John Anthony McGuckin, an Orthodox theologian, is Reader in Patristic and Byzantine Theology at the University of Leeds, England, and a Fellow of the Royal Historical Society, London.
The Christological Controversy describes the turmoil of fifth-century Christianity seeking to articulate its beliefs on the person of Christ. The policies of the Theodosian dynasty and the conflicting interests of the patriarchal sees are the context of the controversy between Nestorius of Constantinople and Cyril of Alexandria, a bitter dispute that racked the entire oecumene. The historical analysis expounds on the arguments of both sides, particularly the Christology of Cyril, which was adopted as a standard.
评分
评分
评分
评分
系统的捋了一遍Cyril和聂斯托利的基督论。正统都是在交锋中逐渐构建的,也算是聂斯托利命中注定在历史的进程中做那个引起争议的人。Cyril和聂斯托利就不应该拿来比较:两人的方法论,出发点都不一样。聂斯托利想要logical and terminological clarity, 而亚历山大学派的特色就是paradoxical and mystical tradition. Cyril对2 natures结合的看法oddly Aristotelian,然后现在终于弄明白Cyril的基督论和soteriology的关系了。He is ok with passive humanity that is 'used', but not playing an active role of work.
评分系统的捋了一遍Cyril和聂斯托利的基督论。正统都是在交锋中逐渐构建的,也算是聂斯托利命中注定在历史的进程中做那个引起争议的人。Cyril和聂斯托利就不应该拿来比较:两人的方法论,出发点都不一样。聂斯托利想要logical and terminological clarity, 而亚历山大学派的特色就是paradoxical and mystical tradition. Cyril对2 natures结合的看法oddly Aristotelian,然后现在终于弄明白Cyril的基督论和soteriology的关系了。He is ok with passive humanity that is 'used', but not playing an active role of work.
评分系统的捋了一遍Cyril和聂斯托利的基督论。正统都是在交锋中逐渐构建的,也算是聂斯托利命中注定在历史的进程中做那个引起争议的人。Cyril和聂斯托利就不应该拿来比较:两人的方法论,出发点都不一样。聂斯托利想要logical and terminological clarity, 而亚历山大学派的特色就是paradoxical and mystical tradition. Cyril对2 natures结合的看法oddly Aristotelian,然后现在终于弄明白Cyril的基督论和soteriology的关系了。He is ok with passive humanity that is 'used', but not playing an active role of work.
评分系统的捋了一遍Cyril和聂斯托利的基督论。正统都是在交锋中逐渐构建的,也算是聂斯托利命中注定在历史的进程中做那个引起争议的人。Cyril和聂斯托利就不应该拿来比较:两人的方法论,出发点都不一样。聂斯托利想要logical and terminological clarity, 而亚历山大学派的特色就是paradoxical and mystical tradition. Cyril对2 natures结合的看法oddly Aristotelian,然后现在终于弄明白Cyril的基督论和soteriology的关系了。He is ok with passive humanity that is 'used', but not playing an active role of work.
评分系统的捋了一遍Cyril和聂斯托利的基督论。正统都是在交锋中逐渐构建的,也算是聂斯托利命中注定在历史的进程中做那个引起争议的人。Cyril和聂斯托利就不应该拿来比较:两人的方法论,出发点都不一样。聂斯托利想要logical and terminological clarity, 而亚历山大学派的特色就是paradoxical and mystical tradition. Cyril对2 natures结合的看法oddly Aristotelian,然后现在终于弄明白Cyril的基督论和soteriology的关系了。He is ok with passive humanity that is 'used', but not playing an active role of work.
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.wenda123.org All Rights Reserved. 图书目录大全 版权所有