Too often interviewing is seen as simply a tool for data collection, while in reality it is a complex, subtle process that cannot be separated from the dynamic of the project or from the multiple and changing contexts of everyday life. In posing the question, "what is research for?", "Interviewing and Representation in Qualitative Research" explores the processes of interviewing as itself a project intimately involved in contemporary debates around knowledge, freedom, power, ethics, modernism postmodernism, and globalisation.What makes the book distinctive is its focus on interviewing not just as a tool to be used within other frameworks such as case study, action research, evaluation and surveys, but as an approach to organise a project as a whole, to provide frameworks for organising perspectives on the multiple 'worlds' of everyday life. It is argued that every project, every methodology, every theoretical perspective has its own rhetorical framework that interacts with the 'world' as subject of study or focus for intervention. The interview, as defined in this book, is both the process of constituting and de-constructing world views - it is the inter-view, the place between worlds.Without the 'inter-view' no dialogue and no alternatives as a basis for difference, change, and development would be possible. The inter-view as conceived in the book is fundamental to qualitative research as an emancipatory project. Research practice is thus placed in the context of philosophical, theoretical and methodological debates, taking the reader beyond many introductory texts, making it suitable for all students and researchers who wish to advance the frontiers of their research and engage with contemporary social and political realities.
具体描述
读后感
评分
评分
评分
评分
用户评价
太多无聊的后现代多元思辨。面对这种情况，难道不需要强调真正的“解放性策略”，绝非作者陈词滥调误读后得出的open space for differences, alternative views and contingency,而是坚持一个真正的拉康观点：that it's absurd to pretend all interpretations are possible, there is ONLY ONE GOOD INTERPRETATION?
评分太多无聊的后现代多元思辨。面对这种情况，难道不需要强调真正的“解放性策略”，绝非作者陈词滥调误读后得出的open space for differences, alternative views and contingency,而是坚持一个真正的拉康观点：that it's absurd to pretend all interpretations are possible, there is ONLY ONE GOOD INTERPRETATION?
评分太多无聊的后现代多元思辨。面对这种情况，难道不需要强调真正的“解放性策略”，绝非作者陈词滥调误读后得出的open space for differences, alternative views and contingency,而是坚持一个真正的拉康观点：that it's absurd to pretend all interpretations are possible, there is ONLY ONE GOOD INTERPRETATION?
评分太多无聊的后现代多元思辨。面对这种情况，难道不需要强调真正的“解放性策略”，绝非作者陈词滥调误读后得出的open space for differences, alternative views and contingency,而是坚持一个真正的拉康观点：that it's absurd to pretend all interpretations are possible, there is ONLY ONE GOOD INTERPRETATION?
评分太多无聊的后现代多元思辨。面对这种情况，难道不需要强调真正的“解放性策略”，绝非作者陈词滥调误读后得出的open space for differences, alternative views and contingency,而是坚持一个真正的拉康观点：that it's absurd to pretend all interpretations are possible, there is ONLY ONE GOOD INTERPRETATION?
相关图书
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息，本站不存储任何数据与内容，任何内容与数据均与本站无关，如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度，google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.wenda123.org All Rights Reserved. 图书目录大全 版权所有