具體描述
讀後感
評分
評分
評分
評分
用戶評價
有件事情沒明白：既然知道理論和哲學是兩迴事，為何沒有深究兩者的關係？“後理論”的批判對象都是法國理論。“電影哲學”似乎就是要避免法國理論的各種語言，不過既然要使用哲學的語言，就要把“電影理論”歸入美學範疇。文學理論的衰落似乎不是一個套路，後半部分終於提到瞭“理論”，不過有沒有解決兩者的問題？說完理論係譜的曆史斷層遠比我們想象的要嚴重，開始梳理結構主義、形式主義的曆史瞭。
评分The revisitation of Metz's contribution to cinema studies is insightful and meticulously written, giving the grand master of French film theory a completely new face. By pointing out Metz's relations to previous disciplines (filmology and Formalism, Mitry, Bazin) and his own cinephiliac tendencies, Rodowick did show us a hidden great heritage to us
评分The revisitation of Metz's contribution to cinema studies is insightful and meticulously written, giving the grand master of French film theory a completely new face. By pointing out Metz's relations to previous disciplines (filmology and Formalism, Mitry, Bazin) and his own cinephiliac tendencies, Rodowick did show us a hidden great heritage to us
评分The revisitation of Metz's contribution to cinema studies is insightful and meticulously written, giving the grand master of French film theory a completely new face. By pointing out Metz's relations to previous disciplines (filmology and Formalism, Mitry, Bazin) and his own cinephiliac tendencies, Rodowick did show us a hidden great heritage to us
评分To ask the question, “What is cinema?” is to also open up in new ways the broader question of what is art.
相關圖書
本站所有內容均為互聯網搜索引擎提供的公開搜索信息，本站不存儲任何數據與內容，任何內容與數據均與本站無關，如有需要請聯繫相關搜索引擎包括但不限於百度，google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 qciss.net All Rights Reserved. 小哈圖書下載中心 版权所有