Modernization and Bureaucratic-Authoritarianism 在線電子書 圖書標籤: 比較政治 政治學 拉美研究 威權主義 政治經濟學 politics 民主理論 政治社會學
發表於2024-11-22
Modernization and Bureaucratic-Authoritarianism 在線電子書 pdf 下載 txt下載 epub 下載 mobi 下載 2024
現代化過程中(具體來說,就是進口替代戰略)形成的官僚威權主義政治形態。
評分南美的威權政權形成更多像是外源性的(海外受訓歸國精英對現政權不滿串聯各職業階層訴諸民粹取代不那麼有效的民主),因此在政治運動中時常會“狗咬尾巴”;東亞部分類似南美,部分則來自自身蛻變(極權→威權),因此“進步”的感覺比照南美會顯得更強
評分現代化過程中(具體來說,就是進口替代戰略)形成的官僚威權主義政治形態。
評分現代化過程中(具體來說,就是進口替代戰略)形成的官僚威權主義政治形態。
評分南美的威權政權形成更多像是外源性的(海外受訓歸國精英對現政權不滿串聯各職業階層訴諸民粹取代不那麼有效的民主),因此在政治運動中時常會“狗咬尾巴”;東亞部分類似南美,部分則來自自身蛻變(極權→威權),因此“進步”的感覺比照南美會顯得更強
Guillermo A. O'Donnell (1936–2011) was a prominent Argentine political scientist, who spent most of his career working in Argentina and the United States, and who made lasting contributions to theorizing on authoritarianism and democratization, democracy and the state, and the politics of Latin America. His brother, Pacho O'Donnell, is a well-known politician and writer.
O’Donnell’s Modernization and Bureaucratic Authoritarianism (1973) offered a pioneering analysis of the breakdown of democracies in South America in the 1960s. He argued that the form of authoritarianism experienced by South America starting in the 1960s was novel because it was based on modern technocrats and a professionalized military organization, instead of populist politicians or traditional military strongmen. To capture this distinctiveness, he coined the term 'bureaucratic authoritarianism'. O’Donnell argued that this new form of authoritarianism emerged as the result of political conflict generated by an import-substitution model of industrialization. He cast his argument as an alternative to the thesis, advanced most notably by Seymour Martin Lipset, that industrialization produced democracy. In South America, O’Donnell argued, industrialization generated not democracy, but bureaucratic authoritarianism. This work, along with a series of subsequent articles, triggered an important debate in comparative politics and Latin American Studies about the political consequences of economic development.
第一章批评流行的线性观念和定量回归研究,可见当时方法论上的纠结和逐渐进步的状况。奥唐奈提出的问题,如定量模型中概念框架会决定问题走向和数据选用(于是奥唐奈认为“authoritarian主义”这种在当时冥主化理论看起来是“变体”“异种”的东西,换一个角度看就很容易解释得...
評分第一章批评流行的线性观念和定量回归研究,可见当时方法论上的纠结和逐渐进步的状况。奥唐奈提出的问题,如定量模型中概念框架会决定问题走向和数据选用(于是奥唐奈认为“authoritarian主义”这种在当时冥主化理论看起来是“变体”“异种”的东西,换一个角度看就很容易解释得...
評分第一章批评流行的线性观念和定量回归研究,可见当时方法论上的纠结和逐渐进步的状况。奥唐奈提出的问题,如定量模型中概念框架会决定问题走向和数据选用(于是奥唐奈认为“authoritarian主义”这种在当时冥主化理论看起来是“变体”“异种”的东西,换一个角度看就很容易解释得...
評分第一章批评流行的线性观念和定量回归研究,可见当时方法论上的纠结和逐渐进步的状况。奥唐奈提出的问题,如定量模型中概念框架会决定问题走向和数据选用(于是奥唐奈认为“authoritarian主义”这种在当时冥主化理论看起来是“变体”“异种”的东西,换一个角度看就很容易解释得...
評分第一章批评流行的线性观念和定量回归研究,可见当时方法论上的纠结和逐渐进步的状况。奥唐奈提出的问题,如定量模型中概念框架会决定问题走向和数据选用(于是奥唐奈认为“authoritarian主义”这种在当时冥主化理论看起来是“变体”“异种”的东西,换一个角度看就很容易解释得...
Modernization and Bureaucratic-Authoritarianism 在線電子書 pdf 下載 txt下載 epub 下載 mobi 下載 2024