Despite the fact that its capital city and over one third of its territory was within the continent of Europe, the Ottoman Empire has consistently been regarded as a place apart, inextricably divided from the West by differences of culture and religion. A perception of its militarism, its barbarism, its tyranny, the sexual appetites of its rulers and its pervasive exoticism has led historians to measure the Ottoman world against a western standard and find it lacking. In recent decades, a dynamic and convincing scholarship has emerged that seeks to comprehend and, in the process, to de-exoticize this enduring realm. Dan Goffman provides a thorough introduction to the history and institutions of the Ottoman Empire from this new standpoint, and presents a claim for its inclusion in Europe. His lucid and engaging book - an important addition to New Approaches to European History - will be essential reading for undergraduates
具体描述
读后感
评分
评分
评分
评分
用户评价
说学术吧，一点正常的原始资料都没有，说科普吧，一堆德法拉阿土语单词充斥其中。史实错误也有，永远分不清罗马4跟6，语言奇葩，史观更奇葩，什么叫做因为拉丁人偷的多土耳其人偷的少所以就不能太责怪后者的侵略，可读性非常差，就是一直在不停叙述逼逼……
评分说学术吧，一点正常的原始资料都没有，说科普吧，一堆德法拉阿土语单词充斥其中。史实错误也有，永远分不清罗马4跟6，语言奇葩，史观更奇葩，什么叫做因为拉丁人偷的多土耳其人偷的少所以就不能太责怪后者的侵略，可读性非常差，就是一直在不停叙述逼逼……
评分说学术吧，一点正常的原始资料都没有，说科普吧，一堆德法拉阿土语单词充斥其中。史实错误也有，永远分不清罗马4跟6，语言奇葩，史观更奇葩，什么叫做因为拉丁人偷的多土耳其人偷的少所以就不能太责怪后者的侵略，可读性非常差，就是一直在不停叙述逼逼……
评分打破欧洲中心主义的讲义集-通史
评分打破欧洲中心主义的讲义集-通史
相关图书
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息，本站不存储任何数据与内容，任何内容与数据均与本站无关，如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度，google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.wenda123.org All Rights Reserved. 图书目录大全 版权所有