges presented by each region, considering their distinct ethnic compositions, religious beliefs, and existing political structures. Was there a discernible difference in approach between, say, their policies in Xinjiang versus their policies in Tibet? The book's title implies a comparative element, which is precisely what I find most intellectually stimulating. I want to understand the nuances, the variations, and the underlying principles that guided the Qing administration in its dealings with these vast and often distant territories. The book's potential to shed light on the evolving nature of Chinese sovereignty and territorial integrity during this pivotal era is a significant draw.

评分☆☆☆☆☆

Honestly, the title "晚清政府对新疆、蒙古和西藏政策研究" immediately conjures up images of dusty archives and dense academic prose. However, beyond the academic jargon, I see it as a window into a critical period of Chinese history, a time when the very definition of China's borders and its national identity was being forged and contested. I'm not a historian by training, but I've always been drawn to the human element within grand historical narratives. My hope is that this book, while rigorous in its research, will also offer compelling stories and insights into the individuals who shaped these policies and the people whose lives were profoundly affected by them. I'm curious about the motivations behind the Qing court's actions – were they driven by genuine imperial ambition, by fear of external encroachment, or by a complex mix of both? Furthermore, how did the local populations in Xinjiang, Mongolia, and Tibet perceive and respond to these policies? Did they see themselves as subjects of the Qing empire, or did they harbor different loyalties and aspirations? The title suggests a focus on policy, but policy is enacted by people and affects people. I'm hoping for a narrative that bridges the gap between high-level strategic decisions and the lived realities on the ground. It’s the echoes of those decisions in the present that often intrigue me most. I wonder how the legacies of these policies continue to resonate in contemporary China and its relationship with these regions. The sheer scale of the geographical areas mentioned suggests that the challenges of communication, transportation, and information dissemination would have been immense, adding another layer of complexity to any administrative undertaking. I’m particularly keen to understand the differing approaches taken towards each region, as their historical trajectories, cultural compositions, and geographical locations were far from uniform.

评分☆☆☆☆☆

The title, "晚清政府对新疆、蒙古和西藏政策研究," immediately struck a chord with me as a reader fascinated by the intricate machinations of imperial power and its eventual unraveling. What draws me in is the promise of a deep exploration into how a once-mighty empire, on the cusp of collapse, navigated the complex terrains of its vast frontier territories. I'm not just looking for a chronological account of events, but an in-depth analysis of the *policies* themselves. What were the Qing dynasty's objectives in Xinjiang, Mongolia, and Tibet during this critical period? Were they driven by a desperate attempt to maintain territorial integrity, a strategic response to growing foreign influence, or perhaps a desire to harness the resources of these regions? The book's scope, encompassing these three distinct yet interconnected areas, suggests a comparative study, and I'm eager to see how the author differentiates and connects the Qing's approaches to each. For example, how did the unique cultural, religious, and political landscapes of Xinjiang, Mongolia, and Tibet influence the imperial response? The title implies a scholarly undertaking, and I am anticipating a work that will meticulously examine primary sources and offer insightful interpretations, shedding light on the practical implementation of these policies, their intended consequences, and their often unintended repercussions on the ground. Understanding how the Qing government attempted to govern these distant and diverse populations is, for me, crucial to understanding the broader narrative of China's evolution and its place in the world.

评分☆☆☆☆☆

The phrase "晚清政府对新疆、蒙古和西藏政策研究" instantly sparks my imagination about the vastness and complexity of imperial governance in a period of significant transition. I'm not just looking for a simple historical overview, but a deep exploration of the strategic decisions, the administrative mechanisms, and the underlying philosophies that guided the Qing dynasty in its dealings with these crucial frontier regions. The title suggests a comprehensive and analytical approach, and I'm anticipating an examination that delves into the nuances of Qing policy. How did the imperial court balance the need for control with the realities of distance and local diversity? What were the primary objectives behind their policies – territorial integrity, resource acquisition, cultural assimilation, or a combination of these? The inclusion of Xinjiang, Mongolia, and Tibet in the same study is particularly intriguing, as these regions represent distinct historical trajectories and relationships with the central government. I'm eager to understand the author's perspective on how Qing policies might have differed or converged across these varied territories, considering their unique ethnic compositions, religious influences, and geopolitical significance. The term "research" in the title implies a solid foundation in historical evidence and scholarly interpretation, and I'm looking forward to a work that offers insightful analysis and a nuanced understanding of a critical period in Chinese history, one that profoundly shaped the territorial and political landscape of the region. I’m especially curious about how the Qing’s policies were received by the local populations and what were the long-term consequences of these imperial endeavors.

评分☆☆☆☆☆

这本书的标题——《晚清政府对新疆、蒙古和西藏政策研究》——立刻勾起了我对中国近代史 Those tumultuous years, particularly the intricate dynamics of imperial decline and territorial integrity, have always fascinated me. The sheer scope implied by the title, encompassing three vast and strategically crucial regions, suggests a monumental undertaking. I'm particularly eager to delve into how the Qing government, already grappling with internal rebellions and external pressures, attempted to assert or maintain its authority over these frontier territories. The complexities of governing such diverse populations, with their unique cultural identities and political aspirations, must have presented formidable challenges. I anticipate that the book will illuminate the various strategies employed, from military interventions and administrative reforms to diplomatic maneuvers and economic policies. Understanding the successes and failures of these policies is paramount to grasping the trajectory of China’s territorial sovereignty and the seeds of future national identity. The book's title promises a deep dive into a period of intense geopolitical flux, where the fate of these regions was inextricably linked to the survival of the Qing dynasty itself. I'm hoping for a nuanced portrayal that avoids simplistic narratives and instead embraces the multifaceted nature of historical events, providing insights into the motivations, constraints, and consequences of Qing policies in these vital borderlands. The interplay between central authority and local dynamics, the role of ethnic and religious factors, and the impact of foreign powers are all aspects I expect to be thoroughly explored. It's a topic that demands careful consideration of primary sources and scholarly analysis, and I'm looking forward to seeing how this book synthesizes that material.

评分☆☆☆☆☆

The title "晚清政府对新疆、蒙古和西藏政策研究" immediately conjures up images of a vast empire at a critical juncture, and I'm drawn to understanding the intricate ways in which power was exercised and contested in its furthest reaches. My interest isn't simply in cataloging decrees, but in grasping the underlying logic and the practical realities of Qing governance over Xinjiang, Mongolia, and Tibet. I'm particularly fascinated by the challenges inherent in administering such geographically expansive and culturally distinct territories, especially during the twilight years of the dynasty when internal stability was fragile and external pressures were mounting. What were the primary motivations behind the Qing’s policies in these regions? Was it a concerted effort to strengthen imperial control, a defensive reaction to foreign encroachment, or a complex interplay of both? The title implies a scholarly approach, and I'm hoping for a detailed analysis that examines the specific policies enacted, their intended outcomes, and their actual impact on the ground. The comparative aspect of studying Xinjiang, Mongolia, and Tibet together is highly appealing, as it suggests an exploration of the diverse strategies employed to manage different populations and geopolitical realities. I'm eager to learn about the administrative structures, the military deployments, the economic incentives, and the cultural initiatives that characterized Qing policy in these vital borderlands. The book's potential to illuminate how the Qing government grappled with issues of sovereignty, autonomy, and identity in its frontier regions is precisely what makes this topic so compelling.

评分☆☆☆☆☆

The title, "晚清政府对新疆、蒙古和西藏政策研究," immediately triggers a sense of intrigue regarding the historical mechanisms of imperial control and, perhaps more importantly, its limitations. I'm not looking for a dry recitation of facts, but rather a nuanced exploration of how a vast empire, in its twilight years, attempted to govern regions so geographically and culturally distinct from its core. My curiosity is piqued by the inherent difficulties of such an endeavor. How did the Qing dynasty, facing internal fragmentation and increasing external threats, manage to formulate and implement policies across such expansive territories like Xinjiang, Mongolia, and Tibet? I’m particularly interested in the practicalities of governance: the logistical challenges, the communication networks (or lack thereof), and the effectiveness of bureaucratic structures in remote areas. Furthermore, the book’s title suggests an examination of the Qing's strategic thinking. Were these policies primarily driven by a desire to secure territorial integrity, exploit resources, or perhaps exert cultural influence? Or was it a combination of these factors, constantly shifting in response to the evolving geopolitical landscape? The fact that the book focuses on three distinct regions implies a comparative approach, which I find essential for understanding the complexities of Qing imperial policy. Each region – Xinjiang with its Silk Road heritage and diverse ethnic groups, Mongolia with its nomadic traditions and historical ties to the Qing, and Tibet with its unique religious and political system – would have presented unique challenges and demanded specific strategies. I am hoping for a detailed account that goes beyond broad generalizations and explores the specific policies enacted, their intended outcomes, and their actual impact on the ground, while also considering the perspectives of the local populations.

评分☆☆☆☆☆

The title "晚清政府对新疆、蒙古和西藏政策研究" immediately signals a deep dive into a complex and often overlooked aspect of Chinese history. What draws me in is the inherent challenge the Qing government faced in attempting to govern such geographically vast and culturally diverse regions during its declining years. My interest lies not just in enumerating policies, but in understanding the motivations, constraints, and consequences of those policies. I’m curious about the Qing court’s perception of these territories: were they viewed primarily as strategic buffer zones, sources of resources, or integral parts of the imperial realm? The book’s focus on Xinjiang, Mongolia, and Tibet suggests a comparative dimension, and I’m eager to see how the author analyzes the differences and similarities in Qing approaches to each. For instance, how did the Qing administration adapt its policies to the unique socio-political structures and religious landscapes of each region? The title implies a rigorous examination of historical records, and I'm hoping for an account that is both scholarly and engaging, one that brings to life the complexities of imperial administration and its impact on the lives of people in these frontier regions. The late Qing period was a time of immense upheaval, and understanding how the government attempted to maintain its grip on these peripheral areas is crucial for comprehending the broader trajectory of Chinese state-building and the evolution of its territorial boundaries. I’m particularly keen to explore the interplay between central authority and local autonomy, and how external pressures, such as the ambitions of neighboring powers, might have influenced Qing policies.

评分☆☆☆☆☆

When I saw the title "晚清政府对新疆、蒙古和西藏政策研究," my immediate thought was about the intricate tapestry of power dynamics that defined late imperial China. I’m drawn to the idea of understanding how a ruling elite, increasingly challenged by both internal dissent and external forces, attempted to maintain control over territories that were not just geographically distant but also possessed distinct cultural and political identities. The very act of "policy" implies a level of intention and strategy, and I'm keen to explore what those intentions were. Was it about consolidating imperial power, preventing foreign encroachment, or perhaps fostering a sense of shared identity within the empire? The book's focus on Xinjiang, Mongolia, and Tibet is particularly compelling, as these regions represent diverse historical experiences and relationships with the Qing court. I'm eager to understand the specific approaches taken towards each: were they treated as integral parts of the empire, as tributary states, or something else entirely? The challenges of governance in such vast and diverse regions must have been immense, and I hope the book will shed light on the practicalities of administration, the role of local intermediaries, and the impact of these policies on the lives of the people living there. The term "research" in the title suggests a deep dive into primary sources and a rigorous analytical framework, which is exactly what I look for in historical scholarship. I'm anticipating a work that will offer a nuanced and comprehensive understanding of a critical period, one that shaped not only the fate of the Qing dynasty but also the territorial and ethnic contours of modern China.

评分☆☆☆☆☆

The title "晚清政府对新疆、蒙古和西藏政策研究" immediately piqued my interest because it addresses a period of immense geopolitical flux and the complex formation of China's modern borders. I'm keen to understand the intellectual and practical challenges faced by the Qing government in trying to assert its authority over such vast and diverse territories during its final decades. My primary curiosity revolves around the "policy" aspect: what were the specific strategies employed, and what were the underlying rationales? Were these policies driven by a coherent vision of imperial expansion, a defensive posture against foreign powers, or reactive measures born out of immediate crises? The inclusion of Xinjiang, Mongolia, and Tibet suggests a comparative study, and I am particularly eager to explore how the Qing administration adapted its approach to the unique socio-cultural and political contexts of each region. For instance, the distinct historical relationships and governance models in each area must have necessitated differentiated policies. The title implies a rigorous academic inquiry, and I anticipate a work that will go beyond surface-level descriptions to offer a nuanced analysis of the successes, failures, and long-term consequences of Qing policies. I'm hoping to gain a deeper appreciation for the complexities of managing a multi-ethnic empire, the interplay of central authority and local dynamics, and how these historical policies continue to shape contemporary understandings of territorial integrity and national identity. The sheer scale of these regions also makes me wonder about the logistical and informational hurdles faced by the Qing bureaucracy.

评分☆☆☆☆☆

评分☆☆☆☆☆

评分☆☆☆☆☆

评分☆☆☆☆☆

评分☆☆☆☆☆