Product Description
In this groundbreaking book, Kahn uses modern cultural theory to investigate America's most profound political myth: the belief that the rule of law is rule by the people. Kahn explores the elements of the myth, the rhetoric of law that sustains the myth, and the world of meaning the myth creates. He shows us that law must be central to religious, anthropological, and philosophical studies of American life.
From the Back Cover
"A brilliantly innovative and provocative work of pathfinding dimensions." -- Robert M. Ireland, Journal of the Early Republic
"No scholar of the American constitution or American history can afford not to read this book -- at least twice." -- Herbert A. Johnson, Law and History Review
"Kahn is clearly a scholar of great intelligence and creativity." -- Scott D. Gerber, Journal of American History
具体描述
读后感
评分
评分
评分
评分
用户评价
以Marbury v. Madison为枢纽，分析the rule of law的信仰是何以在”the people”取代”God”成为政治权威来源的当代所实现的。Marbury一案的意义不仅仅是成为美国法院judicial review的正当性来源，Paul W. Kahn将该案放在法律与革命、法律与政治的大框架下考察，基于该案法院观点所提出的三个问题对political action与the rule of law的并置，以揭示法院在修辞中将自身作为人民与宪法之间的连接点（或曰，法院戴上”the representation of people”的话术面具），从而自我赋权the power to shift the point at which law confronts action。
评分以Marbury v. Madison为枢纽，分析the rule of law的信仰是何以在”the people”取代”God”成为政治权威来源的当代所实现的。Marbury一案的意义不仅仅是成为美国法院judicial review的正当性来源，Paul W. Kahn将该案放在法律与革命、法律与政治的大框架下考察，基于该案法院观点所提出的三个问题对political action与the rule of law的并置，以揭示法院在修辞中将自身作为人民与宪法之间的连接点（或曰，法院戴上”the representation of people”的话术面具），从而自我赋权the power to shift the point at which law confronts action。
评分以Marbury v. Madison为枢纽，分析the rule of law的信仰是何以在”the people”取代”God”成为政治权威来源的当代所实现的。Marbury一案的意义不仅仅是成为美国法院judicial review的正当性来源，Paul W. Kahn将该案放在法律与革命、法律与政治的大框架下考察，基于该案法院观点所提出的三个问题对political action与the rule of law的并置，以揭示法院在修辞中将自身作为人民与宪法之间的连接点（或曰，法院戴上”the representation of people”的话术面具），从而自我赋权the power to shift the point at which law confronts action。
评分以Marbury v. Madison为枢纽，分析the rule of law的信仰是何以在”the people”取代”God”成为政治权威来源的当代所实现的。Marbury一案的意义不仅仅是成为美国法院judicial review的正当性来源，Paul W. Kahn将该案放在法律与革命、法律与政治的大框架下考察，基于该案法院观点所提出的三个问题对political action与the rule of law的并置，以揭示法院在修辞中将自身作为人民与宪法之间的连接点（或曰，法院戴上”the representation of people”的话术面具），从而自我赋权the power to shift the point at which law confronts action。
评分以Marbury v. Madison为枢纽，分析the rule of law的信仰是何以在”the people”取代”God”成为政治权威来源的当代所实现的。Marbury一案的意义不仅仅是成为美国法院judicial review的正当性来源，Paul W. Kahn将该案放在法律与革命、法律与政治的大框架下考察，基于该案法院观点所提出的三个问题对political action与the rule of law的并置，以揭示法院在修辞中将自身作为人民与宪法之间的连接点（或曰，法院戴上”the representation of people”的话术面具），从而自我赋权the power to shift the point at which law confronts action。
相关图书
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息，本站不存储任何数据与内容，任何内容与数据均与本站无关，如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度，google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.wenda123.org All Rights Reserved. 图书目录大全 版权所有