Exploring such questions as "how did fact become modernity's most favoured unit of knowledge?", this text contains ideas and texts from the publication of the first British manual on double-entry bookkeeping in 1588 to the institutionalization of statistics in the 1830s. It shows how the production of systematic knowledge from descriptions of observed particulars influenced government; how numerical representation became the privileged vehicle for generating useful facts; and how belief - whether figured as credit, credibility, or credulity - remained essential to the production of knowledge.
具体描述
读后感
评分
评分
评分
评分
用户评价
ppl who rely on this book and cite her are often much less careful, not aware of the dangers in an literary reading of selected sources in science. Therefore would recommend anyone interested in this field to actually read it and also c.f. Margaret Jacob's critique in History and Theory, 2001.
评分大部头。偶啃完了。 普维老太太俺也是用心学了一把。
评分"We should admit that power produces knowledge; that power and knowledge directly imply one another; that there is no power relation without the correlative constitution of a field of knowledge, nor any knowledge that does not presuppose and constitue at the same time power relations" (Foucault 1977:28)
评分"We should admit that power produces knowledge; that power and knowledge directly imply one another; that there is no power relation without the correlative constitution of a field of knowledge, nor any knowledge that does not presuppose and constitue at the same time power relations" (Foucault 1977:28)
评分"We should admit that power produces knowledge; that power and knowledge directly imply one another; that there is no power relation without the correlative constitution of a field of knowledge, nor any knowledge that does not presuppose and constitue at the same time power relations" (Foucault 1977:28)
相关图书
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息，本站不存储任何数据与内容，任何内容与数据均与本站无关，如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度，google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.wenda123.org All Rights Reserved. 图书目录大全 版权所有