Walking the Tightrope of Reason 在線電子書 圖書標籤: 哲學
發表於2024-12-25
Walking the Tightrope of Reason 在線電子書 pdf 下載 txt下載 epub 下載 mobi 下載 2024
羅伯特•福格林(Robert Fogelin)
美國達特茅斯學院(Dartmouth College)哲學教授,謝爾曼•費爾柴爾德(Sherman Fairchild)人文學科教授。其他著作包括《皮浪主義反思》(Pyrrhonian Reflections),《維特根斯坦和休謨的懷疑論》(Wittgenstein, and Hume’s Skepticism)。
陳蓉霞
1961年生。1983年畢業於華東師範大學生物學係,獲理學士學位。1986年畢業於華東師範大學自然辯證法研究所,獲哲學碩士學位。現任教於上海師範大學法政學院。著有《進化的階梯》,《破譯生命的密碼》等。譯著有《起源之戰》、《適應與自然選擇》,《隱匿中的奇纔》,《樹梢上的人生》等。
Human beings are both supremely rational and deeply superstitious, capable of believing just about anything and of questioning just about everything. Indeed, just as our reason demands that we know the truth, our skepticism leads to doubts we can ever really do so. In Walking the Tightrope of Reason, Robert J. Fogelin guides readers through a contradiction that lies at the very heart of philosophical inquiry. Fogelin argues that our rational faculties insist on a purely rational account of the universe, yet at the same time, the inherent limitations of these faculties ensure that we will never fully satisfy that demand. As a result of being driven to this point of paradox, we either comfort ourselves with what Kant called "metaphysical illusions" or adopt a stance of radical skepticism. No middle ground seems possible and, as Fogelin shows, skepticism, even though a healthy dose of it is essential for living a rational life, "has an inherent tendency to become unlimited in its scope, with the result that the edifice of rationality is destroyed." In much Postmodernist thought, for example, skepticism takes the extreme form of absolute relativism, denying the basis for any value distinctions and treating all truth-claims as equally groundless. How reason avoids disgracing itself, walking a fine line between dogmatic belief and self-defeating doubt, is the question Fogelin seeks to answer. Reflecting upon the ancient Greek skeptics as well as such thinkers as Hume, Kant, Wittgenstein, Nietzsche, and Whitman, this book takes readers into--and through--some of philosophy's most troubling paradoxes.
之前一直在关注说谎者悖论的东西,读了此书,有豁然开阔之意! 以往总是停留在语言内部,从语义学的角度,看了塔斯基、克里普克、伯奇等人对悖论的解决,虽然自成一家,但也各有纰漏,总不能令人信服。 这本书里的第二章“两难困境和悖论”中对维特根斯坦语言游戏说的引入,让...
評分[只是一篇书摘] "必须坦率地承认,我们所拥有的,原则上来自于希腊的智慧,那类似于知识的童年期,具有童年的特征:能说会道,但不结果实;富有争议,但缺乏成品……还请注意,如果这类科学本身有任何活力,那就决不能能出现这样一种情形,在经过血多待的传承之后,他们几乎仍...
評分理性是根据和结合的一种本性,有了这种性质就有了根据和结合的能力,因此结合和根据就是理性的根本,根据就是具有基础的命题,而结合就是具有合作的意向,因此理性就是具有基础的推测和推理,也就是有根据的思考和思索。这就是理性的来源,因此没有这种理性就没有了具体的思考...
評分理性是根据和结合的一种本性,有了这种性质就有了根据和结合的能力,因此结合和根据就是理性的根本,根据就是具有基础的命题,而结合就是具有合作的意向,因此理性就是具有基础的推测和推理,也就是有根据的思考和思索。这就是理性的来源,因此没有这种理性就没有了具体的思考...
評分这本书虽然读得磕磕绊绊,从南京的高铁读到西藏,再读回广州,却算作是一个很好的对怀疑论、认识论的入门了,对理解休谟、维特根斯坦、康德以至于皮浪的思想都有很大的帮助。 今年非常糟糕的三月里,偶尔读一本书时读到了皮浪主义,当时便对这种怀疑论有一种“不知道从哪里来”...
Walking the Tightrope of Reason 在線電子書 pdf 下載 txt下載 epub 下載 mobi 下載 2024