具体描述
读后感
评分
评分
评分
评分
用户评价
To ask the question, “What is cinema?” is to also open up in new ways the broader question of what is art.
评分有件事情没明白：既然知道理论和哲学是两回事，为何没有深究两者的关系？“后理论”的批判对象都是法国理论。“电影哲学”似乎就是要避免法国理论的各种语言，不过既然要使用哲学的语言，就要把“电影理论”归入美学范畴。文学理论的衰落似乎不是一个套路，后半部分终于提到了“理论”，不过有没有解决两者的问题？说完理论系谱的历史断层远比我们想象的要严重，开始梳理结构主义、形式主义的历史了。
评分The revisitation of Metz's contribution to cinema studies is insightful and meticulously written, giving the grand master of French film theory a completely new face. By pointing out Metz's relations to previous disciplines (filmology and Formalism, Mitry, Bazin) and his own cinephiliac tendencies, Rodowick did show us a hidden great heritage to us
评分The revisitation of Metz's contribution to cinema studies is insightful and meticulously written, giving the grand master of French film theory a completely new face. By pointing out Metz's relations to previous disciplines (filmology and Formalism, Mitry, Bazin) and his own cinephiliac tendencies, Rodowick did show us a hidden great heritage to us
评分The revisitation of Metz's contribution to cinema studies is insightful and meticulously written, giving the grand master of French film theory a completely new face. By pointing out Metz's relations to previous disciplines (filmology and Formalism, Mitry, Bazin) and his own cinephiliac tendencies, Rodowick did show us a hidden great heritage to us
相关图书
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息，本站不存储任何数据与内容，任何内容与数据均与本站无关，如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度，google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.wenda123.org All Rights Reserved. 图书目录大全 版权所有