Science, Technology & Society in Seventeenth-Century England 在线电子书 图书标签: 历史  科学史  十七世纪  世界史  socialist  STS  Robert_Merton   

喜欢 Science, Technology & Society in Seventeenth-Century England 在线电子书 的读者还喜欢

The Merton Thesis: the role of Puritanism and the "foci of interest"in the making of science.For now, I have no interest in the first part, which resembles Weber's Protestant ethics in the making of capitalism. I am more interested in elaborating social and economic conditions affecting scientific activities.

The Merton Thesis: the role of Puritanism and the "foci of interest"in the making of science.For now, I have no interest in the first part, which resembles Weber's Protestant ethics in the making of capitalism. I am more interested in elaborating social and economic conditions affecting scientific activities.

The Merton Thesis: the role of Puritanism and the "foci of interest"in the making of science.For now, I have no interest in the first part, which resembles Weber's Protestant ethics in the making of capitalism. I am more interested in elaborating social and economic conditions affecting scientific activities.

The Merton Thesis: the role of Puritanism and the "foci of interest"in the making of science.For now, I have no interest in the first part, which resembles Weber's Protestant ethics in the making of capitalism. I am more interested in elaborating social and economic conditions affecting scientific activities.

The Merton Thesis: the role of Puritanism and the "foci of interest"in the making of science.For now, I have no interest in the first part, which resembles Weber's Protestant ethics in the making of capitalism. I am more interested in elaborating social and economic conditions affecting scientific activities.

摘要 在现代社会的语境中，科学与宗教往往被置于相互对立的两极，但事实果真如此吗？莫顿在其博士论文《十七世纪英格兰的科学、技术与社会》中基于历史材料对新教伦理与科学发展的关系作了深入的论述。本文拟选取该论文第四章《清教主义与文化价值》一节进行讨论，试图勾勒科学...  

作者的勇气在于敢于花很多时间去论证一个很简单的观点——即社会因素影响科学和技术的发展。 但是这个观点在今天看了过于显而易见了。

看起来那叫一个没味道啊，不过公选课作业要求看它才硬着头皮去看。书内容不多，附注倒是很多，但是这不多的内容看起来还是很慢看完了都不知道在说什么，总体感觉就是用整本书去论证一个观点，清教主义对科学很重要。。。  

默顿被尊为科学社会学之父，其学识和功力从这本书可见一斑。然而， 基督徒们对该书的误解、曲解、谣传简直罄竹难书。 1、默顿在1970年写的再版前言中反复声明，很多人曲解了该书。其实该书并非要证明基督教信仰是促进英国现代科学发展的“最”重要原因！ 2、该书的观点：促进...