Maurice Blanchot, the eminent literary and cultural critic, has had a vast influence on contemporary French writers - among them are Jean Paul Sartre and Jacques Derrida. From the 1930s through the present day, his writings have been shaping the international literary consciousness. "The Space of Literature", first published in France in 1955, is central to the development of Blanchot's thought. In it, he reflects on literature and the unique demand it makes upon our attention. Thus he explores the process of reading as well as the nature of artistic creativity, all the while considering the relation of the literary work to time, to history, and to death. This book consists not so much in the application of a critical method or the demonstration of a theory of literature as in a patiently deliberate meditation upon the literary experience, informed most notably by studies of Mallarme, Kafka, Rilke, and Holderlin. Blanchot's discussions of those writers are among the finest in any language. Ann Smock's fluent translation retains the tone and sense of the French; her introduction situates Blanchot in the French and American cultural spectrum and outlines the history of his critical concerns. Ann Smock, an associate professor of French at the University of California, Berkeley, also translated Blanchot's "The Writing of the Disaster" for the University of Nebraska Press in 1986.
具体描述
读后感
实在忍不住要说，商务印书馆的《当代法国思想文化译丛》，真是糟糕得令人无法卒读——单就我读过的《色情史》和《文学空间》而言。 这套丛书，我读了两本，两本都译得糟糕透顶。主编——哦！没有主编——策划人既然能够容忍这么两位翻译人的这么低劣的译本，可想而知其对译文质...
评分忽然发现，自己变成了一个文盲。 曾几何时每天读至少几十页的书是为了活下去必须完成的事情，就像上厕所和吃饭一样。事实上这三件事情完全是绑在一起的——没有书读，在厕所里怎么打发时间？ 然后忽然就出现了一个叫ipad的东西。异军突起的苹果商品让我的空闲时间里充满了呕...
评分实在忍不住要说，商务印书馆的《当代法国思想文化译丛》，真是糟糕得令人无法卒读——单就我读过的《色情史》和《文学空间》而言。 这套丛书，我读了两本，两本都译得糟糕透顶。主编——哦！没有主编——策划人既然能够容忍这么两位翻译人的这么低劣的译本，可想而知其对译文质...
评分这本书的翻译更加验证了我对外语专业的人从事学术翻译及研究的看法，那就是不求甚解，看不懂乱翻。 比如96页处翻译的非常混乱，我实在怀疑有没有人通过中文版真正看懂了该书？
用户评价
不明觉厉的典范！
评分卡夫卡日记中对文学（或在他身体里那个小说家）的复杂心态，由文学转向宗教，Zionism和anti-Zionism的矛盾，从《审判》到《城堡》K.形象的转变。总结：For there exists for him only the outside.
评分读懂文学与死亡
评分只读了Rilke这章。前半部分很清晰，从death transmutes in itself开始好难...personal/disinterested death，death/dying。不愧是死亡哲学本体布朗肖...对Orpheus的分析精彩！Orpheus-Angel的本质区别在于前者是Werden而后者是Gewordensein。哀歌和十四行诗的复杂关系果然相当有趣...
评分只读了Rilke这章。前半部分很清晰，从death transmutes in itself开始好难...personal/disinterested death，death/dying。不愧是死亡哲学本体布朗肖...对Orpheus的分析精彩！Orpheus-Angel的本质区别在于前者是Werden而后者是Gewordensein。哀歌和十四行诗的复杂关系果然相当有趣...
相关图书
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息，本站不存储任何数据与内容，任何内容与数据均与本站无关，如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度，google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.wenda123.org All Rights Reserved. 图书目录大全 版权所有