In this provocative monograph, Bertram Malle describes behavior explanations as having a dual nature -- as being both cognitive and social acts -- and proposes a comprehensive theoretical model that integrates the two aspects. When people try to understand puzzling human behavior, they construct behavior explanations, which are a fundamental tool of social cognition. But, Malle argues, behavior explanations exist not only in the mind; they are also overt verbal actions used for social purposes. When people explain their own behavior or the behavior of others, they are using the explanation to manage a social interaction -- by offering clarification, trying to save face, or casting blame. Malle's account makes clear why these two aspects of behavior explanation exist and why they are closely linked; along the way, he illustrates the astonishingly sophisticated and subtle patterns of folk behavior explanations.Malle begins by reviewing traditional attribution theories and their simplified portrayal of behavior explanation. A more realistic portrayal, he argues, must be grounded in the nature, function, and origins of the folk theory of mind -- the conceptual framework underlying people's grasp of human behavior and its connection to the mind. Malle then presents a theory of behavior explanations, focusing first on their conceptual structure and then on their psychological construction. He applies this folk-conceptual theory to a number of questions, including the communicative functions of behavior explanations, and the differences in explanations given for self and others as well as for individuals and groups. Finally, he highlights the strengths of the folk-conceptual theory of explanation over traditional attribution theory and points to future research applications.
評分
評分
評分
評分
瀏覽瞭遍。有些可供商榷的地方:1. Desire reason 跟 purpose reason 都歸為 desire reason,可能不太好。2. Causal-history reason 的用法顯得任意而寬泛。3. “他為什麼突然走掉瞭?”“因為他太生氣瞭。”,以及“他為什麼要橫穿馬路?”“因為他不知道這樣很危險。”這樣的解釋,又該放到哪裏呢?
评分瀏覽瞭遍。有些可供商榷的地方:1. Desire reason 跟 purpose reason 都歸為 desire reason,可能不太好。2. Causal-history reason 的用法顯得任意而寬泛。3. “他為什麼突然走掉瞭?”“因為他太生氣瞭。”,以及“他為什麼要橫穿馬路?”“因為他不知道這樣很危險。”這樣的解釋,又該放到哪裏呢?
评分瀏覽瞭遍。有些可供商榷的地方:1. Desire reason 跟 purpose reason 都歸為 desire reason,可能不太好。2. Causal-history reason 的用法顯得任意而寬泛。3. “他為什麼突然走掉瞭?”“因為他太生氣瞭。”,以及“他為什麼要橫穿馬路?”“因為他不知道這樣很危險。”這樣的解釋,又該放到哪裏呢?
评分瀏覽瞭遍。有些可供商榷的地方:1. Desire reason 跟 purpose reason 都歸為 desire reason,可能不太好。2. Causal-history reason 的用法顯得任意而寬泛。3. “他為什麼突然走掉瞭?”“因為他太生氣瞭。”,以及“他為什麼要橫穿馬路?”“因為他不知道這樣很危險。”這樣的解釋,又該放到哪裏呢?
评分瀏覽瞭遍。有些可供商榷的地方:1. Desire reason 跟 purpose reason 都歸為 desire reason,可能不太好。2. Causal-history reason 的用法顯得任意而寬泛。3. “他為什麼突然走掉瞭?”“因為他太生氣瞭。”,以及“他為什麼要橫穿馬路?”“因為他不知道這樣很危險。”這樣的解釋,又該放到哪裏呢?
本站所有內容均為互聯網搜索引擎提供的公開搜索信息,本站不存儲任何數據與內容,任何內容與數據均與本站無關,如有需要請聯繫相關搜索引擎包括但不限於百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 qciss.net All Rights Reserved. 小哈圖書下載中心 版权所有