From Publishers Weekly This simultaneously sensitive and ridiculous romp by a Newbery-winning author (Walk Two Moons) begins as spunky nine-year-old Dennis explains that ghosts keep visiting him in his bedroom?"a constant parade of ghosts, but never the one I really want." Pining for his late father, Dennis instead finds himself host to a motley crew of spirits, in particular his Uncle Arvie. Arvie wants Dennis to help his widow, Aunt Julia, discover the gifts and money he has left hidden for her in his house. Unfortunately, a stroke he suffered before his death prevents him from finding the appropriate vocabulary to convey his meaning. Kids will enjoy deciphering Arvie's speech: "Good carpet, Dinosaur!" translates as "Good morning, Dennis!"; Aunt Julia's oily suitor and Billy, the class bully, are "beany boogers." Dennis's much-missed father?his "pepperoni"?never does appear, but the boy finds common ground and a possible friendship with Billy, also fatherless. Arvie's earnest affection for Julia and Dennis makes him a role model as well as a clown, and Creech's attention to nuances of feeling grounds this light tale in emotional truth. Ages 8-12. Copyright 1996 Reed Business Information, Inc. --This text refers to an out of print or unavailable edition of this title. From School Library Journal Grade 3-5-A disappointing tale about a boy led on a treasure hunt by a ghost. Dennis, nine, has received a parade of spectral visitors since his father's death, though none, alas, is the one he wishes to see. Occasionally, the boy recognizes deceased family members, including his late Uncle Arvie, who wishes to pass on messages to his widow, Julia. Because Arvie's speech was garbled in life by a severe stroke, helping him communicate is no easy task for Dennis. Ultimately, however, Arvie leads him to a small fortune, which will ensure Julia's lifelong comfort. In a subplot, Dennis proves to a disbelieving classmate that his ability to see ghosts is real. This story falls short on several fronts. Character development is particularly ineffective. Dennis, for example, is so easily absorbed in Arvie's affairs that it is difficult, if not impossible, to perceive him as a boy grieving for his father. While linguistic problems are caused by strokes, Arvie's nonsense syllables seem exaggerated to the point of caricature, thus creating an offensive effect. Billy, Dennis's classmate who also lost his father, thinks Dennis is making fun of him with his talk of ghosts, and in retaliation, smashes several windows in his home. In a tale obviously meant to be lighthearted, Billy's anger seems extreme and inappropriate. The ending reflects Dennis's hopes of someday seeing his father's ghost, but by this point, readers may not care enough about him to wonder whether or not it ever happens.Mary Jo Drungil, Niles Public Library District, ILCopyright 1996 Reed Business Information, Inc. --This text refers to an out of print or unavailable edition of this title. See all Editorial Reviews"
评分
评分
评分
评分
这本书的结构宛如一座精心设计的巴洛克式建筑,层层叠叠,充满了回廊和错觉,初看之下或许有些眼花缭乱,但一旦掌握了其内在的逻辑,便会为其精巧的布局所折服。作者对不同叙事视角的切换,处理得犹如一个技艺高超的魔术师,你以为你看到了全部,但每一次视角转换,都会让你发现之前认定的“事实”不过是冰山一角。这种多重叙事入口的设计,极大地增强了文本的密度和可重读性。我至少已经回读了两遍核心的转折部分,每一次都能发现之前忽略掉的关键信息点,这些信息点散布在看似无关紧要的段落之中,考验着读者的耐心和细致程度。这种写作方式要求读者不仅是接受故事,更是在主动参与到故事的建构过程中。而且,这本书在探讨“权力”和“被操控”这一宏大主题时,并没有采取宏大的叙事手法,而是将其缩小到最微观的人际关系和家庭结构中去,通过展示个体如何在无形的力量下被塑形和规训,达到了强烈的讽刺效果。它像一面镜子,虽然映照的是虚构的世界,却让人不得不正视我们自身所处的环境。
评分我必须承认,一开始我对这本书的期待值并不算太高,毕竟市场上同类题材的作品已经泛滥成灾,我以为这又会是一部在既有框架内打转的平庸之作。然而,这本书最成功的地方,在于它彻底打破了我对传统叙事结构的固有认知。它的章节划分、时间线的跳跃,都显得极具实验性,但这种“实验”绝非故弄玄虚,而是服务于它对“疏离感”的极致追求。作者似乎着迷于描绘人与人之间那种微妙的、看似亲近实则遥远的心理距离。角色之间的对话往往充满了潜台词,那些没有说出口的部分,比实际的言语内容更具信息量。这种留白的处理,需要读者投入极大的注意力去解码。对于那些追求一目了然、情节推进迅速的读者来说,这本书可能会显得有些晦涩难懂,甚至拖沓。但我恰恰是喜欢这种需要“劳动”的阅读过程,每一次成功解读一个隐喻,都像是在黑暗中点亮了一盏小小的油灯。书中关于城市景观的描摹,也极富特色,那种冰冷、疏离的都市气息,几乎可以透过纸面感受到。它不是描绘城市的喧嚣,而是聚焦于城市角落里那些被遗忘的、沉默的细节,这些细节最终汇集成了一种强大的情绪氛围,将读者牢牢锁在故事的基调之中。
评分坦率地说,这本书的文学野心是显而易见的,它试图在情节驱动和哲学思辨之间找到一个完美的平衡点,这一点值得称赞。作者构建的世界观,虽然建立在非常现实的背景之上,但通过对细节的极端化处理,营造出一种令人不安的“真实感”。我尤其欣赏书中对“时间流逝”这一概念的独特处理方式。时间在这里不是线性的刻度,而更像是一种可以被压缩、拉伸甚至扭曲的物质。某些场景的描写,仿佛被放慢了无数倍,每一个呼吸、每一个眼神的交汇都被赋予了漫长的重量,而另一些关键性的转折却在几句话之间完成,这种节奏上的反差,制造了一种强烈的时空错位感。这种非线性的时间体验,成功地模仿了人类在面对巨大压力或创伤时,主观时间感失序的真实状态。从技术层面上讲,作者对句式的驾驭能力非常高超,长句充满韵律感,短句则如匕首般精准有力。这本书无疑会成为文学评论界讨论的焦点,因为它在看似平静的表面下,蕴含着对现代社会异化和个体失语现象的深刻反思,绝对是今年不容错过的力作。
评分读完这本书,我感到一种近乎原始的震撼,不是因为情节有多么曲折离奇,而是因为它触及到了一个非常私密且普遍存在的焦虑点——关于“身份”的易变性和脆弱性。作者似乎对存在主义哲学有着深刻的理解,并将这种哲思巧妙地融入到日常生活琐碎的描写之中。比如,主角对一个日常物品的执着,最终被证明与其核心身份认知有着千丝万缕的联系,这种细节的铺陈极其精妙,体现了作者对主题的掌控力。这本书的语言风格是极其克制的,它很少使用夸张的形容词来渲染情绪,而是通过精确的动词和对感官细节的捕捉,让情绪自然地涌现出来。这种“少即是多”的写作手法,使得一旦出现情绪爆发点,其效果便如同火山喷发般具有毁灭性。我特别欣赏作者在处理配角时的笔法,他们绝非扁平化的工具人,每一个都有自己完整的、未被完全展开的生命轨迹,这让整个故事世界观显得异常丰满和真实。唯一略感遗憾的是,结局的处理略显仓促,虽然符合全书的疏离调性,但对于一些埋下的伏笔,我个人还是希望能看到更圆满的收束,尽管理智上明白这可能违背了作者的初衷。
评分这本书的叙事节奏简直像是夏日午后的一场骤雨,来得突然,去得也快,却在心头留下了一片湿润的痕迹。我得说,作者对于人物内心世界的刻画达到了令人惊叹的细腻程度。主角的行为逻辑在故事发展中不断被推向新的边界,每一次选择都像是在走钢丝,让人紧张得手心冒汗。更妙的是,作者并没有急于给出是非对错的评判,而是将选择的重量完全交给了读者去掂量。那种在道德模糊地带游走的挣扎感,被描绘得淋漓尽致,仿佛我就是那个身陷囹圄的主人公。特别是关于“记忆的不可靠性”这一主题的处理,高明之处在于,它不是作为背景设定出现,而是直接驱动了情节的每一次反转。读到某个关键章节时,我甚至需要停下来,回溯前面的文字,试图拼凑出一个自认为“正确”的叙事线索,但每一次的努力最终都只是加深了真相的迷雾。这种智力上的博弈感,让阅读体验远超一般的消遣,更像是一场精心设计的迷宫探险。全书的语言风格也很有特点,时而如诗歌般华美,时而又回归到冷硬的纪实笔调,这种风格的切换处理得非常自然,毫不突兀,反而增强了故事的层次感和冲击力。这本书的后劲很大,合上书页之后,那种挥之不去的悬置感会持续很久,让人忍不住反思自己对“真实”的定义。
评分 评分 评分 评分 评分本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2026 book.wenda123.org All Rights Reserved. 图书目录大全 版权所有