How Judges Think 在线电子书 图书标签: 法律 法学 英文 经典 美国 制度
发表于2024-12-25
How Judges Think 在线电子书 pdf 下载 txt下载 epub 下载 mobi 下载 2024
A possible good book...
评分波斯纳的书都是一个套路:看起来是一大篇吐槽,细读还挺有道理,读完以后又感到有些无力。司法解释一向被认为是法院的制衡要器,焉知实用主义法官可能边解释边骂荒谬。但“实用”仅是一种指明方向的态度,连最聪明的法官也只能叹息一声,又翻起哲学书了。
评分波斯纳的书都是一个套路:看起来是一大篇吐槽,细读还挺有道理,读完以后又感到有些无力。司法解释一向被认为是法院的制衡要器,焉知实用主义法官可能边解释边骂荒谬。但“实用”仅是一种指明方向的态度,连最聪明的法官也只能叹息一声,又翻起哲学书了。
评分波斯纳的书都是一个套路:看起来是一大篇吐槽,细读还挺有道理,读完以后又感到有些无力。司法解释一向被认为是法院的制衡要器,焉知实用主义法官可能边解释边骂荒谬。但“实用”仅是一种指明方向的态度,连最聪明的法官也只能叹息一声,又翻起哲学书了。
评分波斯纳的书都是一个套路:看起来是一大篇吐槽,细读还挺有道理,读完以后又感到有些无力。司法解释一向被认为是法院的制衡要器,焉知实用主义法官可能边解释边骂荒谬。但“实用”仅是一种指明方向的态度,连最聪明的法官也只能叹息一声,又翻起哲学书了。
理查德.波斯纳,先后以最优生和年级第一名毕业于耶鲁大学英文系(1959)和哈佛大学法学院(1962)。曾任美国联邦最高法院大法官助理、联邦政府律师、斯坦福大学法学院副教授(1968)、芝加哥大学法学院教授(1969)和讲座教授。1981年出任美国联邦第七巡回区上诉法院法官至今(1993~2000年任首席法官),同时担任芝加哥大学法学院高级讲师。
A distinguished and experienced appellate court judge, Richard A. Posner offers in this new book a unique and, to orthodox legal thinkers, a startling perspective on how judges and justices decide cases. When conventional legal materials enable judges to ascertain the true facts of a case and apply clear pre-existing legal rules to them, Posner argues, they do so straightforwardly; that is the domain of legalist reasoning. However, in non-routine cases, the conventional materials run out and judges are on their own, navigating uncharted seas with equipment consisting of experience, emotions, and often unconscious beliefs. In doing so, they take on a legislative role, though one that is confined by internal and external constraints, such as professional ethics, opinions of respected colleagues, and limitations imposed by other branches of government on freewheeling judicial discretion.Occasional legislators, judges are motivated by political considerations in a broad and sometimes a narrow sense of that term. In that open area, most American judges are legal pragmatists. Legal pragmatism is forward-looking and policy-based. It focuses on the consequences of a decision in both the short and the long term, rather than on its antecedent logic. Legal pragmatism so understood is really just a form of ordinary practical reasoning, rather than some special kind of legal reasoning.Supreme Court justices are uniquely free from the constraints on ordinary judges and uniquely tempted to engage in legislative forms of adjudication. More than any other court, the Supreme Court is best understood as a political court.
一说起美国的法官,我们往往有一种先入为主的印象:专业,不讲政治,只讲法律。法律如何规定,法官便如何断案,他们不需要考虑除法条以外的其他因素。这时候,浮现在我们脑海里的是那句著名的法谚:风能进,雨能进,国王不能进。 美国的法院果真是与政治绝缘的么?我最近在读...
评分1、怎么理解“政治性”?模糊之中,总是容易武断地将政治与权力挂钩。似乎,所谓政治,不过是权力的斗争,不过是领导人相互扳手腕的另一种存在。或许借着人民的外套,但终归是戒律严明的你我不理解。 放到中国的司法现实来看,则意味着,法院是不是得时时刻刻地跟在政府后面俯...
评分一说起美国的法官,我们往往有一种先入为主的印象:专业,不讲政治,只讲法律。法律如何规定,法官便如何断案,他们不需要考虑除法条以外的其他因素。这时候,浮现在我们脑海里的是那句著名的法谚:风能进,雨能进,国王不能进。 美国的法院果真是与政治绝缘的么?我最近在读...
评分Scribes Journal of Legal Writing 1993 *45 "HOW I WRITE" ESSAYS Richard A. Posner [FNa1] Copyright ?1993 by Scribes; Richard A. Posner ...
How Judges Think 在线电子书 pdf 下载 txt下载 epub 下载 mobi 下载 2024