As the first elected black mayor of a major U.S. city, Cleveland's Carl B. Stokes embodied the transformation of the civil rights movement from a vehicle of protest to one of black political power. In this wide-ranging political biography, Leonard N. Moore examines the convictions and alliances that brought Stokes to power. Impelled by the problems plaguing Cleveland's ghettos in the decades following World War II, Stokes and other Clevelanders questioned how the sit-ins and marches of the civil rights movement could correct the exclusionary zoning practices, police brutality, substandard housing, and de facto school segregation that African Americans in the country's northern urban centers viewed as evidence of their oppression. As civil unrest in the country's ghettos turned to violence in the 1960s, Cleveland was one of the first cities to heed the call of Malcolm X's infamous 'The Ballot or the Bullet' speech. Understanding the importance of controlling the city's political system, Cleveland's blacks utilized their substantial voting base to put Stokes in office in 1967. Stokes was committed to showing the country that an African American could be an effective political leader. He employed an ambitious and radically progressive agenda to clean up Cleveland's ghettos, reform law enforcement, move public housing to middle-class neighborhoods, and jump-start black economic power. Hindered by resistance from the black middle class and the Cleveland City Council, spurned by the media and fellow politicians who deemed him a black nationalist, and unable to prove that black leadership could thwart black unrest, Stokes finished his four years in office with many of his legislative goals unfulfilled. Focusing on Stokes and Cleveland, but attending to themes that affected many urban centers after the second great migration of African Americans to the North, Moore balances Stokes' failures and successes to provide a thorough and engaging portrait of his life and his pioneering contributions to a distinct African American political culture that continues to shape American life. Following their consciences in defiance of their government, some 2,800 young Americans between 1936 and 1938 joined the cause of Spanish democracy under the banner of the Abraham Lincoln Brigade. "Passing the Torch" is an outspoken tribute to the heroism of the American volunteers of the 1930s and to their tradition of hope and resistance, which continues to inspire social activists to this day. A photoessay that captures the spirit of radicalism embodied in the brigadistas, this richly illustrated volume portrays Central American solidarity work in the 1980s, massive protests against the Gulf War in 1991, and the World Trade Organization 'Battle in Seattle' in December 1999. It also profiles seven Seattle-area veterans, representative of the 120 surviving members of the Lincoln Brigade, and documents the dedication ceremony of the first public monument to the Brigade in the United States. All text is presented in Spanish and English.
评分
评分
评分
评分
这本书的语言风格,说实话,在某些章节显得有些过于晦涩和学术化了。我不得不承认,在阅读关于城市规划和法律框架转变的那几章时,我好几次停下来查阅背景资料,不然实在难以跟上作者的论证思路。它似乎更倾向于服务于对专业领域有深入了解的读者,而不是大众读者。大量使用了非常精确的专业术语,并且在没有充分引入背景的情况下就直接深入到复杂的制度分析中。比如,对于特定时期内市政委员会投票机制的细致剖析,虽然在严谨性上无可挑剔,但对于非专业人士来说,就像是走进了一间塞满了晦涩图表的实验室,需要极大的专注力才能解码其中的含义。我欣赏作者对细节的痴迷和对史料的尊重,这种近乎偏执的求真态度是毋庸置疑的。但是,这种风格也带来了一个副作用,那就是叙事的流畅性受到了显著影响。当作者沉浸在对某个法案条款的逐字推敲时,人物的情感和故事的张力仿佛被暂时搁置了一旁,让期待情节推进的读者感到一丝疲惫。总而言之,这是一本需要“啃”下去的书,它提供的知识密度极高,但阅读体验的平滑度却因其过于专业化的语言倾向而打了折扣,更像是一部研究报告而非轻松的传记读物。
评分从结构上看,这本书的后半部分似乎在叙事上出现了一些节奏上的不均匀,这让我的阅读体验略有瑕疵。前半部分对于早年经历和初入政界的挣扎描绘得细腻入微,步步为营,让人对角色的成长路径有着清晰的预期。然而,当故事推进到后期,尤其是在处理到那些规模更为宏大、涉及范围更广的社会改革议题时,叙述的密度突然加快了。许多原本可以深入探讨的关键转折点,似乎被一笔带过,或者只是蜻蜓点水地提了一句结果,而缺乏对决策背后复杂谈判过程的充分展现。例如,关于某个关键立法成功通过的章节,我期待看到更多关于各方势力拉锯的细节,但呈现给我的却是相对简化的“成功”宣告。这使得后期的冲突解决显得有些过于顺利和仓促,削弱了角色在面对巨大阻力时应有的那种史诗般的张力。就好比一部精彩的交响乐,在宏伟的尾声部分,各个声部的力量没有得到充分的释放,而是提前收束了。这不能说作者没有能力处理这些复杂的事件,但可能是在篇幅或侧重点的权衡上,使得后期的阅读快感不如前期那般饱满和层层递进。
评分引人注目的是,本书对于“权力场域”的描绘展现了惊人的洞察力。作者并没有将焦点仅仅局限于主角的个人奋斗史,而是将他放置在一个巨大的、不断变动的社会网络之中进行考察。这种宏观与微观交织的视角,使得人物的行动不再是孤立的英雄主义展现,而是复杂博弈的结果。书中对派系斗争的刻画尤为精彩,那些看似不经意的午餐会、后台的秘密交易、以及报纸上模棱两可的评论,都被作者敏锐地捕捉并还原了其背后的真实意图。你能够清晰地看到,在光鲜亮丽的公共舞台之下,有多少看不见的推手在操控着局势的走向。特别是当描述到关键性的选举或政策推行过程中,作者对“非正式权力”的揭示,极具穿透力。例如,书中有一段描述了某个社区领袖如何通过协调地方教堂和工会的资源,有效地架空了既定的官方流程,这种对民间社会力量如何渗透并影响到上层建筑的描绘,显得尤为真实可信。它让读者深刻体会到,在现实的政治运作中,真正的力量往往潜藏于那些最不易被记录和量化的日常互动之中,而非仅仅是法条和演讲稿所能体现的。这种对权力运作肌理的深刻剖析,是本书最宝贵的财富之一。
评分这本书的旁征博引和大量的注释,构筑了一个极其坚实的学术基础,但同时也对普通读者的亲近性设置了一道无形的门槛。我欣赏作者在每一处关键论断后都附带的详尽的原始资料引用,这无疑是对其研究可靠性的有力背书。但这种详尽,有时会让人感到一种“过度的严谨”。在阅读过程中,我的注意力频繁地被拉出主线文本,去翻阅尾部的附注,试图理解某个特定日期或某句话出处的背景。虽然这对于严谨的研究者是至关重要的,但对于希望沉浸在故事中的读者来说,这种频繁的中断实在令人感到不便。它让阅读的“心流”状态难以维持。我感觉作者似乎更注重向同行证明其研究的深度和广度,而不是精心设计一条让所有读者都能舒适漫步的阅读路径。如果说这本书是一座信息量巨大的图书馆,那么它提供的导览图似乎是为图书馆管理员准备的,而不是为初次到访的游客设计的。我希望作者在未来能找到一种更优雅的方式,将这些宝贵的背景信息,以一种不打断主要叙事的方式融入文本之中,让知识的获取变得更为自然和愉悦。
评分这本书的叙事手法实在令人耳目一新,作者似乎对叙事节奏有着一种近乎本能的把握。它不像许多传记那样,线性地铺陈人物的生平轨迹,而是采取了一种碎片化、多角度的切入方式。初读时,你会感到一种轻微的迷失感,仿佛置身于一个巨大的、尚未拼凑完成的万花筒前。然而,正是这种看似无序的排列,最终在你的脑海中构建出了一个异常立体且复杂的形象。例如,书中对某个关键政治决策的描绘,并非直接陈述决策过程,而是通过引用多位当时在场人物的私下信件、会议间隙的只言片语,甚至是对环境声音的细致捕捉来侧面烘托当时的紧张氛围和人物内心的挣扎。这种“留白”的处理非常高明,它迫使读者不能被动接受信息,而是必须主动参与到意义的建构过程中去。特别是对人物内心冲突的刻画,作者避免了使用冗长的主观心理分析,而是巧妙地将心理状态外化到环境描写和人物的微小动作中。那种在巨大压力下,人物手指不自觉地敲击桌面的频率,或者是在公众场合下眼神中一闪而过的疲惫,都比任何直白的描述来得更有冲击力。这种高级的叙事技巧,使得这本书超越了一般的历史记录,更像是一部融合了心理学洞察的文学作品,让人在合上书本后仍能回味无穷,不断在脑海中重组那些闪烁的片段,试图捕捉人物性格最深层的真实面貌。
评分 评分 评分 评分 评分本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2026 book.wenda123.org All Rights Reserved. 图书目录大全 版权所有