As today's new technologies challenge the reign of writing, Clifford Siskin puts our current concerns about such change into history. In the 18th and early 19th centuries in Britain, he argues, the "new" technology was writing itself. How did its proliferation-in print and through silent reading-coalesce into the dominant forms of literary modernity, and with what consequences? What changed, strikingly and fundamentally, were ways of knowing and of working. Admonitions against young women reading novels were not merely matters of Augustan conservatism but signals of those shifts: they warned against the capacity of the technology to change those who used it. Despite such caution, Britain saw, between 1700 and 1830, the advent of both modern disciplinarity and modern professionalism. These new divisions of knowledge and of labor were the work of writing, as was the engendering, at their intersection, of the discipline that took writing itself as its professional work-Literature.
具体描述
读后感
评分
评分
评分
评分
用户评价
说siskin是新历史主义是不正确的。他是马克思的，同时又是往前的，怀念跟他修课的日子，虽然他也许早忘了我。
评分说siskin是新历史主义是不正确的。他是马克思的，同时又是往前的，怀念跟他修课的日子，虽然他也许早忘了我。
评分说siskin是新历史主义是不正确的。他是马克思的，同时又是往前的，怀念跟他修课的日子，虽然他也许早忘了我。
评分说siskin是新历史主义是不正确的。他是马克思的，同时又是往前的，怀念跟他修课的日子，虽然他也许早忘了我。
评分说siskin是新历史主义是不正确的。他是马克思的，同时又是往前的，怀念跟他修课的日子，虽然他也许早忘了我。
相关图书
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息，本站不存储任何数据与内容，任何内容与数据均与本站无关，如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度，google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.wenda123.org All Rights Reserved. 图书目录大全 版权所有