Science, Technology & Society in Seventeenth-Century England 在線電子書 圖書標籤: 曆史  科學史  十七世紀  世界史  socialist  STS  Robert_Merton   

喜歡 Science, Technology & Society in Seventeenth-Century England 在線電子書 的讀者還喜歡

The Merton Thesis: the role of Puritanism and the "foci of interest"in the making of science.For now, I have no interest in the first part, which resembles Weber's Protestant ethics in the making of capitalism. I am more interested in elaborating social and economic conditions affecting scientific activities.

The Merton Thesis: the role of Puritanism and the "foci of interest"in the making of science.For now, I have no interest in the first part, which resembles Weber's Protestant ethics in the making of capitalism. I am more interested in elaborating social and economic conditions affecting scientific activities.

The Merton Thesis: the role of Puritanism and the "foci of interest"in the making of science.For now, I have no interest in the first part, which resembles Weber's Protestant ethics in the making of capitalism. I am more interested in elaborating social and economic conditions affecting scientific activities.

The Merton Thesis: the role of Puritanism and the "foci of interest"in the making of science.For now, I have no interest in the first part, which resembles Weber's Protestant ethics in the making of capitalism. I am more interested in elaborating social and economic conditions affecting scientific activities.

The Merton Thesis: the role of Puritanism and the "foci of interest"in the making of science.For now, I have no interest in the first part, which resembles Weber's Protestant ethics in the making of capitalism. I am more interested in elaborating social and economic conditions affecting scientific activities.

十七世纪英格兰的科学、技术与社会》 　　 　　著者：[美] 罗伯特·金·默顿 　　译者：范岱年等 　　出版者：商务印书馆2002年4月第2版 　　 　　美国科学史家罗伯特·金·默顿著。记得去年12月我在工人体育场冬季书市凛冽的寒风中看到这本书的时候，正对近代航海技术和军事技...  

摘要 在现代社会的语境中，科学与宗教往往被置于相互对立的两极，但事实果真如此吗？莫顿在其博士论文《十七世纪英格兰的科学、技术与社会》中基于历史材料对新教伦理与科学发展的关系作了深入的论述。本文拟选取该论文第四章《清教主义与文化价值》一节进行讨论，试图勾勒科学...  

摘录一段书评： 全文在此： http://cfyang2005.blog.163.com/blog/static/491040632010614112834929/ 外史论的观点既给科技史的研究开辟了一条新的道路，但它也存在着自己的缺陷。如1959年，科学史家吉里斯皮(C.C.Gillispie)对因默顿等人工作而影响渐强的外史研究，表达了他...  

记得以前看过一篇文章，里面写的是大文豪列夫·托尔斯泰的读书方式 ，每当他拿起一本文学书，总是先认真的看看书名，然后默默的想如果是自己拿到这个题目的话，该如何写作，假如该书的构架、内容之类的和自己的一样，那么他就不用再看这本书了，只有当这本书里面的内容和自...  

“什么是科学？”“什么是技术？”“科学在我们的社会中该摆在哪个位置？”······带着许许多多的疑问拿起了这本《十七世纪英格兰的科学、技术与社会》。没能说看完之后立马对“科学”“技术”“社会”以及它们的关系有了很清晰的理解，但至少有了点入门的感觉。这，是我...