Is Theory dead? Is it, as skeptics suggest, too distant from anything 'real' to be useful, too sweeping in its referral of all texts to grand theses? Or is it a mask for fashion and self-promotion in academia? In this controversial manifesto, Jean-Michel Rabate addresses current anxieties about theory and claims that it still has a crucial role to play. Acknowledging that he cannot speak about the future of theory without taking stock of its past, Rabate starts by sketching its genealogy, particularly its relation to surrealism, philosophy, and the hard sciences. Against this background, he proposes that theory, like hysteria, consistently points out the inadequacies of official, serious and 'masterful' knowledge. Its role, he suggests, is to ask difficult, foundational questions, which entail revisionary readings of culture and its texts. In this way, Rabate claims, whether the theory of the moment is structuralism or globalization, theory in its broader sense will always return, providing us with provocative and stimulating insights into what we do and how we read.
具體描述
讀後感
評分
評分
評分
評分
用戶評價
哎 還是蠻失望的吧 不可避免的落入瞭post-structuralism 'always asking the right questions without offering any answers'的窠臼 還不如當成history of theory的課本去讀
评分當然啦，未來隻有最後一張啦其實。作者對法國理論運動非常瞭解，整體是對這一運動的迴顧和評估。結論可想而知的是那種模稜兩可的後現代味道。整體文風很後現代。。較難把握。總的來說，和大多數後現代理論闡釋一樣，沒什麼意思，卻一個勁地圍繞後結構視為珍寶的「要有意思」的口號。。。
评分哎 還是蠻失望的吧 不可避免的落入瞭post-structuralism 'always asking the right questions without offering any answers'的窠臼 還不如當成history of theory的課本去讀
评分哎 還是蠻失望的吧 不可避免的落入瞭post-structuralism 'always asking the right questions without offering any answers'的窠臼 還不如當成history of theory的課本去讀
评分當然啦，未來隻有最後一張啦其實。作者對法國理論運動非常瞭解，整體是對這一運動的迴顧和評估。結論可想而知的是那種模稜兩可的後現代味道。整體文風很後現代。。較難把握。總的來說，和大多數後現代理論闡釋一樣，沒什麼意思，卻一個勁地圍繞後結構視為珍寶的「要有意思」的口號。。。
相關圖書
本站所有內容均為互聯網搜索引擎提供的公開搜索信息，本站不存儲任何數據與內容，任何內容與數據均與本站無關，如有需要請聯繫相關搜索引擎包括但不限於百度，google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 qciss.net All Rights Reserved. 小哈圖書下載中心 版权所有