尼爾·弗格森，英國最著名的曆史學傢之一。哈佛大學曆史係教授、牛津大學耶穌學院高級研究員，同時也是斯坦福大學鬍佛研究所的高級研究員。他是極少數能橫跨學術界、金融界和媒體的專傢之一。著有暢銷書《文明》、《帝國》、《虛擬的曆史》、《頂級金融傢》、《紙與鐵》、《金錢交易》、《戰爭的悲憫》、《巨人》、《貨幣崛起》、《羅斯柴爾德傢族》，同時還為多傢報紙和雜誌撰稿。此外，他還為第四頻道撰寫並製作瞭五部非常成功的電視紀錄片：《帝國》、《美國巨人》、《世界戰爭》、《貨幣崛起》和《文明》。2004年被《時代》周刊評為“影響世界的100人”之一。

A landmark work of history that challenges our most basic assumptions about the causes and consequences of the First World War In The Pity of War, Niall Ferguson makes a simple and provocative argument: that the human atrocity known as the Great War was entirely England's fault. Britain, according to Ferguson, entered into war based on nave assumptions of German aims-and England's entry into the war transformed a Continental conflict into a world war, which they then badly mishandled, necessitating American involvement. The war was not inevitable, Ferguson argues, but rather the result of the mistaken decisions of individuals who would later claim to have been in the grip of huge impersonal forces. That the war was wicked, horrific, inhuman, is memorialized in part by the poetry of men like Wilfred Owen and Siegfried Sassoon, but also by cold statistics. More British soldiers were killed in the first day of the Battle of the Somme than Americans in the Vietnam War; indeed, the total British fatalities in that single battle-some 420,000-exceeds the entire American fatalities for both World Wars. And yet, as Ferguson writes, while the war itself was a disastrous folly, the great majority of men who fought it did so with enthusiasm. Ferguson vividly brings back to life this terrifying period, not through dry citation of chronological chapter and verse but through a series of brilliant chapters focusing on key ways in which we now view the First World War. For anyone wanting to understand why wars are fought, why men are willing to fight them, and why the world is as it is today, there is no sharper nor more stimulating guide than Niall Ferguson's The Pity of War.