The principal findings of experimental economics are that impersonal exchange in markets converges in repeated interaction to the equilibrium states implied by economic theory, under information conditions far weaker than specified in the theory. In personal, social, and economic exchange, as studied in two-person games, cooperation exceeds the prediction of traditional game theory. This book relates these two findings to field studies and applications and integrates them with the main themes of the Scottish Enlightenment and with the thoughts of F. A. Hayek.
Summary: Unique insights plus an enjoyable read
Rating: 5
I read a lot of books about economics. Until reading Rationality in Economics, I had not read an economics book that gave me precisely what I want: (1) genuine insights on a wide range of important issues, (2) a feel for the key contributions in the academic literature with a minimum of technical detail, and (3) a writing style that explains so much in straightforward language that reading the book becomes a uniquely enjoyable learning experience. So, if you want to share that experience, read Rationality in Economics by the Nobel prize winning economist Vernon Smith. A major theme is the interplay between constructivist rationality (logical thinking) and ecological rationality (selection over time of what works best that results in our cultural and biological heritage). Gaining an appreciation for these two types of rationality illuminates the work of Adam Smith and Friedrich Hayek and also provides a healthy skepticism of "fix the economy" proposals from Washington. Wealth creation through specialization, innovation, and trade that meet existing needs and create new needs is facilitated by markets. Important to understand how markets work, right? Vernon's Nobel prize was awarded for his pioneering contribution to experimental economics that uses laboratory experiments to test hypotheses about how markets function --- the behavior of participants and the institutional rules of the game. This book is a beautiful summary of experimental economics. Along the way, we learn about smart ways to deregulate markets guided by laboratory experiments (what California politicians failed to do when they deregulated a portion of that state's electricity market). We learn how to think about market efficiency and the apparent conflicting view of behavioral anomalies. We learn about how decision making relates to the way in which our brains have evolved (neuroeconomics). Perhaps you have felt uneasy about the widely-touted superiority of Bayesian decision making and related handling of probabilites. The Psychology and Markets chapter contains an elegant explanation of why you should be critical (hint: surprises are important). The Rationality in Science chapter addresses the age-old dilemma of how we know what we think we know. Vernon's answer is an absolute treasure that everyone should read and ponder. These brief highlights give some indication of why Rationality in Economics is the most useful economics book that I have read.
Vernon L. Smith, Nobel Prize winner in Economics, 2002, is currently Professor of Economics and Law at George Mason University, a research scholar in the Interdisciplinary Center for Economic Science, and a Fellow of the Mercatus Center all in Arlington, VA. He received his bachelor's degree in Electrical Engineering from Cal Tech, and his Ph.D. in Economics from Harvard. He has authored or co-authored over 200 articles and books on capital theory, finance, natural resource economics and experimental economics.
He serves or has served on the board of editors of the American Economic Review, The Cato Journal, Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, the Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, Science, Economic Theory, Economic Design, Games and Economic Behavior, and the Journal of Economic Methodology.
He is past president of the Public Choice Society, the Economic Science Association, the Western Economic Association and the Association for Private Enterprise Education. Previous faculty appointments include the University of Arizona, Purdue, Brown University and the University of Massachusetts. He has been a Ford Foundation Fellow, Fellow of the Center for Advanced Study in the Behavioral Sciences and a Sherman Fairchild Distinguished Scholar at the California Institute of Technology.
The Cambridge University Press published his Papers in Experimental Economics in 1991, and they published a second collection of more recent papers, Bargaining and Market Behavior, in 2000. He received an honorary Doctor of Management degree from Purdue University, and is a Fellow of the Econometric Society, the American Association for the Advancement of Science, and the American Academy of Arts and Sciences.
He is a distinguished fellow of the American Economic Association, an Andersen Consulting Professor of the Year, the 1995 Adam Smith award recipient conferred by the Association for Private Enterprise Education. He was elected a member of the National Academy of Sciences in 1995, and received CalTech's distinguished alumni award in 1996. He has served as a consultant on the privatization of electric power in Australia and New Zealand and participated in numerous private and public discussions of energy deregulation in the United States. In 1997 he served as a Blue Ribbon Panel Member, National Electric Reliability Council.
哈耶克为广大观众所熟知,是因为他的那本通俗读物《通向奴役之路》。严格说起来,那并不能算一本经济学读物,但是恰恰是它吸引了很多读者对经济学产生兴趣,尤其是没有经过经济学专业训练的。 很多人对于哈耶克的理解,应该是它认为匿名的市场交易,可以通过价格机制(invi...
评分哈耶克为广大观众所熟知,是因为他的那本通俗读物《通向奴役之路》。严格说起来,那并不能算一本经济学读物,但是恰恰是它吸引了很多读者对经济学产生兴趣,尤其是没有经过经济学专业训练的。 很多人对于哈耶克的理解,应该是它认为匿名的市场交易,可以通过价格机制(invi...
评分如题,经济学的数学模型推理得再严谨严密。如果经不起现实的检验,那只能沦为黑板上的经济学,甚至是脱离实际的数学游戏,甚至是伪科学。概率论上有误差分析,同理,基于若干假设之上进行的经济学数学模型推理也要写明误差分析,即对数学模型脱离现实的程度进行定量分析,才可...
评分哈耶克为广大观众所熟知,是因为他的那本通俗读物《通向奴役之路》。严格说起来,那并不能算一本经济学读物,但是恰恰是它吸引了很多读者对经济学产生兴趣,尤其是没有经过经济学专业训练的。 很多人对于哈耶克的理解,应该是它认为匿名的市场交易,可以通过价格机制(invi...
评分哈耶克为广大观众所熟知,是因为他的那本通俗读物《通向奴役之路》。严格说起来,那并不能算一本经济学读物,但是恰恰是它吸引了很多读者对经济学产生兴趣,尤其是没有经过经济学专业训练的。 很多人对于哈耶克的理解,应该是它认为匿名的市场交易,可以通过价格机制(invi...
这本经济学著作的视角之新颖,简直让人耳目一新。它并没有过多纠缠于那些教科书式的宏大叙事,而是巧妙地将目光聚焦于个体决策的微观层面,尤其是那些在看似非理性的表象下,实际隐藏着的深层逻辑。作者以一种近乎人类学家的细致入微,剖析了人们在面对不确定性时的心理机制,以及这些机制如何形塑了我们日常的经济行为。阅读过程中,我时常会停下来深思,那些我过去习以为常的“直觉判断”,背后竟有着如此复杂的认知偏差作为支撑。书中对行为经济学的引用恰到好处,既没有让内容变得晦涩难懂,又为论证提供了坚实的实证基础。尤其欣赏的是,作者没有将“理性”简单地等同于“最优解”,而是将其视为一种动态的、受环境制约的适应过程。这种对人类局限性的深刻理解,使得整本书读起来充满了人情味,远非那些冷冰冰的模型可以比拟。它成功地搭建了一座桥梁,连接了规范经济学和经验观察,让读者在理解市场运作的同时,也更深刻地认识了自己。
评分坦率地说,这本书的论证结构如同精密的瑞士钟表,每一个齿轮——每一个论点——都与前后紧密咬合,推动着核心思想向前发展,那种逻辑推演的严密性令人叹服。作者似乎对信息的组织有着近乎偏执的追求,每一章节的展开都遵循着一种清晰的、层层递进的节奏,避免了任何不必要的冗余和枝蔓。我尤其欣赏作者在处理复杂概念时所展现出的语言驾驭能力,那些原本可能需要多页篇幅解释的经济学悖论,被提炼成了几个精准有力的句子,清晰而有力。这不仅仅是一本经济学读物,更像是一场智力上的对话,它挑战着读者固有的认知框架,迫使我们去审视那些被我们不假思索接受的假设。全书的基调是审慎而深刻的,没有哗众取宠的论断,只有基于严谨分析得出的审慎结论。读完合上书本的那一刻,会有一种“原来如此”的豁然开朗感,这正是优秀学术著作的魅力所在。
评分这是一部需要静下心来细细品味的著作。它绝非那种可以囫囵吞枣、快速翻阅的畅销书,而是需要读者投入时间去消化和反刍的深度思考之作。书中引用的案例和数据往往跨越了不同的学科领域,从博弈论到心理学,再到演化生物学,显示出作者广阔的知识背景和跨学科的整合能力。尽管主题严肃,但作者的叙述风格却保持着一种令人意外的轻快和幽默感,特别是在描述某些经典的认知偏差时,总能用寥寥数语勾勒出人性的可爱与可笑之处。然而,这种轻松的笔触之下,是极其扎实的理论基础支撑。对于渴望深入理解当代经济学思潮演变的人来说,这本书提供了一个极佳的切入点,它清晰地勾勒出了经济学在面对“真实世界”挑战时所经历的范式转移。唯一的“挑战”在于,它会让你对许多传统经济学的假设产生根本性的质疑,你需要做好心理准备去面对这些被动打破的观念。
评分我很少读到一本能将理论深度与实践指导性结合得如此天衣无缝的经济学书籍。它没有停留在对“人类行为如何偏离理性”的纯粹批判上,而是更进一步,探讨了在这些既定的人类局限下,社会系统和市场结构应该如何设计才能更有效地运作。作者的叙事仿佛一位经验老到的工程师,在展示了建筑的现有缺陷后,立刻提出了基于现有材料的优化方案。特别是关于信息传递和群体决策部分的论述,其洞察力简直是惊人的。它迫使我重新审视了许多公共政策和商业策略的有效性,思考它们是否仅仅是基于对人类的理想化假设而构建的空中楼阁。语言上,作者的表达精确而富有张力,句子结构变化多端,避免了学术写作中常见的单调重复,读起来有一种行云流水的畅快感。总而言之,这本书不仅是知识的积累,更是一次思维方式的重塑过程。
评分这本书给我带来了极大的启发,它成功地将经济学分析从抽象的数学公式中解放出来,重新植根于现实世界的复杂性之中。作者似乎对人类行为的“非完美”抱持着一种近乎慈悲的理解,不再将所有偏离标准模型的行为都视为“错误”或“需要矫正”的瑕疵,而是将其视为在信息不完全和认知资源有限的约束下,个体为了生存和适应所演化出的“启发式”策略。这种视角极大地拓宽了我的思维边界。我发现自己开始在日常生活中不自觉地运用书中所提及的框架去分析周围发生的事情,从金融市场的非理性波动到日常购物中的价格锚定效应,一切都变得有了新的解释维度。文字的运用上,作者倾向于使用强烈的比喻和类比来阐释抽象的理论,使得即便是对经济学不太熟悉的读者也能迅速抓住要点,这种对可读性的重视,无疑是本书能够吸引广泛读者的关键因素。它不仅教授了知识,更培养了一种看待世界的新视角。
评分 评分 评分 评分 评分本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2026 book.wenda123.org All Rights Reserved. 图书目录大全 版权所有