Machiavelli's ambiguous treatment of religion has fuelled a contentious and long-standing debate among scholars. Whereas some insist that Machiavelli is a Christian, others maintain he is a pagan. Sullivan mediates between these divergent views by arguing that he is neither but that he utilizes elements of both understandings arrayed in a wholly new way. She develops her argument by distinguishing among the three Romes that can be understood as existing in Machiavelli's political thought: the first is the Rome of the Christian era, dominated by the pope; the second is the republican Rome of pagan times, which Machiavelli praises; and the third is an idealized Rome that is neither entirely pagan nor entirely Christian. In part 1, Sullivan examines Machiavelli's treatment of Christian Rome to find that in his view the Church and the beliefs of Christianity have fostered grave political problems. Indeed, he contends that Christianity exercises a type of tyrannical rule over human beings. His recognition motivates his seemingly enthusiastic turn to the pagan Rome of the "Discourses". Examining his treatment of pagan Rome in part 2, Sullivan finds that Machiavelli is critical of this apparent alternative to Christian Rome. In particular, Machiavelli demonstrates that republican Rome proved inept at handling its ambitious men who vied for power. Sullivan also shows how Machiavelli infuses his discussions of republican Rome with terms evocative of Christianity in a way that suggests Christian governance ultimately derived from pagan Rome. The ancient city is an insufficient model for the people of his times, and thus he proposes an idealized Rome that will transcend the problems both of Christian and of pagan Rome. The character of Machiavelli's new Rome provides the focus of Part 3. Sullivan argues here that Machiavelli's new Rome will embody certain elements of the two other Romes yet will overcome the failings of each. She shows Machiavelli's thought to be a highly original response to what he understood to be the crisis of his times. Sullivan draws primarily from the "Florentine Histories", "The Prince" and the "Discourses" to offer a unique study of Machiavelli's political thought. Her examination of Machiavelli's three Romes will interest scholars of political science and political philosophy.
评分
评分
评分
评分
这本书的语言风格,可以说是一种融合了古典的庄重与现代的犀利。它避免了过于晦涩的古风,却又保留了对宏大叙事的掌控力,使得即便是对古典政治哲学不甚了解的读者,也能轻松地进入情境。作者对节奏的把控达到了炉火纯青的地步,时而用长句来铺陈环境和心绪,营造出一种庄严的氛围,时而又用短促有力的句子来表达瞬间的决断和爆发性的冲突,这种抑扬顿挫,使得阅读过程充满了韵律感。尤其值得称道的是,作者在关键转折点时所使用的修辞手法,常常是点到为止,留给读者足够的想象空间去填补那些未尽之言,这种“留白”的艺术,使得整本书的意境得到了极大的提升,让人在合上书本之后,仍能听到那些未曾说出口的叹息和权谋的低语。
评分我对这本书中对于“理想主义”与“现实主义”之间鸿沟的描绘感到震撼。作者没有将任何一方描绘成绝对的胜利者或失败者,而是呈现了一个残酷的现实:在权力的游戏中,最纯粹的信念往往是最先被消磨殆尽的牺牲品。书中那些关于政治手腕的描写,不是空泛的理论,而是通过一系列精心设计的冲突场景,将抽象的概念具象化为血淋淋的决策。我特别留意了那些关于外交辞令的描写,那其中蕴含的试探、欺骗与妥协,比任何直接的战斗场面都要来得紧张刺激。它揭示了一个冰冷的事实:维护稳定往往需要付出道德上的代价,而作者则非常冷静地记录下了这一切,没有道德说教,只有赤裸裸的因果关系呈现,读完后心情会非常复杂,因为它挑战了我们对“好人”和“坏人”的简单定义。
评分这本书在结构上的安排极具匠心,它不是那种线性叙事,而是通过不同时间点和不同人物的视角进行跳跃式的穿插,初读时可能会略感迷失,但一旦抓住主线,便会惊叹于作者构建这座文学迷宫的精巧。每一次的视角转换,都像是从不同的角度重新审视了同一场棋局,先前看似不经意的细节,在新的叙述下立刻迸发出惊人的意义。这种多维度的呈现方式,极大地增强了故事的层次感和厚重感,完全避免了传统历史题材的单调乏味。我个人认为,正是这种非线性的处理,成功地模拟了历史本身的无序和随机性,让读者不再是旁观者,而更像是参与到历史进程的碎片化重构之中,每一次阅读都能发现新的关联,这种体验是独一无二的。
评分这本书的叙事视角简直是神来之笔,它巧妙地将我们带入一个充满权力斗争和人性挣扎的漩涡之中。作者对于历史背景的考据可谓是深入骨髓,每一个细节都仿佛是亲眼所见,那种厚重的历史感扑面而来,让人在阅读时忍不住要停下来,反复咀嚼那些精妙的措辞和深远的寓意。特别是对于那些次要人物的刻画,也丝毫没有敷衍了事,他们如同舞台上的群星,各自闪耀着独特的光芒,共同构筑起一个无比复杂而又引人入胜的社会图景。我尤其欣赏作者在处理冲突时的那种克制与张力,他从不急于给出简单的答案,而是将选择的重负实实在在地放在了人物的肩上,让读者也跟着他们一起体验那种左右为难的煎熬。整本书读下来,感觉像经历了一场漫长而又极其真实的政治洗礼,让人对人性的复杂有了更深层次的体悟,绝非那种肤浅的宫廷秘闻录可比,它的深度足以让那些热衷于历史分析的读者们津津乐道上很久。
评分不得不说,作者的文笔有一种近乎冷峻的精确性,读起来酣畅淋漓,却又暗藏着一股不动声色的力量。他似乎对人类心理的阴暗面有着近乎病态的洞察力,笔下的人物,无论是高高在上的统治者,还是身处底层的谋士,都充满了令人信服的缺陷与野心。这种对“真实”的追求,使得书中的道德判断变得异常模糊,你很难简单地去谴责某一个人,因为你会发现,在特定的环境下,他们的选择似乎是唯一的出路。这种叙事上的不带偏见,反而给了读者极大的思考空间,迫使我们去反思所谓的“正义”和“权力”之间的微妙界限。我花了好几天时间才消化完最后几章,那种意犹未尽的感觉,不是因为情节不够精彩,而是因为那些关于权力运作的底层逻辑,需要时间去沉淀和消化,它像一坛陈年的老酒,后劲十足,回味悠长。
评分delicate and consistent...发扬了施特劳斯认为马基雅维利反对基督教的一面。部分文本细读很新颖,但似乎也有点捕风捉影。
评分delicate and consistent...发扬了施特劳斯认为马基雅维利反对基督教的一面。部分文本细读很新颖,但似乎也有点捕风捉影。
评分delicate and consistent...发扬了施特劳斯认为马基雅维利反对基督教的一面。部分文本细读很新颖,但似乎也有点捕风捉影。
评分delicate and consistent...发扬了施特劳斯认为马基雅维利反对基督教的一面。部分文本细读很新颖,但似乎也有点捕风捉影。
评分delicate and consistent...发扬了施特劳斯认为马基雅维利反对基督教的一面。部分文本细读很新颖,但似乎也有点捕风捉影。
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2026 book.wenda123.org All Rights Reserved. 图书目录大全 版权所有