具体描述
Over the past year, a startling development has occurred in the mainstream press: sportswriters have started taking note of women who participate in violent sports. Such women include Tonya Butler, who wants to be the first woman to play in a Division I football game; Laila Ali, a professional boxer with a winning record, who wants to follow in her father's footsteps; and Margaret McGregor, the first woman to fight a man in a professional boxing bout (she won). But there have always been women who participated in contact sports. Think of the women's hockey team who competed in the 1998 Olympics they've been playing the game for years. Or consider the Golden Gloves Boxing Championships, which allowed female competitors since 1995. Or consider the case of Susan Booth, nobody famous, a gym owner, mother of two and fifth-degree (master) black belt in Tae Kwon Do. She's been fighting for fifteen years. That women have participated in violent sports for some years doesn't mean women in contact sports is accepted or considered acceptable by most people. The Title IX regulation, which is supposed to guarantee equal opportunity for female college athletes, specifically excludes contact sports from its gender equity statement women who wished to participate in contact sports at a college and are not allowed to do so can have claim against the school; legally they are not being discriminated against. Sportswriter Leigh Montville has attacked women's boxing as "a sick athletic cartoon." He claims that women participating in contact sports are being exploited. But the women involved don't seem to think so. "This is a dream of mine," says Freeda Foreman (daughter of George Foreman). "I want to let women know there are no limitations." Laila Ali says, "I just love how it feels." As female participation in violent sports such as boxing, hockey and martial arts grows, so do the questions. It can no longer be called a 'novelty' or a 'gimmick' as it has been in the past. So, why do women participate in violent sports and what does it mean? Including the author's personal experience as an athlete and the experiences and thoughts of other women in violent sports, some well-known, some not, all of them defying traditional gender roles. Through interviews and questionnaires with athletes, coaches and observers as well as trained mental health professionals interested in the phenomenon, the reasons why women participate in contact sports and what they get out of them are examined.
作者简介
目录信息
读后感
用户评价
这本书真是让人眼前一亮，作者的叙事功力深厚得惊人。开篇的场景构建就如同电影镜头般立体，文字的颗粒感和光影变化清晰可见，我仿佛身临其境地走进了那个充满未知与张力的世界。情节的推进并不急躁，而是像一位技艺精湛的织布匠，缓缓展开一张结构复杂但丝丝入扣的网。人物的塑造尤其出色，每一个角色都带着鲜明的“缺陷美”，他们的动机和挣扎被挖掘得极其彻底，让人在阅读过程中不断地思考“如果是我，我会怎么做？”。尤其欣赏作者在处理道德灰色地带时的那种游刃有余，没有简单地贴上“好”或“坏”的标签，而是让读者自己去掂量每一个选择背后的重量。那种沉甸甸的感觉，读完后依然久久不散。这本书的语言风格是内敛而精准的，绝不堆砌华丽辞藻，但每一个词语都像是精确计算过一样，恰到好处地推动着情绪的累积，最终在某个意想不到的转折点上爆发出来，那种酣畅淋漓的阅读体验，很久没有感受到了。这本书的结构布局也十分巧妙，几条看似平行的故事线，在不经意间交汇融合，最后形成一个震撼人心的整体。
评分这部作品最打动我的地方，在于它对“失落”和“追寻”主题的深刻描摹，它捕捉到了现代人在面对巨大变迁时那种普遍的无根感。作者的文风带着一种近乎诗意的忧郁，遣词造句看似简单，却有一种直击人心深处的穿透力。他似乎对“失去”这件事有着深刻的理解，不是那种歇斯底里的悲伤，而是一种历经沧桑后的平静接受，这种情绪的渲染非常高级。故事线索并非沿着传统的主角升级打怪的路径发展，而更像是一场漫长的自我放逐与回归的旅程，每一个遇到的角色、经历的事件，都像是为了映照主角内心深处那份尚未愈合的创伤。我在阅读过程中，时常会因为某个细腻的情感捕捉而感到喉咙发紧，这是一种非常纯粹的、文学性的共鸣。这本书的收尾处理得极其克制和高明，它没有给出一个完美的结局，而是将最终的选择权留给了角色和读者，那份留白，比任何详尽的描述都更有力量，让人久久回味其中蕴含的希望与无奈的交织。
评分我最近读过的文学作品中，这本书的“世界观构建”无疑是最具创新性和沉浸感的。它描绘的那个社会环境，细致入微到令人发指，从空气中弥漫的气味，到社会阶层间微妙的权力符号，再到那些独特的俚语和不成文的规矩，都构建得无比真实和可信。这种扎实的细节铺陈，让整个故事的基底稳固无比，即便情节发展到最超现实或最极端的时刻，读者也不会产生“出戏”的感觉，因为那个世界已经活生生地存在于我们脑海中。作者对于环境和角色命运之间相互作用的探讨，也十分到位，环境不再是简单的背景板，而是成为了推动情节发展、甚至塑造人物性格的强大外力。阅读体验很像是在一个复杂的密室中探索，每解开一个小谜题，都会为你揭示出更宏大、更令人不安的真相。这本书的叙事视角转换得非常自然流畅，一会儿是局内人的焦灼，一会儿又是上帝视角的冷静审视，这种多角度的切换，极大地丰富了故事的层次感，让人不断地跳出自我，以更广阔的视野去理解故事的全貌。
评分老实说，这本书的阅读门槛不低，它要求读者投入极大的专注力，但一旦你跨过了最初的“适应期”，你就会发现自己被吸入了一个极其迷人的智力迷宫。这本书的“节奏”非常具有欺骗性，它表面上看起来波澜不惊，像是在进行一场沉闷的对话，但实际上，暗流汹涌，每一次看似不经意的对话中都可能隐藏着关键的线索或者致命的陷阱。作者对“悬念”的处理堪称一绝，他深谙如何用信息的不对称来调动读者的好奇心，而不是依赖那些老套的、公式化的情节反转。我尤其欣赏作者在对话描写上的功力，那些台词写得极其精炼，充满了潜台词和未尽之意，你需要仔细体会字里行间隐藏的那些试探、伪装和最终的摊牌。这本书更像是一场高智商的心理博弈，它考验的不仅是书中人物的智慧，更是读者自身的联想和推理能力。读完后，我感觉自己的思维敏捷度都被提升了好几个档次，确实是一部值得反复品味的硬核之作。
评分这本书的哲学思辨性简直是教科书级别的范本，它绝非那种提供标准答案的通俗读物，而更像是一场邀请你参与其中的深度对话。作者似乎对人性的底层逻辑有着异乎寻常的洞察力，他并不直接灌输观点，而是通过一系列极端的情境考验，逼迫角色乃至读者去直面那些我们日常生活中习惯性回避的终极问题：自由的边界在哪里？牺牲的价值如何衡量？记忆和身份之间真正的关联又是什么？我特别喜欢作者处理时间线的方式，那种非线性的叙事结构，像一把手术刀，精准地切开了因果链，让我们得以从不同的时间维度审视事件的来龙去脉。阅读过程中，我不得不频繁地停下来，反复阅读某些段落，不仅仅是为了理解情节，更是为了消化其中蕴含的深层含义。这本书的节奏感非常独特，时而如慢板的咏叹调般细腻铺陈，时而又像激昂的鼓点般骤然加速，这种张弛有度的掌控力，显示出作者极高的文学素养和对读者的尊重，他给予了我们思考的空间，而不是强行塞入结论。
评分 评分 评分 评分 评分
