The history of the book in 19th Century Japan follows an uneven course that resists the simple chronology often used to mark a divide between pre-modern and modern literary history. By examining the obscured histories of publication, circulation, and reception of widely consumed literary works from late Edo to the early Meiji period, Jonathan Zwicker traces a genealogy of the literary field across a long 19th Century: one that stresses continuities between the generic conventions of early modern fiction and the modern novel. In the literature of sentiment Zwicker locates a tear-streaked lens through which to view literary practices and readerly expectations that evolved across the century. "Practices of the Sentimental Imagination" emphasises both qualitative and quantitative aspects of literary production and consumption, balancing close readings of canonical and non-canonical texts, sophisticated applications of critical theory, and careful archival research into the holdings of 19th Century lending libraries and private collections. By exploring the relationships between and among Japanese literary works and texts from late imperial China, Europe, and America, Zwicker also situates the Japanese novel within a larger literary history of the novel across the global 19th Century.
评分
评分
评分
评分
没给Zwicker的书满分lol 有种trying to accomplish too much的感觉 但单分析theoretical basis还是很对我口味的 我不愧是跟他学了两年的人(cue Jameson)???? methodology可能比较questionable 这大概也是涉及distant reading的研究都无法避免的 但close reading的部分很有价值 然后作为一个不熟悉late Edo和early Meiji的人这本书很多地方都很informative 给四星大概还是因为感觉有点松散吧 这书的bibliography基本就是我early modern部分的reading list了吧嗯????
评分没给Zwicker的书满分lol 有种trying to accomplish too much的感觉 但单分析theoretical basis还是很对我口味的 我不愧是跟他学了两年的人(cue Jameson)???? methodology可能比较questionable 这大概也是涉及distant reading的研究都无法避免的 但close reading的部分很有价值 然后作为一个不熟悉late Edo和early Meiji的人这本书很多地方都很informative 给四星大概还是因为感觉有点松散吧 这书的bibliography基本就是我early modern部分的reading list了吧嗯????
评分没给Zwicker的书满分lol 有种trying to accomplish too much的感觉 但单分析theoretical basis还是很对我口味的 我不愧是跟他学了两年的人(cue Jameson)???? methodology可能比较questionable 这大概也是涉及distant reading的研究都无法避免的 但close reading的部分很有价值 然后作为一个不熟悉late Edo和early Meiji的人这本书很多地方都很informative 给四星大概还是因为感觉有点松散吧 这书的bibliography基本就是我early modern部分的reading list了吧嗯????
评分没给Zwicker的书满分lol 有种trying to accomplish too much的感觉 但单分析theoretical basis还是很对我口味的 我不愧是跟他学了两年的人(cue Jameson)???? methodology可能比较questionable 这大概也是涉及distant reading的研究都无法避免的 但close reading的部分很有价值 然后作为一个不熟悉late Edo和early Meiji的人这本书很多地方都很informative 给四星大概还是因为感觉有点松散吧 这书的bibliography基本就是我early modern部分的reading list了吧嗯????
评分没给Zwicker的书满分lol 有种trying to accomplish too much的感觉 但单分析theoretical basis还是很对我口味的 我不愧是跟他学了两年的人(cue Jameson)???? methodology可能比较questionable 这大概也是涉及distant reading的研究都无法避免的 但close reading的部分很有价值 然后作为一个不熟悉late Edo和early Meiji的人这本书很多地方都很informative 给四星大概还是因为感觉有点松散吧 这书的bibliography基本就是我early modern部分的reading list了吧嗯????
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.wenda123.org All Rights Reserved. 图书目录大全 版权所有