This provocative volume deals with one of the chief criticisms of ethnographic studies, a criticism which centres on their particularism or their insistence on context -- the question is asked: How can these studies be generalized beyond the individual case? Noblit and Hare propose a method -- meta-ethnography -- for synthesizing from qualitative, interpretive studies. They show that ethnographies themselves are interpretive acts, and demonstrate that by translating metaphors and key concepts between ethnographic studies, it is possible to develop a broader interpretive synthesis. Using examples from numerous studies, the authors illuminate how meta-ethnography works, isolate several types of meta-ethnographic study and provide a theoretical justification for the method's use.
具體描述
讀後感
評分
評分
評分
評分
用戶評價
定性研究閤成的開山之作吧，介紹瞭reciprocal, refutational, and line-of-argument三種研究結果的synthesis
评分定性研究閤成的開山之作吧，介紹瞭reciprocal, refutational, and line-of-argument三種研究結果的synthesis
评分定性研究閤成的開山之作吧，介紹瞭reciprocal, refutational, and line-of-argument三種研究結果的synthesis
评分定性研究閤成的開山之作吧，介紹瞭reciprocal, refutational, and line-of-argument三種研究結果的synthesis
评分定性研究閤成的開山之作吧，介紹瞭reciprocal, refutational, and line-of-argument三種研究結果的synthesis
相關圖書
本站所有內容均為互聯網搜索引擎提供的公開搜索信息，本站不存儲任何數據與內容，任何內容與數據均與本站無關，如有需要請聯繫相關搜索引擎包括但不限於百度，google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 qciss.net All Rights Reserved. 小哈圖書下載中心 版权所有