The use of theory' in feminist analysis has been said to threaten feminism as a political force. This collection of work by leading feminist scholars engages with the question of the political status of poststructuralist theory within feminism. Against the view that poststructuralism necessarily weakens feminism, Feminists Theorize the Political affirms the contemporary debate over theory as politically rich and consequential. The essays in Feminists Theorize the Political speak to the questions that emerge from the convergence of feminism and poststructuralism: What happens to feminist critique when traditional grounds and foundations - experience, history, universal norms - are called into question? Can feminist theory problematize the notion of the subject without losing its political effectivity? Which version of the subject is to be questioned, and how does that questioning open up possibilities for reformulating agency, power, and sites of political resistance? What are the consequences of a specifically feminist reformulation of difference? What are the uses and limits of a poststructuralist critique of binary logic for the theorization of racial and class differences, the position of the subaltern?
具體描述
讀後感
評分
評分
評分
評分
用戶評價
大部分內容跟我沒什麼關係
评分Schultz那篇，主要講性彆化勞動分工、主體認同和法律的關係。是法律塑造瞭主體並以此維係自身的正當性，而不是主體依靠法律來保護自身的“權益”。在工作機會中性彆平等 的相關司法判決中，常常齣現“女性自己不願意做男性工作，而不是社會性彆歧視”的論點，這種institutionalized的安排進一步塑造和改變瞭女性的性彆化勞動選擇和自我認同，以此為例，解釋法庭如何塑造齣“女性”這個集體身份。
评分Schultz那篇，主要講性彆化勞動分工、主體認同和法律的關係。是法律塑造瞭主體並以此維係自身的正當性，而不是主體依靠法律來保護自身的“權益”。在工作機會中性彆平等 的相關司法判決中，常常齣現“女性自己不願意做男性工作，而不是社會性彆歧視”的論點，這種institutionalized的安排進一步塑造和改變瞭女性的性彆化勞動選擇和自我認同，以此為例，解釋法庭如何塑造齣“女性”這個集體身份。
评分大部分內容跟我沒什麼關係
评分Schultz那篇，主要講性彆化勞動分工、主體認同和法律的關係。是法律塑造瞭主體並以此維係自身的正當性，而不是主體依靠法律來保護自身的“權益”。在工作機會中性彆平等 的相關司法判決中，常常齣現“女性自己不願意做男性工作，而不是社會性彆歧視”的論點，這種institutionalized的安排進一步塑造和改變瞭女性的性彆化勞動選擇和自我認同，以此為例，解釋法庭如何塑造齣“女性”這個集體身份。
相關圖書
本站所有內容均為互聯網搜索引擎提供的公開搜索信息，本站不存儲任何數據與內容，任何內容與數據均與本站無關，如有需要請聯繫相關搜索引擎包括但不限於百度，google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 qciss.net All Rights Reserved. 小哈圖書下載中心 版权所有