Making Hispanics pdf epub mobi txt 電子書 下載2025
G. Cristina Mora is assistant professor of sociology at the University of California, Berkeley.
- 社會學
- 民族
- 曆史
How did Puerto Ricans, Mexicans, and Cubans become known as “Hispanics” and “Latinos” in the United States? How did several distinct cultures and nationalities become portrayed as one? Cristina Mora answers both these questions and details the scope of this phenomenon in Making Hispanics. She uses an organizational lens and traces how activists, bureaucrats, and media executives in the 1970s and '80s created a new identity category—and by doing so, permanently changed the racial and political landscape of the nation.
Some argue that these cultures are fundamentally similar and that the Spanish language is a natural basis for a unified Hispanic identity. But Mora shows very clearly that the idea of ethnic grouping was historically constructed and institutionalized in the United States. During the 1960 census, reports classified Latin American immigrants as “white,” grouping them with European Americans. Not only was this decision controversial, but also Latino activists claimed that this classification hindered their ability to portray their constituents as underrepresented minorities. Therefore, they called for a separate classification: Hispanic. Once these populations could be quantified, businesses saw opportunities and the media responded. Spanish-language television began to expand its reach to serve the now large, and newly unified, Hispanic community with news and entertainment programming. Through archival research, oral histories, and interviews, Mora reveals the broad, national-level process that led to the emergence of Hispanicity in America.
具體描述
讀後感
評分
評分
評分
評分
用戶評價
勝在好的問題和詳實的史料。theory也算清晰，但沒有比較果然很難齣彩，感覺在generalization上有所欠缺，以及從結果去推動機的思路還是不能完全站住腳。Census officials的動機是什麼？這裏說的有點模糊。
评分勝在好的問題和詳實的史料。theory也算清晰，但沒有比較果然很難齣彩，感覺在generalization上有所欠缺，以及從結果去推動機的思路還是不能完全站住腳。Census officials的動機是什麼？這裏說的有點模糊。
评分勝在好的問題和詳實的史料。theory也算清晰，但沒有比較果然很難齣彩，感覺在generalization上有所欠缺，以及從結果去推動機的思路還是不能完全站住腳。Census officials的動機是什麼？這裏說的有點模糊。
评分勝在好的問題和詳實的史料。theory也算清晰，但沒有比較果然很難齣彩，感覺在generalization上有所欠缺，以及從結果去推動機的思路還是不能完全站住腳。Census officials的動機是什麼？這裏說的有點模糊。
评分勝在好的問題和詳實的史料。theory也算清晰，但沒有比較果然很難齣彩，感覺在generalization上有所欠缺，以及從結果去推動機的思路還是不能完全站住腳。Census officials的動機是什麼？這裏說的有點模糊。
相關圖書
本站所有內容均為互聯網搜索引擎提供的公開搜索信息，本站不存儲任何數據與內容，任何內容與數據均與本站無關，如有需要請聯繫相關搜索引擎包括但不限於百度，google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 qciss.net All Rights Reserved. 小哈圖書下載中心 版权所有