The Great Recession has prompted a reassessment of the specific mode of capitalist accumulation that achieved dominance in the era of globalization. Yet just about all of this literature has focused on one of two issues: why things went wrong, and what we need to do in order to return the system to stability. Outside of a contingent of radical socialists on the fringes of the debate, virtually no one questioned whether capitalism could continue. In Does Capitalism Have a Future?, the prominent theorist Georgi Derleugian has gathered together a quintet of eminent macrosociologists to assess whether the capitalist system can survive.
The prevalent common wisdom, for all its current gloom, nevertheless safely assumes that capitalism cannot break down permanently because there is no alternative. The authors shatter this assumption, arguing that this generalization is not supported by theory but is rather an outgrowth of the optimistic nineteenth-century claim that human history ascends through stages to an enlightened equilibrium of liberal capitalism. Yet as they point out, just about all major historical systems have broken down in the end (e.g., the Roman empire). In the modern epoch there have been several cataclysmic events-notably the French revolution, World War I, and the collapse of the Soviet bloc-that came to pass mainly because contemporary political elites had spectacularly failed to calculate the consequences of the processes they presumed to govern. At present, none of our governing elites and very few of our intellectuals can fathom an ending to our current reigning system. Considering whether a collapse is possible is the task that the quintet-Derleugian, Michael Mann, Randall Collins, Craig Calhoun, and Immanuel Wallerstein-sets out to explore. While all of the contributors arrive at different conclusions, they are in constant dialogue with each other and therefore able to construct relatively seamless-if open-ended-whole. For instance, Wallerstein (who accurately predicted the collapse of the Soviet system in 1979) and Collins, identify fatal structural faults in twenty-first century capitalism. Mann, on the other hand, does not think that there is any serious alternative to the market dynamic, but he does identify other serious threats to the system, including environmental degradation. Calhoun and Derluguian are more circumspect and focus on the role of politics in steering the system toward either revival or collapse.
This most ambitious of books, written by the highest caliber of sociologists, asks the biggest of questions: are we on the cusp of a radical world historical shift or not?
Immanuel Wallerstein is Senior Research Scholar at Yale and founder of the Fernand Braudel Center at Binghamton University.
Randall Collins is Dorothy Swaine Thomas Professor of Sociology University of Pennsylvania and former President of American Sociological Association.
Michael Mann teaches sociology at UCLA.
Georgi Derluguian teaches Social Research and Public Policy at New York University Abu Dhabi.
Craig Calhoun is Director of the London School of Economics.
非常有益的讨论。 沃勒斯坦和柯林斯还是想象得太悲观了些,结构性失业的同时也在经历着结构性缺工,毕竟对于大多数国家成本外化并不是容易的事情,但是为难的是谁会主动去做承受最重压力的底层呢?而地球在最近几十年就要承载不下资本主义的扩张也恐怕还不至于,在更立体的层面...
评分在社会主义的社会谈论资本主义,总是一叶障目,这本书的名字是《资本主义还有未来吗》,看起来似乎是对资本主义社会的怀疑和否定,但是作者确有自己独到的简介。 伊曼纽尔•沃勒斯坦是“世界体系”理论的创始人和主要代表人物,其四卷本《现代世界体系》(1974-2011),是他...
评分起初是封面吸引了我,很有历史味道。同样,书的名称也正是我多年来不停寻找的答案的疑问句。资本主义在经历了轰轰烈烈的革命之后,在体验了经济的快速发展与衰退之后,资本主义貌似也走到了命运的十字路口,未来发展的道路在哪里?背负着最初的革命信念,又该如何找到正确的出...
评分根据资本主义世界一次一次爆发的经济危机,资本主义的现状与未来成为一个焦点话题。作者汇集各家的观点及历史事件做出宏观研究,对未来可能的大变化引发众人的思考。在我内心还是比较喜欢求同存异,只有多元才能丰富!
评分女儿拿回家一本书,《资本主义还有未来吗?》作者是国外五位在社会学和经济学当代知名的学者,伊曼纽尔.沃勒斯坦,生于1930年,曾任国际社会学协会主席,退休后任耶鲁大学高级研究员。第二位作者兰德尔.柯林斯,生于1941年,现任美国宾夕法尼亚大学社会学教授。后三位就不一一...
关于“资本主义”,已有众多经济学家、社会学家曾经对于它的未来进行分析,福山曾经说过资本主义社会是人类历史的终结,马克思和熊彼特曾经从不同角度论证它必将被社会主义所代替,约翰.罗默 曾经写过《社会主义的未来》,本书的几位作者作为社会学家也给出了自己的阐述,本书已经有中译版
评分关于“资本主义”,已有众多经济学家、社会学家曾经对于它的未来进行分析,福山曾经说过资本主义社会是人类历史的终结,马克思和熊彼特曾经从不同角度论证它必将被社会主义所代替,约翰.罗默 曾经写过《社会主义的未来》,本书的几位作者作为社会学家也给出了自己的阐述,本书已经有中译版
评分关于“资本主义”,已有众多经济学家、社会学家曾经对于它的未来进行分析,福山曾经说过资本主义社会是人类历史的终结,马克思和熊彼特曾经从不同角度论证它必将被社会主义所代替,约翰.罗默 曾经写过《社会主义的未来》,本书的几位作者作为社会学家也给出了自己的阐述,本书已经有中译版
评分关于“资本主义”,已有众多经济学家、社会学家曾经对于它的未来进行分析,福山曾经说过资本主义社会是人类历史的终结,马克思和熊彼特曾经从不同角度论证它必将被社会主义所代替,约翰.罗默 曾经写过《社会主义的未来》,本书的几位作者作为社会学家也给出了自己的阐述,本书已经有中译版
评分关于“资本主义”,已有众多经济学家、社会学家曾经对于它的未来进行分析,福山曾经说过资本主义社会是人类历史的终结,马克思和熊彼特曾经从不同角度论证它必将被社会主义所代替,约翰.罗默 曾经写过《社会主义的未来》,本书的几位作者作为社会学家也给出了自己的阐述,本书已经有中译版
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2026 book.wenda123.org All Rights Reserved. 图书目录大全 版权所有