The Sichuan region has long been the focus of Terry Kleeman's work. His first book, A God's Own Tale (SUNY Press, 1994), told the story of the development of a local Sichuanese snake spirit into the national god of literature, Wenchang. In the present book, Kleeman addresses a little-known chapter in the history of Sichuan: its independent statehood in the first half of the fourth century under the name of Da Cheng, "Great Perfection." He presents us with a careful study of the Cheng state, and the roles played by ethnicity and Daoism in its founding. Cheng seceded from the tumultuous Jin empire in 302 and maintained an independent existence in the Sichuan region for 45 years before being forcibly brought back under Jin rule, Daoism enters the picture by virtue of the fact that the Cheng state's founders, the Li family, had a strong Daoist background. Their ancestors had been members of the Celestial Master Church that had established a Daoist state in the Hanzhong region of northeastern Sichuan during the tw ilight years of the Eastern Han dynasty. When their state was conquered in 215, many adherents of the church were scattered throughout China, among them a man called Li Hu, who led a group of five hundred families northwest to settle in what is now southern Shaanxi province. The reference to "ethnicity" in the book's title is due to the fact that the Li were not ethnic Chinese, but Banshun Man ("Board-shield Man barbarians"), who were part of the larger ethnic category of the Ba. When in the 290s their new homeland was rendered uninhabitable by famine, warfare, and epidemics, Li Hu's descendants led another wave of refugees back to the Hanzhong area, where they were faced with resistance from the local elites. Calling upon old religious and ethnic loyalties, they fought back and by 302 had developed into a full-fledged rebel movement. After its first leader Li Te's death in battle in 303, his son Li Xiong took over. Building upon his father's successes, he widened the rebels' sphere of control until in 306 he formally inaugurated the state of "Great Perfection," with himself as emperor. The chaotic situation in central China at the time made Sichuan appear a secondary concern to a Jin dynasty weakened internally by internecine strife and threatened externally by the invading Xiongnu. Taking advantage of the power vacuum in western China, Cheng expanded until it controlled from its capital Chengdu a sizeable territory stretching over eight hundred kilometers east to west and over nine hundred kilometers north to south. Under the less than brilliant successors of Li Xiong, who died in 334, Cheng (now renamed Han) survived for another thirteen years before being subjugated by the Jin general Huan Wen in 347.
About half of the book, contained in Part 2, is taken up by a meticulous annotated translation of the available sources on the history of this ephemeral state, principally the relevant chapters from the official history of the Jin dynasty, supplemented by the "Record of the Land of Huayang" (Huayangguo zhi), a fourth-century chronicle written by the former Cheng official Chang Qu. The other half (Part 1) consists of four chapters that provide an extensive contextualization for the translated documents. Chapter 1, "Ethnicity and Identity," looks at the ethnic history and prehistory of Sichuan in considerable detail, paying particular attention to the Ba. Chapter 2, "Religion," describes the emergence of the Celestial Master movement in the millennial climate of the late Han dynasty, gives an excellent sketch of the movement's organization and history, and outlines the impact of Celestial Master Daoism on the Cheng state. Chapter 3, "History," places the Sichuanese events within the greater context of Chinese history from the middle of the third to the middle of the fourth century. Finally, Chapter 4, "Sources of Cheng History," takes stock of the source materials on Chen and discusses their editorial history.
All of this adds up to an exhaustive treatment of the chosen topic--exhaustive, and at times exhausting to the reader. One reason for the painstaking character in the chapters on ethnicity and religion maybe that Kleeman considers these two factors important in the history of Cheng, even though they are downplayed by the historiographical bias of the official sources at his disposal. Therefore Kleeman has to bring them in through the back door, so to say: as a background understanding in light of which the sources should be read, allowing the reader to fill in their silences. Hence the great care and attention given to the construction of ethnicity and religion as shaping factors of the destiny of Cheng, factors that are not evident from the sources alone. Without this background knowledge, we would not be able to gauge the true meaning of key events in Cheng history. To use religion as an example, the support given the Lis at a critical juncture by the leader of a Daoist community becomes understandable whe n we are aware of the Lis' own Daoist heritage, and specific government policies of the first Cheng emperor Li Xiong make more sense when we see them as concrete applications of Daoist principles. Kleeman's argument about the importance of religion and ethnicity in the history of Cheng is impossible to prove conclusively from the sources, given their nature, but he patiently builds a plausible case. In doing so, he achieves an extremely high degree of contextualization, but at the same time he continuously runs the risk of overtaxing his reader's patience. Chapter 1, for example, is a fascinating overview of ethnic history and ethnic relations in Sichuan from prehistorical times to the fourth century, but its wealth of detail seems out of proportion to its eventual contribution to our understanding of Cheng history. To be sure, it is important to know the Ba ethnicity of the Cheng dynastic founders insofar as it throws light on some of the alliances they were able to forge with other non-Chinese forces. But d oes it really add much to our understanding when the author discusses at length the etymology of the Chinese character "Shu" (the ancient name for Sichuan), or when he examines in detail (including long translated excerpts from the Zuozhuan) the interactions of Ba with Zhou period feudal states? The resulting surfeit of contextual detail is all the more difficult to digest as the reader at this point does not yet have a clear idea what it is all leading up to. The author provides some links to the events surrounding the founding of Cheng, but sometimes they add more confusion than they resolve because they assume knowledge of specific events that are only introduced later in the book. In spite of such minor irritants, the persistent reader will be compensated in the end with insights into the often underestimated roles of religion and ethnicity in Chinese history. Add to this the superb editing provided by the University of Hawai'i Press, with Chinese characters inserted both in the main text and in the index , and this book will be a rewarding, if demanding, read for any student of medieval Chinese society.
About half of the book, contained in Part 2, is taken up by a meticulous annotated translation of the available sources on the history of this ephemeral state, principally the relevant chapters from the official history of the Jin dynasty, supplemented by the "Record of the Land of Huayang" (Huayangguo zhi), a fourth-century chronicle written by the former Cheng official Chang Qu. The other half (Part 1) consists of four chapters that provide an extensive contextualization for the translated documents. Chapter 1, "Ethnicity and Identity," looks at the ethnic history and prehistory of Sichuan in considerable detail, paying particular attention to the Ba. Chapter 2, "Religion," describes the emergence of the Celestial Master movement in the millennial climate of the late Han dynasty, gives an excellent sketch of the movement's organization and history, and outlines the impact of Celestial Master Daoism on the Cheng state. Chapter 3, "History," places the Sichuanese events within the greater context of Chinese history from the middle of the third to the middle of the fourth century. Finally, Chapter 4, "Sources of Cheng History," takes stock of the source materials on Chen and discusses their editorial history.
All of this adds up to an exhaustive treatment of the chosen topic--exhaustive, and at times exhausting to the reader. One reason for the painstaking character in the chapters on ethnicity and religion maybe that Kleeman considers these two factors important in the history of Cheng, even though they are downplayed by the historiographical bias of the official sources at his disposal. Therefore Kleeman has to bring them in through the back door, so to say: as a background understanding in light of which the sources should be read, allowing the reader to fill in their silences. Hence the great care and attention given to the construction of ethnicity and religion as shaping factors of the destiny of Cheng, factors that are not evident from the sources alone. Without this background knowledge, we would not be able to gauge the true meaning of key events in Cheng history. To use religion as an example, the support given the Lis at a critical juncture by the leader of a Daoist community becomes understandable whe n we are aware of the Lis' own Daoist heritage, and specific government policies of the first Cheng emperor Li Xiong make more sense when we see them as concrete applications of Daoist principles. Kleeman's argument about the importance of religion and ethnicity in the history of Cheng is impossible to prove conclusively from the sources, given their nature, but he patiently builds a plausible case. In doing so, he achieves an extremely high degree of contextualization, but at the same time he continuously runs the risk of overtaxing his reader's patience. Chapter 1, for example, is a fascinating overview of ethnic history and ethnic relations in Sichuan from prehistorical times to the fourth century, but its wealth of detail seems out of proportion to its eventual contribution to our understanding of Cheng history. To be sure, it is important to know the Ba ethnicity of the Cheng dynastic founders insofar as it throws light on some of the alliances they were able to forge with other non-Chinese forces. But d oes it really add much to our understanding when the author discusses at length the etymology of the Chinese character "Shu" (the ancient name for Sichuan), or when he examines in detail (including long translated excerpts from the Zuozhuan) the interactions of Ba with Zhou period feudal states? The resulting surfeit of contextual detail is all the more difficult to digest as the reader at this point does not yet have a clear idea what it is all leading up to. The author provides some links to the events surrounding the founding of Cheng, but sometimes they add more confusion than they resolve because they assume knowledge of specific events that are only introduced later in the book. In spite of such minor irritants, the persistent reader will be compensated in the end with insights into the often underestimated roles of religion and ethnicity in Chinese history. Add to this the superb editing provided by the University of Hawai'i Press, with Chinese characters inserted both in the main text and in the index , and this book will be a rewarding, if demanding, read for any student of medieval Chinese society.
Terry F. Kleeman, Associate Professor, (Ph.D., University of California at Berkeley) teaches East Asian religious traditions. His research focuses on Daoism and Chinese popular religion. He is the author of A God's Own Tale: The Book of Transformation of Wenchang and Great Perfection: Religion and Ethnicity in a Chinese Millenial Kingdom, as well as articles on Daoist popular god cults, mountain deities, and local religion. He is the President of the Society for the Study of Chinese Religions and managing editor of the journal Studies in Central and East Asian Religions. He has a joint appointment in East Asian Languages and Civilizations.
评分
评分
评分
评分
这本书的世界观设定,可以说是它最引人入胜却又最令人迷惑的基石。作者构建了一个庞大且逻辑自洽的体系,充满了独有的术语、历史的断层和尚未完全揭示的规则。我花费了大量的精力去梳理这些元素,试图将散落在不同章节的线索拼凑起来,形成一个完整的地图。让我印象深刻的是,作者并没有采取那种“新手教程”式的解释,而是将这些设定如同文物碎片一样,零星地丢给读者,让你必须自己去挖掘它们的历史和功能。起初,我感到相当的挫败,仿佛手里拿着一本没有目录的古代典籍。但随着阅读的深入,当你开始理解某个看似无关紧要的仪式或某种特定建筑的意义时,那种豁然开朗的体验是无与伦比的。这就像是破解了一组只有少数人知道的密码,你会产生一种强烈的“圈内人”的优越感。当然,这种复杂性也意味着,如果你只是想找一本轻松愉快的读物,这本书可能不太适合你,它要求你带着笔记本去阅读,去标记,去绘制思维导图,才能真正领略到其构建的宏伟蓝图。
评分这本小说的叙事节奏简直是一场精心的马拉松,作者显然对如何逐步揭开谜底有着近乎偏执的掌控欲。开篇并非那种直奔主题、火力全开的猛冲,反而像是在一片浓雾中艰难跋涉,每一个角色的登场都带着三分的疏离和七分的神秘。我花了将近三分之一的篇幅才真正开始感觉到故事的脉络在眼前清晰起来,那种感觉就像是透过陈年的玻璃窗,终于瞥见了窗外的繁华景象。特别是主角的心理刻画,细腻到了令人发指的地步,他每一个微小的犹豫、每一次转瞬即逝的念头,都被作者用近乎散文诗的笔触描摹出来。我甚至能感受到他那份藏在平静外表下的躁动不安,那种对既定命运的反抗,虽然被压抑得极深,却如同地底深处的岩浆,随时有喷薄而出的可能。不过,也正因为这种慢热的布局,对于那些期待一上来就有高潮迭起的读者来说,可能会略感不耐烦。但请相信我,一旦你熬过了最初的铺陈,后续的张力会以一种内敛而强大的方式爆发,它不是那种炸裂的烟火,而是深海中无声的引力,将你牢牢吸入其中,难以自拔。这本书需要的不仅仅是阅读时间,更需要一种沉浸式的耐心去体味,去跟随作者的呼吸节奏。
评分我必须承认,这本书的语言风格像极了一杯陈年的波尔多红酒,初尝时或许感觉过于厚重、带着一丝难以捉摸的涩味,但当你让它在舌尖停留足够久,那种复杂的层次感和悠长的回味便会全然释放出来。作者似乎非常钟爱使用那些略显晦涩但极富画面感的词汇,每一次转折都充满了文学上的野心。我尤其欣赏作者在描述环境时的笔法,那些建筑物、街道、甚至空气中的尘埃,都被赋予了超越其物理属性的象征意义。比如,某个阴冷的早晨,作者描绘了光线穿过窗棂时,如何在古老的木地板上投下斑驳的几何图形,那一刻我仿佛真的置身于那个时间仿佛停滞的房间里,感受到了一种历史的重量和岁月的无情。这种风格无疑提升了作品的艺术格调,但同时也带来了一个挑战:阅读过程中的“理解负担”。我时不时需要停下来,反复咀嚼那些句子,试图捕捉作者藏在字里行间的深层意图。它不是那种让你放松大脑,随波逐流的小说,更像是一场需要你全神贯注参与的智力博弈,每一段文字都可能是通往下一个真相的钥匙。
评分与其他同类型题材的作品相比,这部作品在处理“冲突”的处理上显得尤为克制和内敛。你不会在书中看到大量的直接对抗或口角之争,那种你来我往的激烈交锋被巧妙地替换成了一种精神层面的角力。主要人物之间的矛盾,往往体现在他们眼神的交错、沉默的时长,以及他们对同一事件截然不同的叙事角度上。这要求读者必须具备高度的观察力和共情能力,去捕捉那些“未说出口的话”的力量。例如,两个曾经的盟友在茶桌前的对话,表面上风平浪静,谈论着天气和日常琐事,但空气中弥漫的张力却足以让人屏息。每一次礼貌的微笑背后,都可能隐藏着深思熟虑的算计或无法弥补的裂痕。这种微妙的平衡感处理得极为精妙,它让读者始终处于一种“悬而未决”的状态,既期待真相的揭露,又享受这种步步为营的推测乐趣。这种处理方式,无疑是对传统戏剧冲突模式的一种大胆颠覆,展现了作者对人性复杂性的深刻洞察。
评分从结构上来看,作者采取了一种非常规的非线性叙事手法,时间轴被有意地打碎、重组,并在不同角色的记忆和当前行动之间不断跳跃。这不像是一条河流,更像是一张交织着无数细线的挂毯,你必须从不同的角度去观察,才能看到整体的图案。起初,这种碎片化的叙述方式让我感到些许混乱,总觉得故事的连续性受到了干扰,读完一个章节后,常常需要花几分钟来重新定位自己“现在”在哪里,以及“之前”发生了什么。然而,正是这种看似混乱的结构,有效地模拟了人类记忆和历史的运作方式——我们并非总是按部就班地记住一切,而是通过闪回、联想和情感触发来重构过去。随着故事的推进,我逐渐领悟到,作者正是利用这种手法,来巧妙地控制信息的释放速度,确保读者在每一个关键时刻都能获得恰到好处的震撼。它迫使我们主动去填补那些时间上的鸿沟,这种参与感,远比被动接受叙述要深刻得多,也更具回味价值。
评分提供了一個對早期天師道發展的本地風土以及政權更替等歷史背景的詳細介紹。兩個大不足:1. 史料堆砌且材料多為官史,雖然開頭提到了材料的侷限性,但行文過程中卻未能將此意識有效帶入。2. 對政權和宗教之間的關聯探討不足,僅僅只是將二者分而析之,此不足一則是材料侷限所致,二則乃是作者自身對材料的邏輯敘述解讀不夠造成的。
评分提供了一個對早期天師道發展的本地風土以及政權更替等歷史背景的詳細介紹。兩個大不足:1. 史料堆砌且材料多為官史,雖然開頭提到了材料的侷限性,但行文過程中卻未能將此意識有效帶入。2. 對政權和宗教之間的關聯探討不足,僅僅只是將二者分而析之,此不足一則是材料侷限所致,二則乃是作者自身對材料的邏輯敘述解讀不夠造成的。
评分提供了一個對早期天師道發展的本地風土以及政權更替等歷史背景的詳細介紹。兩個大不足:1. 史料堆砌且材料多為官史,雖然開頭提到了材料的侷限性,但行文過程中卻未能將此意識有效帶入。2. 對政權和宗教之間的關聯探討不足,僅僅只是將二者分而析之,此不足一則是材料侷限所致,二則乃是作者自身對材料的邏輯敘述解讀不夠造成的。
评分提供了一個對早期天師道發展的本地風土以及政權更替等歷史背景的詳細介紹。兩個大不足:1. 史料堆砌且材料多為官史,雖然開頭提到了材料的侷限性,但行文過程中卻未能將此意識有效帶入。2. 對政權和宗教之間的關聯探討不足,僅僅只是將二者分而析之,此不足一則是材料侷限所致,二則乃是作者自身對材料的邏輯敘述解讀不夠造成的。
评分提供了一個對早期天師道發展的本地風土以及政權更替等歷史背景的詳細介紹。兩個大不足:1. 史料堆砌且材料多為官史,雖然開頭提到了材料的侷限性,但行文過程中卻未能將此意識有效帶入。2. 對政權和宗教之間的關聯探討不足,僅僅只是將二者分而析之,此不足一則是材料侷限所致,二則乃是作者自身對材料的邏輯敘述解讀不夠造成的。
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2026 book.wenda123.org All Rights Reserved. 图书目录大全 版权所有