Gregg A. Brazinsky is associate professor of history and international affairs at George Washington University.
Winning the Third World examines afresh the intense and enduring rivalry between the United States and China during the Cold War. Gregg A. Brazinsky shows how both nations fought vigorously to establish their influence in newly independent African and Asian countries. By playing a leadership role in Asia and Africa, China hoped to regain its status in world affairs, but Americans feared that China’s history as a nonwhite, anticolonial nation would make it an even more dangerous threat in the postcolonial world than the Soviet Union. Drawing on a broad array of new archival materials from China and the United States, Brazinsky demonstrates that disrupting China’s efforts to elevate its stature became an important motive behind Washington’s use of both hard and soft power in the “Global South.”
Presenting a detailed narrative of the diplomatic, economic, and cultural competition between Beijing and Washington, Brazinsky offers an important new window for understanding the impact of the Cold War on the Third World. With China’s growing involvement in Asia and Africa in the twenty-first century, this impressive new work of international history has an undeniable relevance to contemporary world affairs and policy making.
评分
评分
评分
评分
其实也是一本精致而从容的历史著作,开门提出论旨,款款进入主题,适当的语境讨论,大量多角度的论证,根据时间和主题罗织章节,最后落到古今比较上。可是,Brazinsky的几个研究给我印象就是很有说服力,但好想不知道该回应什么。这一本从中美竞争的角度来看冷战,指出“地位”是双方试图在第三世界争夺的东西。另一个中朝关系的研究,强调“双边同情”(mutual empathy)仍然是该论域不能忽视的情感元素,不能一味强调冲突。干净、明确,但我就总觉得这要怎么强有力地说服别人说这样的论点和视角是非常重要的呢?
评分中规中矩的平淡,裴斗虎后劲略有不足
评分其实也是一本精致而从容的历史著作,开门提出论旨,款款进入主题,适当的语境讨论,大量多角度的论证,根据时间和主题罗织章节,最后落到古今比较上。可是,Brazinsky的几个研究给我印象就是很有说服力,但好想不知道该回应什么。这一本从中美竞争的角度来看冷战,指出“地位”是双方试图在第三世界争夺的东西。另一个中朝关系的研究,强调“双边同情”(mutual empathy)仍然是该论域不能忽视的情感元素,不能一味强调冲突。干净、明确,但我就总觉得这要怎么强有力地说服别人说这样的论点和视角是非常重要的呢?
评分其实也是一本精致而从容的历史著作,开门提出论旨,款款进入主题,适当的语境讨论,大量多角度的论证,根据时间和主题罗织章节,最后落到古今比较上。可是,Brazinsky的几个研究给我印象就是很有说服力,但好想不知道该回应什么。这一本从中美竞争的角度来看冷战,指出“地位”是双方试图在第三世界争夺的东西。另一个中朝关系的研究,强调“双边同情”(mutual empathy)仍然是该论域不能忽视的情感元素,不能一味强调冲突。干净、明确,但我就总觉得这要怎么强有力地说服别人说这样的论点和视角是非常重要的呢?
评分中规中矩的平淡,裴斗虎后劲略有不足
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.wenda123.org All Rights Reserved. 图书目录大全 版权所有