具体描述
The nature of the military institution in Brazil, its relations with civilian governments up to 1964, and its use of power since the coup of that year are examined by Alfred Stepan. Throughout his study, while looking at the Brazilian experience, he tests and reformulates implicit and explicit models, propositions, and middle-range hypotheses in the literature of civil-military relations and in political development theory.
Professor Stepan's analysis suggests that many of the expectations and hypotheses held by theoreticians and policymakers about the capabilities of the military in modernization need to be seriously qualified. His discussion of the socio-economic origins and career patterns of the officer corps and of the ideological changes within the Brazilian army makes extensive and systematic use of previously unexploited data: Brazilian military academy files, editorials, interviews with military and civilian leaders. Throughout, the experiences of Asian and African countries are compared to that of Brazil, thus providing a wide comparative framework.
作者简介
Contents: PART I: The Military in Politics: The Institutional Background. 1. Military Organizational Unity and National Orientation: Hypotheses and Qualifications. 2. The Size of the Military: Its Relevance for Political Behavior. 3. Social Origins and Internal Organization of the Officer Corps: Their Political Significance. PART II: The "Moderating Pattern" of Civil-Military Relations: Brazil, 1945-1964. 4. Civilian Aspects of the "Moderating Pattern." 5. The Functioning of the "Moderating Pattern"―A Comparative Analysis of Five Coups, 1945-1964. PART III: The Breakdown of the "Moderating Pattern" of Civil-Military Relations and the Emergence of Military Rule. 6. The Growing Sense of Crisis in the Regime, 1961-1964: Its Impact on the "Moderating Pattern." 7. The Impact of Political and Economic Crises on the Military: Growth of Institutional Fears, 1961-1964. 8. The Impact of Political and Economic Crises on the Military: The Escola Superior de Guerra and the Development of a New Military Ideology. 9. The Assumption of Power―The Revolution of 1964. PART IV: The Brazilian Military in Power, 1964-1968: A Case Study of the Political Problems of Military Government. 10. The Military in Power: First Political Decisions and Problems. 11. Military Unity and Military Succession: An Elite Analysis of the Castello Branco Government. 12. The Military as an Institution Versus the Military as Government. Index.
Originally published in 1971.
The Princeton Legacy Library uses the latest print-on-demand technology to again make available previously out-of-print books from the distinguished backlist of Princeton University Press. These editions preserve the original texts of these important books while presenting them in durable paperback and hardcover editions. The goal of the Princeton Legacy Library is to vastly increase access to the rich scholarly heritage found in the thousands of books published by Princeton University Press since its founding in 1905.
目录信息
读后感
评分
评分
评分
评分
用户评价
作为一名对政治历史有着浓厚兴趣的读者，我一直以来都在寻找能够深入剖析国家权力运作机制的著作。最近，我偶然发现了一本名为《The Military in Politics》的书籍，它立刻抓住了我的眼球。虽然我还没有机会深入阅读，但仅仅从书名和其传递出的主题来看，我就已经充满了期待。我设想这本书会详细探讨军事力量在不同历史时期、不同国家政治格局中所扮演的角色。我希望它能超越表面上的战争叙事，而是深入到军事机构如何影响政策制定、权力分配，乃至国家意识形态形成的过程。 我尤其好奇的是，作者是否会呈现军事力量与文官政府之间的动态关系。是相互制衡，还是存在着某种程度的融合？在某些情况下，军队是否会成为政治稳定的基石，而在另一些情况下，又是否会成为动荡的源头？这本书是否会为我们提供一些理论框架，来理解军事干预政治的深层原因，以及其可能带来的长期后果？我希望它能提供一些引人深思的案例研究，比如某个国家在经历军事政变后，其政治、经济和社会结构是如何发生颠覆性变化的。 我还在思考，这本书是否会触及到军队内部的政治思想以及其与社会思潮的互动。军队作为一种高度组织化的集体，其成员的政治观念是如何形成和演变的？当这些观念与国家主流政治方向产生分歧时，又会引发怎样的连锁反应？我期待作者能够提供一些关于军事精英的政治参与、军事院校的意识形态教育，以及军事力量如何通过宣传和信息控制来塑造公众舆论的分析。这些方面往往是理解军事力量政治影响力的关键视角，也常常被一些宏观历史叙事所忽略。 我对于书中是否会探讨军事技术发展与政治权力之间的关系也充满好奇。在不同的历史阶段，军事技术的进步是否会重塑军队在政治中的地位？例如，核武器的出现，或者信息化战争的兴起，是否都对军事力量介入政治的方式和程度产生了深远的影响？我希望这本书能够提供一些跨越不同时代的视角，展现技术变革如何为军事力量参与政治提供新的可能性，并分析其潜在的风险和挑战。 最后，我希望《The Military in Politics》能够提供一些对当前世界局势具有现实意义的启示。在许多地区，军事力量仍然是影响政治格局的重要因素。通过对历史案例的深入分析，这本书是否能帮助我们更好地理解当前国际政治中的一些热点问题，并为我们提供一个更清晰的视角来审视军事力量与和平、民主之间的复杂关系？我期待它能成为一本能够启发思考、提供深刻见解的著作。
评分作为一个深度关注国家治理和权力运作的读者，《The Military in Politics》这个书名，就像是一盏指示灯，瞬间点燃了我对该领域探索的欲望。我脑海中勾勒出的画面是，这本书不仅仅会罗列军事力量介入政治的事件，而更像是一次深入肌理的解剖，它会精准地揭示出，军事机构如何在国家政治的幕后，通过其独特的资源、结构和影响力，对政策制定、权力分配乃至整个社会走向产生深远的影响。我期待着一场关于政治与军事之间复杂互动的精彩阐述。 我特别希望能在这本书中找到关于军事力量如何主动或被动地参与到政治议程设置中的论述。军队是否会通过其固有的专业知识和信息优势，影响国家安全战略的制定？在一些关键时刻，军队的意见是否会压倒文官政府的决策，从而改变国家发展的方向？我渴望看到一些具体的案例分析，比如，在某个危机时刻，军队是如何通过其力量和影响力，介入到政治决策过程中，并最终塑造了事件的走向，抑或是，军队如何通过长期的战略布局，逐渐侵蚀或重塑了文官政府的权力边界。 我还在猜测，这本书是否会触及到军事力量在国家认同和民族主义建构中的作用。军队作为国家强大的象征，其在维护国家尊严、捍卫国家利益方面的作用，往往会被赋予极高的政治意义。这本书是否会探讨，军事力量是如何通过其历史叙事、象征意义，以及在对外冲突中的表现，来塑造国民的集体记忆和民族认同？我希望能够看到，军事力量是如何利用这种情感连接，来获得民众的支持，并将其转化为政治影响力的。 Moreover, I am keen to discover if the book delves into the mechanisms through which military power translates into political influence. Is it through direct intervention, lobbying, or more subtle forms of co-option and persuasion? I hope the author will provide a nuanced account of these processes, perhaps distinguishing between overt military rule and more covert forms of military dominance over civilian leadership. The clarity on these operational aspects would be highly appreciated. Lastly, I anticipate that the book will offer a critical perspective on the long-term consequences of military involvement in politics. Beyond the immediate political gains, what are the lasting impacts on institutional development, civil liberties, and the overall health of a nation's democracy? I am looking forward to a discussion that not only describes the phenomenon but also evaluates its societal and political repercussions with intellectual rigor.
评分作为一名历史爱好者，我总是在寻找能够提供全新视角、颠覆既有认知的书籍。《The Military in Politics》这个书名，无疑给我带来了强烈的探索欲望。我猜测，这本书并非简单地描述战争的发生，而是会深入到政治的肌理之中，去探究军事力量如何如同暗流般，在国家权力结构中涌动，塑造着政策的走向，甚至改变着历史的轨迹。我期待它能够以一种宏大而精密的视角，为我呈现一幅关于军事力量与政治权力之间错综复杂关系的立体画卷。 我尤其对书中是否会探讨军事力量在政治转型时期的作用感到好奇。一个国家在经历剧烈的政治变革时，军队往往会成为左右局势的关键力量。这本书是否会分析军队在政变、革命或是改革过程中扮演的角色？它是否会揭示军队的决策是如何产生的，以及哪些力量在其中起到了决定性的作用？我希望能够通过这本书，理解军队在维护稳定、推动变革，或是阻碍发展等不同情境下的复杂行为模式，并从中汲取历史的经验教训。 我还在思考，作者是否会深入剖析军事力量与社会结构之间的互动关系。军队并非孤立存在，它的政治影响力往往与社会阶层、意识形态、民族主义情绪等多种因素相互交织。这本书是否会呈现出，军事力量是如何利用或影响这些社会因素，来巩固或扩张其政治权力的？我期待能够看到一些关于军队在国民教育、媒体宣传，以及社会精英层面的渗透的案例分析，从而更全面地理解军事力量的政治渗透力。 Moreover, I'm intrigued by the potential for the book to analyze the impact of different political ideologies on the military's role. Does the nature of the prevailing political system—be it democratic, authoritarian, or otherwise—fundamentally alter how the military engages with politics? I hope to find discussions that differentiate the military's political calculus under various governance structures, perhaps offering case studies that highlight both convergences and divergences in military-political dynamics across diverse national contexts. Finally, my anticipation is that this book will provide a thought-provoking exploration of the inherent tensions between military objectives and democratic principles. How do the hierarchical and often secretive nature of military institutions reconcile with the transparency and accountability expected in civilian governance? I hope to discover how authors have grappled with these fundamental questions, and if they offer any frameworks for navigating this complex relationship, particularly in contemporary global settings.
评分我对《The Military in Politics》这本书充满了期待，因为我一直对国家机器的运作方式，特别是军事力量与政治权力之间的动态关系深感兴趣。我设想这本书将是一部深度剖析的著作，它会从多角度、多层面地展现军事力量如何在不同历史时期、不同国家政治体系中扮演关键角色，而不仅仅是作为一个战争的工具。我希望作者能深入到权力斗争的腹地，揭示出军事力量是如何影响政策制定、塑造政治格局，甚至渗透到国家意识形态的形成过程中的。 我尤其期待书中关于军事力量与文官政府之间复杂博弈的探讨。这种关系是相互制衡，还是存在着一种“合作”的默契？军队在维护国家稳定时，其边界在哪里？又在何时会成为政治动荡的诱因？我希望这本书能够提供一些具有说服力的案例研究，比如，某个国家在军事政变后，其社会结构、经济发展和国际地位是如何发生翻天覆地的变化的。这些具体的例子，将帮助我更深刻地理解军事干预政治的真实后果。 同时，我也对书中是否会涉及军事力量内部的政治思想及其与社会思潮的互动感到好奇。军队作为一个高度组织化的集体，其成员的政治观念是如何形成的？当这些观念与国家的主流政治方向出现偏差时，又会引发怎样的连锁反应？我期待作者能够探讨军事院校的意识形态教育、军官团的政治抱负，以及军队如何利用宣传工具来影响公众舆论。这些往往是被宏观历史叙事所忽略，但却是理解军事力量政治影响力的关键。 Moreover, I'm eager to see if the book addresses the influence of technological advancements on the military's political role. Has the evolution of military technology, from conventional weaponry to cyber capabilities, reshaped how the military interacts with and potentially influences the political sphere? I hope for an exploration of how new technologies might empower or constrain the military's capacity to exert political pressure or achieve strategic objectives through political means. Ultimately, my hope is that 《The Military in Politics》 will provide a valuable lens through which to understand contemporary global affairs. In a world still grappling with the interplay of military might and political decision-making, historical insights are invaluable. I anticipate the book will offer not just an academic account, but also a compelling narrative that illuminates the ongoing challenges and complexities of ensuring civilian control over military power.
评分当我拿起《The Military in Politics》这本书时，我心中充满了对权力游戏背后那些复杂而隐秘的驱动力的探索欲。我预想这本书将是一场宏大的叙事，它不会仅仅停留在罗列事件的表面，而是会像剥洋葱一样，一层层地揭开军事力量与政治权力之间错综复杂的关系。我期待作者能够以一种严谨而富有洞察力的方式，描绘出军事力量在国家治理、政治转型、甚至国际关系中扮演的微妙角色。 我相信，这本书定然会深入探讨军队作为一种独特的社会力量，如何在特定历史条件下，通过其固有的组织结构、纪律性和资源优势，对政治进程产生至关重要的影响。我希望作者能够提供一些理论性的框架，帮助我们理解军事干预的动因，以及军队在不同政治体制下的具体运作模式。是作为维护秩序的工具，还是成为谋求自身利益的操盘手？书中是否会呈现不同政体下，军事力量参与政治的典型案例，并对其成败进行深刻的剖析？ 我特别期待，作者能够挖掘出那些不那么为人熟知，但却极其关键的细节。比如，军队内部的派系斗争如何影响国家决策？军官团的个人野心和政治抱负如何与国家命运交织在一起？这本书是否会披露一些鲜为人知的历史事件，揭示军队如何在幕后悄然推动着政治的走向，抑或是通过某种巧妙的方式，将自己的意志强加于政治精英之上？我希望它能呈现出一个立体而真实的军事力量政治生态。 Moreover, I’m keenly interested in how the book might bridge historical analysis with contemporary relevance. In an era where geopolitical tensions are often amplified by military posturing, understanding the enduring influence of the military in politics is crucial. I hope the author will offer insights into how historical patterns of military involvement in governance might inform our understanding of current events, potentially highlighting recurring themes and cautionary tales. The ability of such a book to illuminate present-day challenges by drawing upon past experiences would be exceptionally valuable. Furthermore, I’m eager to see if the author explores the ideological underpinnings that often accompany military engagement in politics. How do military doctrines and nationalistic sentiments intertwine to shape political objectives? Are there discernible patterns in the rhetoric employed by militaries when they exert political influence? I envision this book delving into the cultural and psychological dimensions of military power, examining how the military's perception of itself and its role in society can profoundly impact its political actions. This nuanced approach would elevate the discussion beyond mere power dynamics.
评分 评分 评分 评分 评分相关图书
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息，本站不存储任何数据与内容，任何内容与数据均与本站无关，如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度，google,bing,sogou 等
© 2026 book.wenda123.org All Rights Reserved. 图书目录大全 版权所有