OU Chaoquan, was a research student at the Central Institute of Nationalities in Beijing in the late 1950s and a researcher and ultimately full professor, associated with the Qinghai Institute of Nationalities, 1960-1995. His research interests include: anthropology generally, Tibetan studies and Kam culture.
Norman Geary, D. Phil. (1987) in Mathematical Statistics, University of Oxford, studied linguistics in 1991 and became a member of SIL International. He was associated with Guizhou University from 1995 to 2007. His research interests include: Dong language and culture, and bilingual education.
Although this unique insider's account of minority life in China is clearly a book in itself, it is also the sequel to the much-acclaimed The Kam People of China (Geary, Ou and others, 2003). It describes the hitherto scarcely researched culture of people from Xiangye village, in an untravelled corner of Guizhou province, Southwest China, in the 20 years leading up to Liberation in 1949. Xiangye is a Kam (Dong) nationality village, so the book highlights Kam culture of the 1930s and 1940s. It is a fascinating and unparalleled study, also offering exceptionally clear details of many aspects of material culture and social customs, for example, the work of rice-farming, cotton production, and cooking, beautifully illustrated with line drawings and photographs, that should appeal to anyone interested in the Kam people, China, or in ethnology generally.
The author grew up in Xiangye and later became Professor of Anthropology at a university in Qinghai province. The manuscript was first written in Chinese, with the intention of having it translated into English for an outside readership.
評分
評分
評分
評分
侗族本土學者對所在村寨的民族誌描寫。1930-40年代侗族傳統文化狀況。柳開村位於南北侗區之間,文化受兩方麵(本書認為南北侗區人種也有所差異)以及漢族文化影響,較為獨特。本書更多的是描述,但沒有闡釋。後記中關於侗族傳統在解放後的斷續令人惋惜。
评分侗族本土學者對所在村寨的民族誌描寫。1930-40年代侗族傳統文化狀況。柳開村位於南北侗區之間,文化受兩方麵(本書認為南北侗區人種也有所差異)以及漢族文化影響,較為獨特。本書更多的是描述,但沒有闡釋。後記中關於侗族傳統在解放後的斷續令人惋惜。
评分侗族本土學者對所在村寨的民族誌描寫。1930-40年代侗族傳統文化狀況。柳開村位於南北侗區之間,文化受兩方麵(本書認為南北侗區人種也有所差異)以及漢族文化影響,較為獨特。本書更多的是描述,但沒有闡釋。後記中關於侗族傳統在解放後的斷續令人惋惜。
评分侗族本土學者對所在村寨的民族誌描寫。1930-40年代侗族傳統文化狀況。柳開村位於南北侗區之間,文化受兩方麵(本書認為南北侗區人種也有所差異)以及漢族文化影響,較為獨特。本書更多的是描述,但沒有闡釋。後記中關於侗族傳統在解放後的斷續令人惋惜。
评分侗族本土學者對所在村寨的民族誌描寫。1930-40年代侗族傳統文化狀況。柳開村位於南北侗區之間,文化受兩方麵(本書認為南北侗區人種也有所差異)以及漢族文化影響,較為獨特。本書更多的是描述,但沒有闡釋。後記中關於侗族傳統在解放後的斷續令人惋惜。
本站所有內容均為互聯網搜索引擎提供的公開搜索信息,本站不存儲任何數據與內容,任何內容與數據均與本站無關,如有需要請聯繫相關搜索引擎包括但不限於百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 qciss.net All Rights Reserved. 小哈圖書下載中心 版权所有