Preface<br > ,t<br >Majority and Minority began in 1968 as a collaborative effort with C. Hoy Steele,<br >who was then a graduate student in American Studies at The University of Kansas.<br >Hoy and ] shared academic interests in the phenomena of race and ethnicity in<br >American life. We also shared a commitment to the realization of a society free<br >of ethnic and racial inequality and injustice--the dream of which Martin Luther<br >King, Jr., so eloquently spoke. The sense of urgency with which we approached<br >the analysis of racial and ethnic relations was influenced not only by national<br >protest movements to end racial oppression but equally, and more directly, by the<br >racial tension and conflict that brought the community of Lawrence, Kansas, na-<br >tional notoriety. In both the first and second editions, we sought to emphasize the<br >practical--as well as theoretical--need for a more fundamental understanding of<br >the dynamics of racial and ethnic relations. We also were convinced of the irre-<br >levance of analysis and "understanding" that is not complemented by action to<br >alter existing systems of inequality.<br > Therefore, in both the first (1971) and second editions (1975), we sought to<br >analyze the dynamics of American racial and ethnic relations from within the<br >context of a more general theoretical understanding of the broader field of majority-<br >minority relations. The basic assumption underlying both editions was that the<br >study of racial and ethnic relations should focus primarily on the patterns of dif-<br > ferential power and intergroup conflict. Emphasis on power and conflict in the<br > analysis of majority-minority relations was at that time not the primary thrust of<br > research in the field. For many years, the conventional wisdom among social<br > scientists dealing with issues of race and ethnicity was dominated by approaches<br > that ignored or underestimated the importance of conflict and power. It is perhaps<br > an instructive commentary on the state of sociological theory during the 1950s and<br > early 1960s that many of the most effective critics of mainstream approaches to<br > the study of race and ethnicity during the 1960s were social critics---often minority<br > group members--who stood outside the mainstream of the professional social<br > science disciplines. Articulate minority spokespersons were instrumental in graph-<br > ically demonstrating the role of differential power in maintaining a racist social<br > system and the presence of conflict as an inherent component of majority-minority<br > relations.<br > Our interest in power and conflict therefore led us to place strong emphasis<br > on sociological explanations of the dynamics of majority-minority relations. We<br > felt that the fundamental determinants of these situations are to be found in the<br > VII<br >
评分
评分
评分
评分
这本书的封面设计简直让人眼前一亮,那种深沉的蓝配上略带做旧感的字体,仿佛在暗示着某种宏大叙事即将展开。我原本是抱着一种探索历史深层结构的心态去翻阅它的,期待能从中挖掘出一些关于权力动态和群体心理的全新见解。初读之下,它确实没有让我失望,作者的笔触细腻而有力,描绘了社会变迁中那些边缘声音是如何被逐渐塑造,又是如何悄然积蓄力量,最终影响整个图景的。我特别欣赏作者处理细节的手法,比如对早期社会组织中非正式权力网络的刻画,那种微妙的张力与平衡,读起来酣畅淋漓。不过,有一点稍显不足的是,在探讨现代语境下的议题时,论证的跳跃性略大,有时需要读者自己去填补一些概念上的逻辑链条,这对于初次接触相关理论的读者来说,可能需要反复咀嚼才能完全领会其深意。整体而言,它更像是一份精心绘制的社会地图,标记出了那些看不见的断层线,引人深思。
评分这是一本需要反复阅读才能真正领会其精髓的“内功心法”式的书籍。它的厉害之处在于,它提供了一套观察世界的底层逻辑框架,一旦掌握,你会发现原本看似毫不相关的社会现象之间都建立起了清晰的内在联系。作者对历史的宏观把握能力令人叹服,他总能从浩如烟海的史料中提炼出最具穿透力的本质。我特别喜欢它那种不回避矛盾的勇气,直面了社会张力的必然性和复杂性,没有提供任何廉价的、一劳永逸的解决方案,这让我感到非常踏实和真实。这本书的阅读过程更像是一场智力上的“搏击”,你必须不断地提出异议,然后又被作者提供的更深层次的论据所说服,这种交锋的过程本身就是一种极高的享受。唯一的建议是,对于那些期待快速获得“标准答案”的读者来说,这本书可能会让人感到有些挫败,因为它要求的是深度的参与和持续的思考,而不是被动的接受。
评分这本书的阅读体验非常具有挑战性,但回报也同样丰厚。它不是那种可以轻松窝在沙发上消磨时间的读物,更像是一场需要全神贯注的智力跋涉。作者似乎有一种将复杂理论直观化的魔力,他用一系列精妙的案例研究来佐证其核心论点,这些案例跨越了不同的文化和时代,展现了惊人的普适性。我花了很长时间去消化其中关于“共识的构建”那一章,那段文字充满了哲学的思辨和严谨的逻辑推演,简直像是在解一道极其复杂的数学题,每一步的证明都必须仔细审视。我尤其喜欢作者在叙事中不时流露出的那种冷静的批判精神,他没有简单地将任何一方塑造成绝对的善或恶,而是深入探究了结构性因素是如何驱使个体做出选择的。如果非要说有什么遗憾,或许是某些篇章的语言略显晦涩,那些学术性的术语堆砌起来,让我在某些关键的转折点不得不放慢速度,甚至需要查阅一些背景资料才能确保理解的准确性。
评分我是在朋友的强烈推荐下接触到这本著作的,坦白说,最初是被它充满力量感的标题所吸引。这本书的结构安排非常巧妙,它不是按照时间线索平铺直叙,而是以一种螺旋上升的方式,层层深入地剖析同一个核心母题在不同维度下的表现。读完第一部分,我感觉自己对现有的一些社会现象有了一个全新的、去标签化的视角;而进入到后半部分,作者开始探讨如何通过微观层面的互动来重塑宏观的权力平衡,这部分内容对我个人职业发展上的启发是巨大的。它教会我,即便是最小的集体中,权力关系的微妙变化也蕴含着颠覆性的潜力。叙事的节奏把握得极好,既有学术论文的深度,又不失文学作品的韵味,读起来就像是在聆听一位经验丰富的大师在娓娓道来他毕生的观察与总结。唯一的缺点或许是,某些引用的文献似乎有些年代感了,希望未来再版时能加入更多近期的研究成果,让论证更具时效性。
评分这本书给我带来的最大震撼,在于它对“沉默”这一行为的深度挖掘。作者没有将注意力仅仅集中在那些公开的冲突和鲜明的对立面上,而是将聚光灯投向了那些被默认接受、被视为理所当然的社会规范和潜规则是如何悄无声息地巩固既有秩序的。我读到有关信息控制和符号霸权的部分时,感触尤为深刻,那些看似无害的日常语言和媒体叙事,原来是如此精心地编织了一张限制想象力的网。这本书的语言风格非常独特,它不像传统的社会学著作那样板着面孔,反而带着一种近乎诗意的反思和尖锐的讽刺交织的独特韵味。特别是书中关于“合法性危机”的分析,描绘得淋漓尽致,让人在拍案叫绝之余,也不禁反思自身在这一体系中所扮演的角色。美中不足的是,全书的案例虽然丰富,但情感温度似乎略显不足,如果能在对那些在结构性压迫下挣扎的个体故事上多着墨一些,或许能更好地触动更广泛的读者群体。
评分 评分 评分 评分 评分本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2026 book.wenda123.org All Rights Reserved. 图书目录大全 版权所有