A review of 200 or 300 words cannot do justice to a book like this: it is the summation of a great critic's most fundamental beliefs--something like a dying Bernstein's last performance of Mahler's ninth, though in this case a lot less sad. In fact, this book of essays represents Bloom at his most celebratory, and there's a wonderful, vigorous energy about it. Why, one wonders, reading it, do we bother reading anybody but Shakespeare, Dante, or Chaucer? The argument for Shakespeare is particularly compelling. Bloom believes that Shakespeare is the canon: that he defines for the Western world the standards by which we judge all literature. And more: he defines for us what we are ourselves, what we understand of human nature. This argument, offered with Bloom's customary flare for the controversial, is akin to the remark that all philosophy is a footnote to Plato, and like it, is probably in large measure true. Thus, modern psychology doesn't add very much to what people could have already learned from reading Shakespeare because Shakespeare defines the limits of what we know: we can't get beyond or outside him. Certainly, experience teaches that Bloom is right; indeed, the evolution of human consciousness seems to have taken one of its periodic jolts forward about the time of Shakespeare, and he above all seems to have captured the entire scope of what was new. As Bloom points out, Shakespeare is universally adored, in all languages, and perhaps it is for this reason. The essays on Dante and Chaucer are almost equally powerful, though in a sense less awesome. And the brief remarks about the powerful movements of resentment trying to push apart these great pillars of the Western canon, though perspicacious, are melancholy and incidental. Get this book for the great essays on Shakespeare. For lovers of literature, probably nothing more powerful or in an odd way more religious will be written this year. Stuart Whitwell --This text refers to an out of print or unavailable edition of this title.
哈罗德·布鲁姆,1930年出生于纽约,先后就读于康奈尔大学和耶鲁大学,1955年起在耶鲁大学任教。早期研究浪漫主义诗歌,曾出版过论布莱克、雪莱、叶芝、斯蒂文斯等英美诗人的专著。除先前提到《影响的焦虑》、《西方正典》之外,他还著有《误读之图》、《卡巴拉犹太神秘哲学与批评》、《诗与隐抑》以及即将出版的新作《耶稣和亚维:神圣之名》(Jesus and Yahweh:The Names Divine)。作为一个批评家,布鲁姆主要研究领域包括诗歌批评、理论批评和宗教批评三大方面,而英国浪漫主义诗歌、后期弗洛伊德的精神分析理论和犹太教的诺斯替主义与喀巴拉主义则是这些批评的主要对象。在美国,布鲁姆绝对算得上是一个大牌的学者和批评家。他以其独特的理论建构和批评实践被誉为是“西方传统中最有天赋、最有原创性和最具煽动性的一位文学批评家”。
美国学者协会曾对40所大学进行抽样调查,测定20世纪学生文学知识的变化。结果显示:如果把1900年定为100分,1914年一次大战前就是99分,1939年二战前则为73分,1964年越战前降至69分,1993年伊拉克战争后只剩了25分。总之这条曲线一个世纪来持续下落,最近的40年更几乎就是自...
评分美国学者协会曾对40所大学进行抽样调查,测定20世纪学生文学知识的变化。结果显示:如果把1900年定为100分,1914年一次大战前就是99分,1939年二战前则为73分,1964年越战前降至69分,1993年伊拉克战争后只剩了25分。总之这条曲线一个世纪来持续下落,最近的40年更几乎就是自...
评分哈罗德·布卢姆有一种濒临灭绝的珍稀生物的气质,至少他有自视为一种衰亡了的伟大传统的最后捍卫者的倾向。对这个传统,我今天突然找到了一个准确的表达,那就是:对文学的爱。其实,简单地把布卢姆自己树立的敌人——“憎恨学派”——反过来,也就得到了他自己的定位。因此,...
评分2005-11-14 南方都市报 图书诊室 一号对象 《西方正典》中译本 鉴定:此书一方面没有注释,加上译名不规范,很多时候读者都猜不出书里讲的是谁以及是什么书。还有很多一望可知的错漏比前几年出版的文学理论书要多出很多,这与这本书的重要性有些不...
评分作者哈罗德·布鲁姆的语调是有些激愤有些无奈的,他意识到当前流行的大学英语系并不能使人们真正了解语言文化,相反,英语系中讲授的诸如摇滚乐、迪斯尼乐园、好莱坞等流行文化会使本来应该为语言文化之正宗的莎士比亚、但丁趋向边缘,最终缩减为类似拉丁语一样由校园里顽固的...