Susan Gal is Professor of Anthropology at the University of Chicago, and has written widely on questions of language, politics, and gender in East Central Europe.
Gail Kligman is Professor of Sociology at the University of California, Los Angeles, and has written widely on culture, politics, and gender in East Central Europe. Gal and Kligman are coeditors of Reproducing Gender: Politics, Publics, and Everyday Life after Socialism.
With the collapse of communism, a new world seemed to open for the people of East Central Europe. The possibilities this world presented, and the costs it exacted, have been experienced differently by men and women. Susan Gal and Gail Kligman explore these differences through a probing analysis of the role of gender in reshaping politics and social relations since 1989. The authors raise two crucial questions: How are gender relations and ideas about gender shaping political and economic change in the region? And what forms of gender inequality are emerging as a result? The book provides a rich understanding of gender relations and their significance in social and institutional transformations. Gal and Kligman offer a systematic comparison of East Central European gender relations with those of western welfare states, and with the presocialist, bourgeois past. Throughout this essay, the authors attend to historical comparisons as well as cross regional interactions and contrasts. Their work contributes importantly to the study of postsocialism, and to the broader feminist literature that critically examines how states and political-economic processes are gendered, and how states and markets regulate gender relations.
評分
評分
評分
評分
Central/East Europe
评分Central/East Europe
评分不僅是國傢和市場關係如何regulate性彆秩序,反過來,性彆關係也型塑瞭政治和經濟的轉變。另外public和private的討論很有趣,作為一種可在不同層麵呈現的fractal,且互相嵌入,二者的界定和互相關係又受到政治經濟轉型的影響。不知道有沒有專門講中國的類似研究,感覺從性彆視角來重新看五四和延安會很有趣,80年代至今還是離得太近,聯想到很多但很難把握。
评分不僅是國傢和市場關係如何regulate性彆秩序,反過來,性彆關係也型塑瞭政治和經濟的轉變。另外public和private的討論很有趣,作為一種可在不同層麵呈現的fractal,且互相嵌入,二者的界定和互相關係又受到政治經濟轉型的影響。不知道有沒有專門講中國的類似研究,感覺從性彆視角來重新看五四和延安會很有趣,80年代至今還是離得太近,聯想到很多但很難把握。
评分不僅是國傢和市場關係如何regulate性彆秩序,反過來,性彆關係也型塑瞭政治和經濟的轉變。另外public和private的討論很有趣,作為一種可在不同層麵呈現的fractal,且互相嵌入,二者的界定和互相關係又受到政治經濟轉型的影響。不知道有沒有專門講中國的類似研究,感覺從性彆視角來重新看五四和延安會很有趣,80年代至今還是離得太近,聯想到很多但很難把握。
本站所有內容均為互聯網搜索引擎提供的公開搜索信息,本站不存儲任何數據與內容,任何內容與數據均與本站無關,如有需要請聯繫相關搜索引擎包括但不限於百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 qciss.net All Rights Reserved. 小哈圖書下載中心 版权所有