具体描述
读后感
The title of this book is Criminal Justice instead of Criminal Law. The focus of this book is not law proper, but rather “institutional practice of punishment in twentieth-century China”(Tsin review), as the author say in the introduction, how the legal p...
评分The title of this book is Criminal Justice instead of Criminal Law. The focus of this book is not law proper, but rather “institutional practice of punishment in twentieth-century China”(Tsin review), as the author say in the introduction, how the legal p...
评分The title of this book is Criminal Justice instead of Criminal Law. The focus of this book is not law proper, but rather “institutional practice of punishment in twentieth-century China”(Tsin review), as the author say in the introduction, how the legal p...
评分The title of this book is Criminal Justice instead of Criminal Law. The focus of this book is not law proper, but rather “institutional practice of punishment in twentieth-century China”(Tsin review), as the author say in the introduction, how the legal p...
评分The title of this book is Criminal Justice instead of Criminal Law. The focus of this book is not law proper, but rather “institutional practice of punishment in twentieth-century China”(Tsin review), as the author say in the introduction, how the legal p...
用户评价
衣食父母，解答了太多问题。然而更多的作为一个通史简单叙述了整个司法体系的变迁，没有给出作者的判读。可能只是因为成书比较早？此外作者在讲“教育改变思想”的时候没有提及无政府主义对此论点的影响，不知是否为疏忽。关于“悔罪”减少刑期这个特色只有在结尾简略提及，这个话题应该可以进一步展开来讲，不过这个书本质可能就是法学通史，因此没有必要在细节上多费笔墨吧。关于49年后法律模糊，辅助迫害持异见者，进而导致大范围恐慌这个结论，即使在今天看，也是心有戚戚焉。
评分1、49年之后的部分没看。2、作者截取史料和把握大问题的能力都有值得称道的地方，只是读下来无论小观点还是大结论都实在缺乏新意，感觉更像一本巨型文献综述，还不如直接去看郑秦、冯客、魏斐德和徐小群的书来的痛快。3、不知获奖的理由是什么……没见啥新方法和新史料
评分one chapter for an epoch.
评分以监所为载体来mirror/resonate 监所外的国家与社会的控制和服从、反抗。
评分1、49年之后的部分没看。2、作者截取史料和把握大问题的能力都有值得称道的地方，只是读下来无论小观点还是大结论都实在缺乏新意，感觉更像一本巨型文献综述，还不如直接去看郑秦、冯客、魏斐德和徐小群的书来的痛快。3、不知获奖的理由是什么……没见啥新方法和新史料
相关图书
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息，本站不存储任何数据与内容，任何内容与数据均与本站无关，如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度，google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.wenda123.org All Rights Reserved. 图书目录大全 版权所有