具體描述
讀後感
評分
評分
評分
評分
用戶評價
Except for the Nietzsche part being very misleading and superficial, it is a suggestive try to see continental philosophers through analytical philosophers' eyes. One should not try to put Nietzsche in this chain.
评分Except for the Nietzsche part being very misleading and superficial, it is a suggestive try to see continental philosophers through analytical philosophers' eyes. One should not try to put Nietzsche in this chain.
评分Except for the Nietzsche part being very misleading and superficial, it is a suggestive try to see continental philosophers through analytical philosophers' eyes. One should not try to put Nietzsche in this chain.
评分Except for the Nietzsche part being very misleading and superficial, it is a suggestive try to see continental philosophers through analytical philosophers' eyes. One should not try to put Nietzsche in this chain.
评分從Kant到Derrida的歐陸哲學史（其實也就鎖定在幾個人：Kant、Hegel、Nietzsche、Heidegger、Foucault、Derrida）。講的最清楚的是Kant，但談的最多的是Heidegger，也許太多瞭一點。Foucault跟Derrida的部份不覺得有特別新奇的論點。
相關圖書
本站所有內容均為互聯網搜索引擎提供的公開搜索信息，本站不存儲任何數據與內容，任何內容與數據均與本站無關，如有需要請聯繫相關搜索引擎包括但不限於百度，google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 qciss.net All Rights Reserved. 小哈圖書下載中心 版权所有