'Hoyle and Wallace illustrate with penetrating insight the perverse outcome of tightening management and leadership so much that it leads to three different forms, each with the same five characteristics, of what they call "managerialism": excessive micromanagement of schools in a sometimes futile and self-defeating quest for success' - Tim Brighouse, Times Educational Supplement 'This book is an excellent read about management and leadership in schools. Overall, I felt that this book makes a positive contribution to the debate about the impact of managerialism within public services. I liked the elements that made up the ironic orientation (scepticism, pragmatism and contingency), recognising them in my own experiences in Higher Education, and I liked the way in which the concept of irony was linked to some key concerns as well as positive practices.This is a book that I would thoroughly recommend to anyone interested in leadership and management in schools, but given its broader application, I would also recommend the book to anyone interested in leadership and management in the public sector' - ESCalate Read the full review as posted on the ESCalate website, the Education Subject Centre for the Higher Education Academy 'Eric Hoyle and Mike Wallace are two of the best known writers on educational leadership and management. They have made very significant contributions to organisational theory and its application to education for four decades. This book's focus on ambiguity and irony provides a welcome and timely contrast to the rational assumptions and managerialism which underpin government policy and much academic writing in this field' - Professor Tony Bush, International Educational Leadership Centre, University of Lincoln 'They have brought to centre-stage ideas and concepts which have largely been peripheral in the field, and in doing so have made us look with new lenses at what we need to say about professional work and identity.It has therefore performed a valuable and much needed service, and will provide a major reference point in debates about the future of the education profession' - Mike Bottery, Educational Management, Administration & Leadership 'This in an important book. I wish I had written it, indeed I wish I had the skill, the knowledge and the wit to write it' - Mark Brundrett, Educational Management, Administration & Leadership Why do efforts to improve the quality of education via organizational leadership and management make matters worse in some respects as well as better? In what ways are education professionals responding to such efforts? The authors of this highly original book develop an ironic perspective for analysing the ambiguities and unintended consequences of well-intentioned actions in organizational life, and how these are exacerbated by change. Focusing on school leadership and management, Hoyle and Wallace suggest that major reforms have had limited success because the changes introduced have diverted school staff from their core task of promoting student learning, resulting in dissatisfaction, frustration and stress.They argue that a more temperate approach to leadership and management supported by wise policy-making can create structures that take the strain and reduce stress, encourage autonomy while accepting associated risks, and sponsor moderate experimentation and innovation emerging from communities of professional practice. Educational Leadership and Organizational Irony is essential reading for all concerned with improving education: advanced course students, leaders and managers, trainers, administrators, policy-makers and academics. It also offers insights for the study of public service and business organizations.
评分
评分
评分
评分
我得承认,我对某些章节的阅读体验是带着一丝“被挑战”的意味的。特别是关于“变革的阻力与惯性”那部分,作者似乎对教育系统的惰性有着近乎残酷的洞察。他用了大量的篇幅去解析为什么一个明明数据证明行之有效的新教学法,在推行了三年后,依然只是在少数几个“明星教师”的课堂里昙花一现。我本来以为他会归咎于资源不足或培训不到位,但这本书提供的观点却更深一层:阻力往往并非来自外部的压力,而是源于根深蒂固的职业身份认同和对“已知舒适区”的眷恋。书中引用了几个相当震撼的案例,比如一个深受爱戴的校长,在推行一项旨在提高透明度的改革时,反而遭遇了来自自己长期追随者的抵制,原因竟然是这项改革触及了他们维护“个人专业领地”的本能需求。这种对人性的深刻剖析,让我不得不停下来反思自己过去在推动项目时,是否过分关注了“做了什么”,而忽略了“人们感受到了什么”。它迫使领导者必须学会“先倾听沉默”的艺术。
评分读完这本书,最深刻的感受是,它完全颠覆了我对“强力领导”的传统认知。我以前总觉得,优秀的教育领导者必须是那种能一锤定音、果断决策的“英雄式”人物。但《Educational Leadership》这本书,却反复强调“弱势力量的韧性”和“分散式权威”的价值。它举的例子大多是关于那些看似“软弱”的领导者——那些擅长提问而非给出答案的、那些愿意承担被误解的风险去创造对话空间的管理者。书中对“自我效能感”的讨论也极其细致,它认为一个真正的教育领导者,其核心工作不是解决所有问题,而是确保团队中的每一个人都相信“他们有能力解决接下来的任何一个问题”。这种由内而外、去中心化的领导模式,让我对未来自己角色的定位有了根本性的转变:与其成为光芒万丈的中心,不如成为能让周围的火光变得更亮的引燃者。这是一种更持久、也更少令人精疲力竭的领导哲学。
评分这本书,说实话,拿到手的时候我就抱着一种相当高的期待。毕竟,标题《Educational Leadership》听起来就充满了重量感,仿佛是教育领域的一本“圣经”级别著作。我本来以为它会是一本深入剖析宏观教育政策制定、复杂组织变革理论的学术巨著,那种需要反复研读、时不时停下来做笔记的类型。结果,我发现它在切入点上非常巧妙。它没有一开始就抛出那些佶屈聱牙的理论模型,而是从一个非常接地气的、可以说是“一线教师”都能感同身受的视角开始。比如说,书中花了好大篇幅来探讨“微观权力动态”——这可不是我们通常在管理学教材里读到的那种自上而下的权力结构,而是描述了教室内,资深教师对新教师的潜移默化影响,或者说,跨部门沟通不畅时,某个关键岗位的同事如何能“一言九鼎”地决定一个项目的成败。这种对日常工作场景的细致描摹,让我感到非常亲切,仿佛作者就在我身边,记录着我们每天遇到的那些微妙的人际互动和决策瞬间。它强调的领导力,更多的是一种“关系性”的艺术,而非单纯的行政命令,这对我理解如何在复杂的人群中推动共识,提供了一个全新的、非常实用的框架。
评分从专业的角度来看,这本书在理论引证方面处理得极其成熟老练,它没有堆砌那些花里胡哨的引用列表,而是将前沿的组织行为学、社会心理学理论,像外科手术刀一样精准地植入到具体的教育管理情境中。比如,在讨论“问责制”时,它巧妙地引入了丹尼尔·卡尼曼的“系统一与系统二”思考模式。它论证了过度依赖“系统二”(慢速、理性分析)的问责系统,在瞬息万变的教学环境中往往会失效,因为教师在压力下会退回到依赖“系统一”(快速、直觉反应)。因此,高效的领导力需要设计那些能引导教师直觉做出正确选择的“软性制约”,而非冰冷的惩罚机制。这种跨学科的融合,使得这本书的论述既有学术深度,又具备了极强的实践指导意义。它不是在说教,而是在提供一把高级的分析工具箱。
评分这本书的结构设计简直是教科书级别的——但不是那种枯燥的教材,而是那种精心编排的叙事。它的每一章似乎都是独立却又紧密相连的,就像是搭建一座极其复杂的哥特式建筑,每一块石头都有其特定的支撑作用。我特别欣赏它对“愿景的叙事化”的处理。很多领导力书籍会教你如何写一份漂亮的愿景声明,但这本书关注的是“如何将愿景变成集体记忆”。作者举了一个很有意思的例子,对比了两个学校的战略规划:一个是充满了KPI和流程图的文档,另一个则是一个由校长在多次非正式场合中反复讲述、融合了学校历史和社区故事的“口述历史”。后者在面对危机时表现出了远超前者的韧性。这让我意识到,真正的领导力传播,不是一次性的信息发布,而是一种持续的、融入日常对话的文化构建。它让我开始重新审视我每周例会上的发言,思考我传递的信息是否真的有“讲故事”的力量,而非仅仅是“传达任务”。
评分 评分 评分 评分 评分本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2026 book.wenda123.org All Rights Reserved. 图书目录大全 版权所有