Cinephilia and History, or The Wind in the Trees pdf epub mobi txt 电子书 下载 2025
- cinephilia
- 迷影
- 电影
- Film&TV_Theory&Industry
- 美国
- 电影研究
- 电影史
- 文献资料
"Cinephilia and History, or The Wind in the Trees" is in part a history of cinephilia, in part an attempt to recapture the spirit of cinephilia for the discipline of film studies, and in part an experiment in cinephilic writing. Cinephiles have regularly fetishized contingent, marginal details in the motion picture image: the gesture of a hand, the wind in the trees. Christian Keathley demonstrates that the spectatorial tendency that produces such cinematic encounters - a viewing practice marked by a drift in visual attention away from the primary visual elements on display - in fact has clear links to the origins of film as defined by Andre Bazin, Roland Barthes, and others. Keathley explores the implications of this ontology and proposes the 'cinephiliac anecdote' as a new type of criticism, a method of historical writing that both imitates and extends the experience of these fugitive moments. Raised in south Florida, Christian Keathley earned his B.A. and M.A. degrees from University of Florida, Gainesville. He holds an M.F.A. in Filmmaking from the School of the Art Institute of Chicago and a Ph.D. in Film Studies from the University of Iowa. His production work has been screened at the San Francisco Cinematheque, the Art Institute of Chicago, and the North Carolina School of the Arts. His scholarly work has appeared in "Art Papers", "Film Comment", and "Framework", and in the volumes Directed by Allen Smithee and "The Last Great American Picture Show". He is currently Assistant Professor in the Film & Media Culture Program at Middlebury College, Vermont.
具体描述
读后感
评分
评分
评分
评分
用户评价
Christian Keathley的观点是，不只要把迷影历史化，而且要将历史迷影化。他引入了Paul Willemen的Cinephilia moment，第一次看到这个概念时非常兴奋，但Keathley还是把它解释得太学究气了，而且还煞有其事地提出了方法论，用panoramic perception来全景扫描。能被理性捕捉和定格的时刻还是迷影时刻吗？但话说回来，本书在研究思路上还是要好过那些泛泛而谈的迷影专著，真正从迷影批评实践的角度赋予了“迷影精神”生产力。虽然作者本人很欣赏法国人的研究传统，但其实他已经远远超过他们了。
评分一点也不精彩。
评分Christian Keathley的观点是，不只要把迷影历史化，而且要将历史迷影化。他引入了Paul Willemen的Cinephilia moment，第一次看到这个概念时非常兴奋，但Keathley还是把它解释得太学究气了，而且还煞有其事地提出了方法论，用panoramic perception来全景扫描。能被理性捕捉和定格的时刻还是迷影时刻吗？但话说回来，本书在研究思路上还是要好过那些泛泛而谈的迷影专著，真正从迷影批评实践的角度赋予了“迷影精神”生产力。虽然作者本人很欣赏法国人的研究传统，但其实他已经远远超过他们了。
评分Christian Keathley的观点是，不只要把迷影历史化，而且要将历史迷影化。他引入了Paul Willemen的Cinephilia moment，第一次看到这个概念时非常兴奋，但Keathley还是把它解释得太学究气了，而且还煞有其事地提出了方法论，用panoramic perception来全景扫描。能被理性捕捉和定格的时刻还是迷影时刻吗？但话说回来，本书在研究思路上还是要好过那些泛泛而谈的迷影专著，真正从迷影批评实践的角度赋予了“迷影精神”生产力。虽然作者本人很欣赏法国人的研究传统，但其实他已经远远超过他们了。
评分一点也不精彩。
相关图书
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息，本站不存储任何数据与内容，任何内容与数据均与本站无关，如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度，google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.wenda123.org All Rights Reserved. 图书目录大全 版权所有