How Judges Think 在線電子書 圖書標籤: 法律 法學 英文 經典 美國 製度
發表於2024-12-24
How Judges Think 在線電子書 pdf 下載 txt下載 epub 下載 mobi 下載 2024
A possible good book...
評分A possible good book...
評分波斯納的書都是一個套路:看起來是一大篇吐槽,細讀還挺有道理,讀完以後又感到有些無力。司法解釋一嚮被認為是法院的製衡要器,焉知實用主義法官可能邊解釋邊罵荒謬。但“實用”僅是一種指明方嚮的態度,連最聰明的法官也隻能嘆息一聲,又翻起哲學書瞭。
評分A possible good book...
評分A possible good book...
理查德.波斯納,先後以最優生和年級第一名畢業於耶魯大學英文係(1959)和哈佛大學法學院(1962)。曾任美國聯邦最高法院大法官助理、聯邦政府律師、斯坦福大學法學院副教授(1968)、芝加哥大學法學院教授(1969)和講座教授。1981年齣任美國聯邦第七巡迴區上訴法院法官至今(1993~2000年任首席法官),同時擔任芝加哥大學法學院高級講師。
A distinguished and experienced appellate court judge, Richard A. Posner offers in this new book a unique and, to orthodox legal thinkers, a startling perspective on how judges and justices decide cases. When conventional legal materials enable judges to ascertain the true facts of a case and apply clear pre-existing legal rules to them, Posner argues, they do so straightforwardly; that is the domain of legalist reasoning. However, in non-routine cases, the conventional materials run out and judges are on their own, navigating uncharted seas with equipment consisting of experience, emotions, and often unconscious beliefs. In doing so, they take on a legislative role, though one that is confined by internal and external constraints, such as professional ethics, opinions of respected colleagues, and limitations imposed by other branches of government on freewheeling judicial discretion.Occasional legislators, judges are motivated by political considerations in a broad and sometimes a narrow sense of that term. In that open area, most American judges are legal pragmatists. Legal pragmatism is forward-looking and policy-based. It focuses on the consequences of a decision in both the short and the long term, rather than on its antecedent logic. Legal pragmatism so understood is really just a form of ordinary practical reasoning, rather than some special kind of legal reasoning.Supreme Court justices are uniquely free from the constraints on ordinary judges and uniquely tempted to engage in legislative forms of adjudication. More than any other court, the Supreme Court is best understood as a political court.
他的书总是很贵 这是买的第一本书,总体说来还是可以的,不会后悔。 要了解下美国联邦法院的法官和美国司法,看看还是可以的。 里面提到的那几个法官写的书,我还没看过,但是看起来波斯纳不太喜欢他们。苏力翻译成“邪说”,是不是邪说,还是要等自己看了才知道,目前时间不够...
評分说波斯纳写的书比别人看的书都多,我觉得主要原因在于他太啰嗦,仿佛一不小心就会出一本书。 整本书看下来,原谅我的愚钝,感受不到苏力老师说的那么“明快、犀利”,反倒是觉得苏力老师太一惊一乍了,发现波斯纳批驳“法条主义”而讲“法官的政治性”,好像与他心心相印一般...
評分说苏力老师在代译序里对法条主义的批评,完全没有建设性,完全是破坏性的,苏力老师也没啥特别主张,单纯就是为了批评批评“法条主义”罢了。所以大家千万不要认真!! 且说,作为规范学的法学,抛开“规范”,那还剩下什么??? 作为法治的后进国家,我们进步的基础就是“法...
評分他的书总是很贵 这是买的第一本书,总体说来还是可以的,不会后悔。 要了解下美国联邦法院的法官和美国司法,看看还是可以的。 里面提到的那几个法官写的书,我还没看过,但是看起来波斯纳不太喜欢他们。苏力翻译成“邪说”,是不是邪说,还是要等自己看了才知道,目前时间不够...
評分说苏力老师在代译序里对法条主义的批评,完全没有建设性,完全是破坏性的,苏力老师也没啥特别主张,单纯就是为了批评批评“法条主义”罢了。所以大家千万不要认真!! 且说,作为规范学的法学,抛开“规范”,那还剩下什么??? 作为法治的后进国家,我们进步的基础就是“法...
How Judges Think 在線電子書 pdf 下載 txt下載 epub 下載 mobi 下載 2024